2017-02-03 14:35:01 |
Bernard Cafarelli |
description |
Currently, tempest tests need to be run sequentially, or else they fail with bugs like bug #1655618
Tests work for now with this workaround:
https://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/networking-sfc/commit/?id=d31008bc0c8a829995a310b64519d125f6c055c1
But they should be updated to allow parallel runs (http://docs.openstack.org/developer/tempest/HACKING.html#parallel-test-execution)
One of the identified reasons is flow classifier parameters are identical between tests, so this generates conflicts like:
Details: {u'type': u'PortChainFlowClassifierInConflict', u'detail': u'', u'message': u'Flow Classifier fdce19cc-bc4c-432d-b4d0-bc5e1fb795a5 conflicts with Flow Classifier a5db4038-e49f-4c7e-9e5b-13b2beee3251 in port chain 07bd1ba0-202e-4551-b4ee-971f4f3c4ec2.'}
But there may be more |
Currently, tempest tests need to be run sequentially, or else they fail with bugs like bug #1655618
Tests work for now with this workaround:
https://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/networking-sfc/commit/?id=d31008bc0c8a829995a310b64519d125f6c055c1
But they should be updated to allow parallel runs (http://docs.openstack.org/developer/tempest/HACKING.html#parallel-test-execution)
One of the identified reasons is flow classifier parameters are identical between tests, so this generates conflicts like:
Details: {u'type': u'PortChainFlowClassifierInConflict', u'detail': u'', u'message': u'Flow Classifier fdce19cc-bc4c-432d-b4d0-bc5e1fb795a5 conflicts with Flow Classifier a5db4038-e49f-4c7e-9e5b-13b2beee3251 in port chain 07bd1ba0-202e-4551-b4ee-971f4f3c4ec2.'}
But there may be more problems to fix before having parallel-capable tempest tests |
|