Filter out failing tempest volume test on stable Ocata branch
Affects | Status | Importance | Assigned to | Milestone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
neutron |
Fix Released
|
Undecided
|
Bernard Cafarelli |
Bug Description
Per [0] "There is no statement about the level of testing and upgrades from Extended Maintenance are not supported within the Community."
In Ocata (currently in EM) and Pike (soon to be) branches, we see Zuul check failures from time to time on unstable tests, that require a few rechecks before the backport gets in.
For some issues it is better to fix the test/setup itself when it is easy (see [1] and [2] for recent examples), but for some failing tests (testing exotic cases or not directly related to networking), we should start filtering them out.
An initial example is tempest.
http://
We can use this bug to track later similar additions
[0] https:/
[1] https:/
[2] https:/
summary: |
- Limit test coverage for Extended Maintenance stable branches + Filter out failing tempest volume test on stable Ocata branch |
Changed in neutron: | |
status: | Incomplete → Fix Released |
assignee: | nobody → Bernard Cafarelli (bcafarel) |
I understand the motivation to limit the CI maintenance effort as a stable branch get older. But how do you want to use this bug report? Do you want to keep it open indefinitely and refer to it from changes marking tests to be skipped or unstable? Won't we mix multiple distinct problems in the same tracking report then?