Comment 17 for bug 1375625

"It doesn't look like you reviewed [1]. Do you mind looking into it? I trust your expertise on the matter."

I will.

"prepare L3 HA as a production ready solution without so huge dependency on Pacemaker."

I've never seen an OpenStack HA architecture that doesn't use Pacemaker or equivalent solution. What do you do about fencing? Do you propose that OpenStack itself should take care of that? There will always be requirements from an HA solution that the different OpenStack projects should not deal with (Out of scope), that's where something like Pacemaker comes in. Therefor, I've always assumed it's there, and never considered pursuing a solution that is completely independent from Pacemaker.