Comment 78 for bug 1083858

Revision history for this message
rrbrand (slbrando) wrote :

I was just looking at your patch,

Based on the MS documentation -> http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/ms644906%28v=vs.85%29.aspx

Shouldn't the req->rate not look more like

req->rate = min( 0x7FFFFFFF, max(timeout, 0x000000A) );

I think the effect is the same, but the patch would be more aligned to the spec