Invalid YAML in docs

[Joshua Powers]

[Impact]
Netplan users referring to documentation to know how to write configurations.

[Test case]
1) check 'man netplan'

[Regression potential]
None, this change is limited to correcting incorrect documentation.

---

In the documentation there are examples of YAML definitions that are not valid YAML syntax. Take for example:

 addresses: [192.168.14.2/24, 2001:1::1/64]

This will error with:

(<unknown>): found unexpected ':' while scanning a plain scalar at line 1 column 31

This is because the IPv6 address has a ':' and it is not escaped. Putting quotes around the IPv6 address or avoiding the one line list format would be best.

This occurs again in the nameservers example with:

      addresses: [8.8.8.8, FEDC::1]

[Mathieu Trudel-Lapierre (cyphermox)]

Landed various fixes for doc syntax:

https://git.launchpad.net/netplan/commit/?id=70a71546c6cc69c8279dcebfdbaa28f1b8e901da
https://git.launchpad.net/netplan/commit/?id=e355931ebaad609b9ed6a26e80972fd3afa0e7a7

nplan 0.33 has been uploaded to bionic-proposed, but is currently blocked on a juju-core SRU to xenial.

[Launchpad Janitor (janitor)]

This bug was fixed in the package nplan - 0.33

---------------
nplan (0.33) bionic; urgency=medium

  * replug: Do not unbind ath9kl_sdio. Thanks Oliver! (LP: #1741910)
  * doc: fix syntax for IPv6 example addresses. IPv6 needs to be escaped in
    YAML. (LP: #1735317)
  * debian/postinst: Write breadcrumbs on disk in /etc/network/interfaces to
    denote the migration to using netplan. (LP: #1744968)
  * bridge: implement port-priority support for the NM and networkd backends.
    (LP: #1735821)
  * doc: routes are not top-level but per-interface. (LP: #1726695)
  * Rework CLI parsing / code layout to better handle subcommands.

 -- Mathieu Trudel-Lapierre <email address hidden> Tue, 23 Jan 2018 11:32:47 -0500

[Chris Halse Rogers (raof)]

Hello Joshua, or anyone else affected,

Accepted nplan into artful-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nplan/0.32~17.10.2 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed.Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested and change the tag from verification-needed-artful to verification-done-artful. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-failed-artful. In either case, without details of your testing we will not be able to proceed.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance!

[Łukasz Zemczak (sil2100)]

Hello Joshua, or anyone else affected,

Accepted nplan into artful-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nplan/0.32~17.10.3 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed.Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested and change the tag from verification-needed-artful to verification-done-artful. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-failed-artful. In either case, without details of your testing we will not be able to proceed.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance!

[Łukasz Zemczak (sil2100)]

Accepted for xenial-proposed. Please test the package and set the verification-done-xenial on success. Thank you!

[Mathieu Trudel-Lapierre (cyphermox)]

Verification-done for xenial (nplan 0.32~16.04.4):
Verification-done for artful (nplan 0.32~17.10.3):

Verified that the configuration examples in netplan manpage/doc correctly escape (in quotes) IPv6 addresses.

[Brian Murray (brian-murray)]

The verification of the Stable Release Update for nplan has completed successfully and the package has now been released to -updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In the event that you encounter a regression using the package from -updates please report a new bug using ubuntu-bug and tag the bug report regression-update so we can easily find any regressions.

[Launchpad Janitor (janitor)]

This bug was fixed in the package nplan - 0.32~17.10.3

---------------
nplan (0.32~17.10.3) artful; urgency=medium

  * Don't silently break Bridge Priority by adding port-priority.

nplan (0.32~17.10.2) artful; urgency=medium

  * Fix syntax for IPv6 addresses in doc. (LP: #1735317)
  * doc: routes are not top-level but per-interface. (LP: #1726695)
  * Implement bridge port-priority parameter. (LP: #1735821)
  * Implement "optional: true" to correctly write systemd network definitions
    with "RequiredForOnline=false", such that these networks do not block boot.
    (LP: #1664844)
  * Various documentation fixes. (LP: #1751814)

 -- Mathieu Trudel-Lapierre <email address hidden> Fri, 02 Mar 2018 16:50:47 -0500

[Launchpad Janitor (janitor)]

This bug was fixed in the package nplan - 0.32~16.04.4

---------------
nplan (0.32~16.04.4) xenial; urgency=medium

  [ Oliver Grawert ]
  * Prevent unbinding ath6kl_sdio, driver does not support it correctly.
    (LP: #1741910)

  [ Mathieu Trudel-Lapierre ]
  * Re-add snap support patch. (LP: #1747714)
  * Fix syntax for IPv6 addresses in doc. (LP: #1735317)
  * doc: routes are not top-level but per-interface. (LP: #1726695)
  * Implement bridge port-priority parameter. (LP: #1735821)
  * Implement "optional: true" to correctly write systemd network definitions
    with "RequiredForOnline=false", such that these networks do not block boot.
    (LP: #1664844)
  * Various documentation fixes. (LP: #1751814)

 -- Mathieu Trudel-Lapierre <email address hidden> Fri, 02 Mar 2018 17:02:03 -0500