[RFE] Role-based access control for VPNaaS resources
Bug #1524264 reported by
zhaobo
This bug affects 1 person
| Affects | Status | Importance | Assigned to | Milestone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| neutron |
Won't Fix
|
Wishlist
|
Unassigned | ||
Bug Description
[Application scene]
Tenant A have a vpn, and A doesn't want to share own vpn to those A doesn't believe or no payment, so tenant A may be the vpn supplier. Tenant B want to use the vpn through A shared to B. Generally, one share to specified ones to use owned vpn is an normal thing.
[Proposal]
Now vpn didn't contain the 'shared' field, so we should extend it and fulfill the function of share to specified tenants based on rbac policies.
| Changed in neutron: | |
| assignee: | nobody → zhaobo (zhaobo6) |
| summary: |
- RFE]should support share vpn to specify tenant + [RFE] Role-based access control for VPNaaS resources |
| tags: | added: access-control vpnaas |
| Changed in neutron: | |
| status: | New → Confirmed |
| tags: | added: rfe |
| Changed in neutron: | |
| importance: | Undecided → Wishlist |
Revision history for this message
| Armando Migliaccio (armando-migliaccio) wrote | #1 |
| Changed in neutron: | |
| status: | Confirmed → Won't Fix |
| assignee: | zhaobo (zhaobo6) → nobody |
To post a comment you must log in.
The P in VPN stands for Private. I am not sure I understand what sharing VPN's across tenants would actually mean. It's an interesting concept, but there's not enough details that would justify the extra layer of complexity. As for VPNaaS I think there are a few existing unaddressed needs that make this particular request not worth pursuing right now. We'll have to reassess later on.