Comment 5 for bug 1450617

Hi Armando,

Thank you very much for triaging this bug and your suggestion of starting a new project for faster iteration.

Since your reply says this project/feature should be part of the Neutron Tent, I have gone through the email thread discussing the Neutron Tent. Following are some questions which I would appreciate your clarification:

1. When setting up a new repo for this project, should we create the repo under OpenStack/Neutron/ namespace ? If not, which namespace should it be?

2. Shall we add an entry for this project under Neutron in reference/projects.yaml as stated in the neutron Tent email thread?

3. You mentioned that we'd want SFC to plug back into the Neutron core where it makes sense and the missing pieces that would be required for tighter integration with the core. I plan to discuss with the team and identify the specific pieces of work that need to be plug back into Neutron in next week's IRC meeting. Once we agree on the piece, I will submit a new bug or update this bug.

4. By "a new team", you mean registering a team for service chain project in launchpad.net, right?

Also thanks for your offer of helping creating the repo, IRC meeting etc. I know you are very busy as a core member and I can take care of creating the repo, meeting, and team once I get clarification on my above questions. I have a list of people from various companies who have expressed interest in contributing to this project. As to the weekly IRC meeting, per request of people, several weeks ago I already set that up and sent the info to the openstack-dev. I will start the IRC meeting next Thursday and send out a reminder next week.

Cathy