Drag n' Drop directories from File-Roller is somewhat tricky

[Amos Brocco]

Trying to drag n' drop directories from File-Roller to Nautilus (either the
desktop or a Nautilus window) does not always work. It seems to be extracting
things but nothing is dropped in the selected location. Drag n' dropping files
seems to work correctly.

Steps to reproduce:
1. Open a compressed archive containing directories with File-Roller
2. Try to drag n' drop a directory from File-Roller into a Nautilus window (or
to the desktop)
3. File-Roller seem to extract things but nothing is dropped in the target window

http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=102501: http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=102501

[Sebastien Bacher (seb128)]

seems to be this upstream bug:
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=102501

[Sebastien Bacher (seb128)]

*** Bug 13566 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Daniel Holbach (dholbach)]

Is on upstream's agenda fo 2.14 - hope they make it.

[Nicolò Chieffo (yelo3)]

I'm using file-roller 2.14.0 but the bug is still there!
Actually the file is dropped in the selected window only if you wait enought time with the button pressed, for the file to be decompressed.
So if you decompress a 1K file the you can't notice this bug, but if you try to drag and drop a 1GB file you'll have to hold the button for at least 20 minutes! (you can see it in the progress bar)

[Paco Avila (monkiki)]

Any progress in this bug? This is a serious issue for me because I work with big compressed files :(

[mangar (mycrapaccount-deactivatedaccount)]

adding my voice to the crowd:
this is really an annoying bug/misfeature..
(i've meant to file it as a bug report, bug found out it's already exists)

can you please put some pressure on upstream to fix it?
thanks in advance!

[mangar (mycrapaccount-deactivatedaccount)]

gah.. this bug is open since 2003! can it be closed in time for dapper?

[Sebastien Bacher (seb128)]

if you read the upstream bug you will notice that upstream has asked if somebody could give him a hand because he doesn't know how to fix it. "can you put some pressure on upstream to fix it" is not how free software works. Upstream works on that during his free time and non-payed. He stated he doesn't know how to fix the issue and made it clear too. Putting some pressure will just contribute to make him want to stop spending efforts for people who just complain when something doesn't work. Maybe you could be useful and contribute with a patch? Or if you don't code avoid putting "pressure" because that's not going to make anybody working faster

[mangar (mycrapaccount-deactivatedaccount)]

i try to ask around the lug, maybe someone there got the time/knowledge on how to fix the problem.

just for clarification, i didn't mean to imply any disrespect to the
author of file-roller, or to his efforts. i apologise for my tone of writing.

[Sebastien Bacher (seb128)]

No problem, I just wanted to point that the issue is going to be solved by complaining about upstream lack of reactivity but rather by people trying to work on fixing it

[Joseph Garvin (k04jg02)]

This bug needs to be fixed for dapper -- drag and drop is the most usable way of extracting files. It's a serious usability problem for this to be broken, especially since file roller gives the illusion of the file being extracted even though it's not.

[Sebastien Bacher (seb128)]

your patch is welcome if you have one

[Joseph Garvin (k04jg02)]

I don't mean to sound like some unwilling-to-contribute-will-just-whine sort of user, but frankly, Canonical should be writing the patch if nobody has stepped up to do so yet. While one of the advantages of open source from a user's perspective is that you can fix bugs on your own given the time, one of the advantages of open source as a business model is that you have the code to all of your product's (Ubuntu's) bundled software, so you're not stuck waiting for upstream to implement their own fix while you have deadlines to keep.

Dapper is going to be a supported release for 3 years. I think it's in your own interest not to ship a broken product.

[Paco Avila (monkiki)]

I think so, why can't Canonical fix this bug? For most people this bug makes File-roller unusable. Yes it is a silly bug, but people dislike strange programs behaviour.

[Sebastien Bacher (seb128)]

maybe writting that change is not that easy? maybe canonical people are really busy and that's not the top priority (file-roller is only an application of the set shipped and maybe not the most important one, and there is a button for that function)

[mangar (mycrapaccount-deactivatedaccount)]

If there isn't any patch available, what about changing the
default archive manager?

for example:
xarchiver:
http://xarchiver.xfce.org/
or
xarchive:
http://xarchive.sourceforge.net/

(that's what i've found on gnomefiles.org, sorry for not trying harder..)

Those might not be the official gnome utilities, but if they work,
and adhere to the FOSS license, why not use them (especially
with the goal of long term support)?

thanks in advance!

[Paco Avila (monkiki)]

Perhaps it is a good solution...

[Sebastien Bacher (seb128)]

Switching to a new app to avoid a bug is not a good idea, especially just before a new distribution version. We appreciate your interest for that bug, but the way to help getting them fixed is to work on a patch. We known that's an issue so no need to keep sending comment saying it has to be fixed. If it's not fixed yet that's just because the few people working on the Ubuntu desktop and upstream on that are too busy, and a flood of comment will not make a difference on that

[Amos Brocco (mriya3)]

uhm... I think that Xarchiver does not support drag n' drop at all

It seems that I've found an argument in defense of File-Roller...
I've tried to drag and drop things from Ark (the KDE equivalent of File-Roller) to Konqueror and I get the same behavior: I have to wait with the button pressed until the file is uncompressed in the temporary directory and then the URI is passed to the drop target (I've tried with the vmware player Ubuntu image... a big file of 543M compressed and several gigs when uncompressed).

I don't know if I'm doing something wrong (I just installed KDE to test this... so I'm not a K-expert).

(small note: I've also noticed that it is not possible to drag things from Ark to Nautilus, but it is possible to drag from File-Roller to Konqueror.)

I think that the solution to this problem (without hacking with dnd protocol or nautilus) is to implement a gnome-vfs extension as it's proposed in gnome-bug page for this bug (so that it is possible to pass a list of pipelined zip/tar/... uri's to the drop target)

Note: I've tried with KDE on Breezy

[Nicolò Chieffo (yelo3)]

well, I have good news! I've just installed suse 10.1 and file-roller seems to support drag and drop well! this means that we could see which patch suse used and incorporate it in ubuntu too!

[Daniel Holbach (dholbach)]

Fixed in CVS - now depends on http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=171655 getting fixed.

[Ralf Nieuwenhuijsen (ralf-nieuwenhuijsen)]

In feisty drap and drop stopped working _completely_

Nice to see progress, heh? Is there an alternative program we can use?
Because this one is pretty much completely broken now .. no gnome-VFS support, no drag & drop, no extracting of selected files .. (only of all files).

I would like to just replace this program .. any one know any good alternatives?

[Didier L (l-farquaad)]

I confirm that It does not work at all under Feisty. I think this is a too bad regression because it is really anti-ergonomic: without this feature managing archives is not at all user-friendly. This kind of misfeature might even make some people leave Ubuntu I think...

IMHO its importance should thus be more serious than medium: it should be fixed before Feisty's release... please

[Sebastien Bacher (seb128)]

That's an upstream bug, not an Ubuntu one

[Bogdan Butnaru (bogdanb)]

It might be, but as long as Ubuntu doesn't offer an alternative that works as users expect it --- since Ubuntu is desktop-oriented, there are some things people expect --- it's an Ubuntu problem.

We don't even tell people the program in question is File-Roller. We call it "Archive manager". For anyone that's not very familiar with computer insides, that's "Ubuntu's archive manager".

I agree that this might need upstream attention, but what's an Ubuntu bug if this isn't one? I mean, if a program distributed by default on all Ubuntu distributions works badly because of upstream, isn't that an Ubuntu problem too? (What if it looks ugly? What if it looks defective? (like this one) What if it deletes hard-drives?)

[Ralf Nieuwenhuijsen (ralf-nieuwenhuijsen)]

I found Xarchiver to be a capable replacement.
It doesn't drag & drop as well, but at least you can press the 'extract' button and actually have some files extracted.

With file-roller there is currently -no way- to extract files.
You can't drag & drop, clicking the extract button brings up a dialog that refuses to extract files. Hence: you can't extract files.

At least one of the bugs in file-roller should be fixed before feisty's release or the whole package should be removed from the default install (preferbly replaced by Xarchiver).

PS. Why can't we use an older version of file-roller? At least the extract-button used to work. See also bug:

  https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/file-roller/+bug/74002

It doesn't work anymore either. So 99% of the users won't be able to extract files. I would prefer a fix to the extract-button thingie at least, but otherwise I strongly suggest we replace this package with Xarchiver.

If it doesn't get fixed, I know I will be replacing this on all the desktops I manage. (including a small office). I really can't tell these people to 'workaround' bugs and advocate the use of Ubuntu instead of Windows at the same time.

Besides, if a package is useless because its core function isn't working, what's the point of keeping it in the repo's. But that's another discussion. (kicking completely broken packages out the repo's)

[Sebastien Bacher (seb128)]

The comments on that bugs have no real use, complaining will not make the bug fixed faster. We acknowledge that's a problem and should be fixed, the thing is that there is over a thousand desktop bugs open at the moment and few people working on them and we can't work on everything at the same time. The versions are still being updated and feisty is not stable yet and we will fix lot of bugs before that. What would be useful is somebody trying to debug that to help the desktop team which has lot to do already

Replacing a program or reverting it to the previous version to avoid fixing a bug is not really constructive behaviour neither. What about trying to fix the bug rather than replacing it by an another program which has got not as much testing. It has dnd working, it might also have bugs than file-roller doesn't have.

[Bogdan Butnaru (bogdanb)]

To Ralf Nieuwenhuijsen: as far as I can tell, it does work using the Extract button. You probably have the issue from bug 80755, look there for a work-around.

[Ralf Nieuwenhuijsen (ralf-nieuwenhuijsen)]

@Sebastian.

You are right. It was a rant. I shouldn't have done that.
Yet I don't 'assume' this can be fixed. If I unstand the upstream bug report, nautilus needs to implement something, for this to work.

But I was out of line with my tone, sorry about that.

[Vytas (vytas)]

Drag and drop is not functioning completely for me with all archives types and file types/folders inside.

Up to date feisty

[Vytas (vytas)]

Feisty release is soon, I'll try to review it myself today with 2.18.0 vanilla tarball

[Bogdan Butnaru (bogdanb)]

This is an old bug as far as I know. Initially the behavior was the one described above, but now drag and drop doesn't work at all. There are some bugs registered on that, this should probably have it's name changed and linked as a duplicate.

[Vytas (vytas)]

This is an old bug, that file-roller must be fast enough to unarchive files while user is performing drag-and-drop, or the operation (partially) fails. This bug is annoying, but not so severe.

The new problem is that drag-and-drop is completely broken, we should try to fix that before feisty is released IMHO

[Vytas (vytas)]

Well, as I can see the problem is that bug with file roller was fixed upstream in 2.18, it switched to 'XdndDirectSave0' target instead of 'text/uri-list'. Nautilus does not support this yet, so it doesn't work with nautilus.

What should we do here?
1) implement this feature in nautilus and patch it
2) add older protocol to file-roller
3) just revert file roller to use older protocol (easiest, just pasting some code from 2.16)
4) do nothing and have broken DnD in feisty file-roller+nautilus

[Albert Santoni (gamegod)]

Vytas: It seems like the easiest fix in the short term would be to revert File-Roller to using the older protocol. Is someone willing to do this (soon)? Thanks

[Sebastien Bacher (seb128)]

That's not going to change in 7.04 now

[Paco Avila (monkiki)]

So, 7.04 will be released with this bug?

[yemu (yemu)]

yes it WAS released with this bug, is there any chance for fixing it now?

[Paco Avila (monkiki)]

GNOME people is amazing: file-roller uses an DragNDrop protocolo which is misunderstood by other major applications (Nautilus, gEdit, ...) so, why use it? Why not wait until implementing this protocol it the others apps?

[VF (vfiend)]

Thunar implements it.

Anyway everybody, look on the bright side: Now that it's COMPLETELY broken, maybe it'll motivate someone to fix this bug for good.

[Amos Brocco (mriya3)]

To Paco Avila:

"Why not wait until implementing this protocol it the others apps" : development must start somewhere... what if nautilus implemented it but nothing used it? Wouldn't it be the same situation?
Instead of just criticizing people about what they can afford to do or not do for FREE (software), why don't you start to contribute actively or just limit yourself to somewhat more constructive critiques?
"Thunar implements it." : if you like it, use it!... but then don't go on the thunar bugs page and file bugs just because there are features that "nautilus implements" and thunar not.

To VF:

Now it's not completely broken... thanks to developers, it's halfway fixed, and we can expect a complete fix for the next release. If you think it's so easy to fix, that it's just a problem of motivation, why don't you fix it yourself? Or propose a bounty for that?

[VF (vfiend)]

Sorry Amos, I wasn't trying to criticize. I'm letting people know why this was released: File Roller in its current state is useful for Thunar/XFCE users because Thunar implements the necessary protocol. The necessary protocol is NOT "misunderstood by all major applications."

My "completely broken" comment was aimed at trying to get people who seem very upset about this to calm down and realize people will be trying to fix it, though I suppose I phrased it poorly.

Emotions seem to be running high here for some reason, everyone needs to calm down and relax.

[Paco Avila (monkiki)]

My critique was constructive: the implementation of a new protocol should be coordinated in the release so all applications can communicate. From my point of view this is not a File-roller problem, but a general GNOME problem.

I am the main admin at http://www.guia-ubuntu.org/, so I spend a lot of time and contribute actively to Ubuntu. Also report any bug I see. This is also a contribution.

[xcxcx112 (xcxcx112)]

Yes! i can confirm this bug too.
file-roller does not support drag-and-drop files in Ubuntu Feisty 7.04 Final.
it was working well in Edgy, now it seems to be broken. :(

File Roller 2.18.1
Ubuntu Feisty 7.04 Final.

[Ari (ari-reads)]

Is there any known workaround / manual patching that can be done to get this working?

[Alessio Treglia (quadrispro)]

I can confirm this bug

Ubuntu Feisty Fawn 7.04

[George Dhoore (georgiepoo)]

Drag-and-drop to nautilus still does not work in fully updated Gutsy as of July, 29th 2007.

[Sebastien Bacher (seb128)]

That's why the bug is not closed yet

[Peter Makowski (petermakowski)]

I can confirm this bug in 7.04 and 7.10 tribe4

[Eugenia Loli-Queru (eloli)]

That's a kind of a feature that Apple or MS would never ship without. Ubuntu must get some priorities straight.

[mangar (mycrapaccount-deactivatedaccount)]

I agree with Eugenia - it may not be a critical bug, but it is a highly visible, and therefore, from user perspective, a critical one.

[Vytas (vytas)]

Ubuntu may face a bad review on osnews ;D

OK, now seriously.
As I've wrote, I tried looking into this myself. This is FAR from trivial. Nautilus source isn't the cleanest code on earth, especially that DnD part. There exists and old patch to add XdndDirectSave to nautilus, but it's just too old, and doesn't work at all (not sure if it ever did). So I am not surprised no one managed to fix this in the last GNOME release cycle, Sure Canonical could hire a developer to fix this problem, but their resources are limited too I guess.

So, in short, this is the case where UBUNTU/GNOME NEEDS YOUR HELP!

What I don't like about Ubuntu developers though, this bug is marked as 'Medium' importance. This is ridiculous. It actually is critical, I can imagine people trying to drag-n-drop files from archive and shouting WTF?!

[Sebastien Bacher (seb128)]

There is a difference between an annoying behaviour and something crashing your system and datas, abusing the severity is of no use, I'll mark it High which is likely the correct setting

[Alexander Hunziker (alex-hunziker)]

Maybe the Ubuntu dev team could check with the Nautilus developers how high on their agenda implementing XdndDirectSave is. If they reckon it's unlikely they have this ready for Gnome 2.22, then an alternative strategy might be to revert to the DnD Code of the older FileRoller versions?

[Amos Brocco (mriya3)]

I've just posted a patch against nautilus 2.18.1 on gnome bugzilla that adds XdndDirectSave support.
The code is adapted from Thunar 0.8.0 (Benedikt Meurer).

see http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=171655

Unfortunately I currently do not have a Gutsy install... so if somebody can verify if this patch works against nautilus 2.19.xx it would be great

:)

[Ralf Nieuwenhuijsen (ralf-nieuwenhuijsen)]

We love you Amos!

[LEVIS Cyril (atlas95)]

Cool !
Thanks for the patch!!

[amano (jyaku)]

This would be great, if it could be included for Gutsy.

Since it just adds a protocol, regressions don't seem to be probable.

Maybe Sebastien should consider this patch for inclusion since it fixes a big regression because up until Edgy Eft dragging and dropping files from FileRoller to the desktop at least partly worked. For all those switching from the Dapper LTS this would be a new regression.

And yeah, thanks for your patch, Amos. Sometimes wonders DO happen.

[Christoph Reiter (lazka)]

I've installed the following deb with the patch applied: http://ubuntuforums.org/showpost.php?p=3335858&postcount=11
it works for me (latest gutsy)

[Michael-250 (michael-250)]

I have also testet patched nautilus deb (http://ubuntuforums.org/showpost.php?p=3335858&postcount=11).

Works like a charm. I couldn't notice any regressions!
+1 for gutsy integration! We really need that dnd stuff...

[Achim (ach1m)]

I have also tested this patch and it works really nice.

So please let this patch find its way into gutsy.

[Sebastien Bacher (seb128)]

you should not install random deb from forums that's likely to break your next upgrades

[Robbert (robbertkrebbers)]

I build nautilus (2.19.91 on Gutsy x86_64) with the patch and it seems to work. Dragging files from file-roller to my desktop works like a charm, also to other nautilus windows.

But it doesn't work while dragging them to a nfs mount or an other remote location (for example ssh). It says "Cannot extract archives in a remote folder "<foldername>". But i can extract them to a remote location with the extract button in file-roller.

[Conn O Griofa (psyke83)]

Sebastien,

Yes, it's not a good idea to install random debs (although it's nice to know this patch works).

Users can see and downgrade packages through Synaptic's status filters or use "sudo apt-get install nautilus/gutsy" in this case. I hope this patch can make it into Gutsy in time, if everything is ok with it.

[cicoandcico (cicoandcico)]

tested the patch, drag&drop from file-roller now working. i'll test further and report any regression.

[Ralf Nieuwenhuijsen (ralf-nieuwenhuijsen)]

Inclusion in Gutsy would be nice, when there are no regressions.
Reading the above comments, it doesn't seem there any regressions. It went from not-working to not-working for remote directories. That's an improvement in my book.

Now, where do we send the flowers?

[Amos Brocco (mriya3)]

About the "Cannot extract archives in a remote folder "<foldername>" on drag and drop...

I've looked at the code and, to me, it seems that developers have forgotten to remove a test that prevented extraction to a remote folder in
the previous versions, when this was not possible. As now they added support for remote extraction via gnome-vfs ***, I don't think the error message is necessary.

so... I've attached a patch against file-roller 2.19.91 (it just deletes the "if" condition for non local uris in the dnd extraction)

I don't have much time now, please test it :)

*** see http://live.gnome.org/TwoPointNineteen/ReleaseNotes , "Uses gnome-vfs to load and save remote archives, as well as to add remote files to an archive and to extract to remote locations. USED."

[Robbert (robbertkrebbers)]

I just tested Amos his patch and it seems to work for nfs mounts. But at a remote ssh folder it doesn't seem to work, just nothing happens when dragging the file into it. Using the extract button in file-roller works fine for the way that matters.

[mangar (mycrapaccount-deactivatedaccount)]

+1 for applying the patch by default. since gutsy is a test release, no harm will be done if harm will be done..
In the worst case, remove the patch before final release.

pretty please, with QA on top?

[Glenn (glenn-v)]

I tested the patch as well, works great.

[Michael-250 (michael-250)]

I have tested nautilus + file-roller patch with file-roller version 2.19.92.
Dnd to smb or ssh share does _not_ work! I can drag a file from file-roller to this share (I don't get an error msg), but the file isn't "unzipped".

Before applying file-roller patch (only nautilus patch), I got an error/warning that extraction to this share (smb or ssh) is not possible.
I still think that this nautilus patch should be integrated in gutsy! But the file-roller patch should be reworked to solve the mentioned problems! Otherwise someoune could be irritated, because dnd doesn't work like it should (and no error/warning occurs)!

[Robbert (robbertkrebbers)]

The problem that dnd to a nfs mount doesn't work have to do with the following issue: http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=475296 and https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/file-roller/+bug/138486

Because file-roller threats nfs mounts as remote and shouldn't do that because nfs mounts are transparent. I have attached the patch for that issue.

[Murat Gunes (mgunes)]

Setting "Fix Committed".

http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=171655#c44

> Comment #44 from Alexander Larsson (nautilus developer, points: 21)
> 2007-09-10 10:47 UTC [reply]

> I've commited XDS support losely based on Amos patch.
> However, it doesn't yet support dnd to the list view.

[amano (jyaku)]

Just to clarify: Up until now the fix has been only committed to the Nautilus trunk.

[Amos Brocco (mriya3)]

I've added another patch to fix dnd also for the list/tree view

http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=171655#c46

testers are welcome

[Ralf Nieuwenhuijsen (ralf-nieuwenhuijsen)]

Are there binary packages that we can try out? Like a PPA archive?

[Bruce Cowan (bruce89-deactivatedaccount)]

I may soon provide packages at https://launchpad.net/~bruce89/+archive

[Bruce Cowan (bruce89-deactivatedaccount)]

On Fri, 2007-09-14 at 17:37 +0000, Bruce Cowan wrote:
> I may soon provide packages at https://launchpad.net/~bruce89/+archive
>
In fact, not until LP allows non-beta team members to have PPAs.
--
Bruce Cowan <https://launchpad.net/~bruce89/>

[Will Farrington (wcfarrington)]

Gutsy users can test packages here:

deb http://ppa.launchpad.net/wcfarrington/ubuntu/ gutsy main
deb-src http://ppa.launchpad.net/wcfarrington/ubuntu/ gutsy main

These are the exact same as what's in main now, but with the XDN patch and the related XDS treeview patch (to make listview work with Drag+Drop).

[Sebastien Bacher (seb128)]

nautilus (1:2.20.0-0ubuntu1) gutsy; urgency=low

  * New upstream version:
    - Load thumbnails asynchronously (LP: #26198)
    - Support direct save DnD (XDS) (LP: #13199)
    - Fix up octal permission display
    - Store window keep-above and stickines state across sessions

 -- Sebastien Bacher <email address hidden> Tue, 18 Sep 2007 12:29:55 +0200

[Robert Hrovat (robi-hipnos)]

Finaly! DnD works! Thanks guys :-)

[Achim (ach1m)]

Sorry that I have to say that, but Drag+Drop doesn't work with listview in nautilus.

Maybe someone can confirm this.

So it seems that the XDS treeview patch is not applied to latest nautilus.

[Will Farrington (wcfarrington)]

You are correct - the XDS treeview patch (also in Bugzilla) has not been applied to these packages. =(

[Sebastien Bacher (seb128)]

it has not been applied upstream neither

[Renzo Carbonara (k0001)]

after all these years, it's working perfectly for me =), since final gnome 2.20

[Sebastien Bacher (seb128)]

The file-roller issue have been fixed, there might still be a bug with the nautlus listview code though

[Amos Brocco (mriya3)]

There already exist a patch for listview (http://bugzilla.gnome.org/attachment.cgi?id=95584), but it has not yet been included.

[Sebastien Bacher (seb128)]

The patch should probably be sent on the nautilus mailing list, the maintainers don't cope with the bugzilla activity and use the list for patches reviews

[Amos Brocco (mriya3)]

I've already done it :)

http://mail.gnome.org/archives/nautilus-list/2007-September/msg00037.html

[Ivan Ivanoff (spammeroff)]

I confirm this bug in Gutsy! I can not take files and drop them in folder. DnD does not work.

[Rob van der Linde (robvdl)]

I've had no major problems with dnd in fileroller and Gutsy, seems to work fine for me... except on root nautilus windows.

what I mean, if I was to type in a terminal "sudo nautilus", browse to a folder where a .tar.gz file is located, double click on it (which theoretically should open file-roller as root as well). Then I cannot drag and drop from that instance of file roller to the root nautilus window.

For now I am still able to type "sudo file-roller filename.tar.gz" and hit the "extract" button as a workaround.

Other than that, drag and drop works no problem when running as the standard user.

[Amos Brocco (mriya3)]

this is strange, because I'm able to do it:

1. sudo nautilus
2. double-click on an archive from the "root" nautilus window
3. drag some file from file-roller to the nautilus "root" window ... Works
4. drag some file to a "normal" nautilus window... Works

[Rob van der Linde (robvdl)]

I can confirm that it works now, sorry, my bad.

Last time I tried it must have been Gutsy RC instead of final, that's the only explanation I can think of why it didn't work for me before.

I did:

sudo nautilus
double click on a .tar.gz (a gtk theme to be exact)
drag into a folder only root can write to (/usr/share/themes)

Works no problem now.

[Ivan Ivanoff (spammeroff)]

So what the error we have in file-roller? Maybe is it better to set something in some config? My system even hangs when I try to carry a file or a folder from archive to my desktop using DnD (intel915G, Ubuntu 7.10).

[nyékhelyi gábor (n0gabor)]

DnD to Nautilus listview still needs to be implemented. (I hope it'll be ready for Hardy)

[Daniel Pirch (dpirch)]

Drag and drop to Nautilus list view still doesn't work in Intrepid.

[falstaff (falstaff)]

Drag and Drop with Nautilus ListView doesnt work for me too! Would be nice if this bug gets fixed in Jaunty...

[Rebecca Menessec (aloishammer-deactivatedaccount)]

[Jaunty] This is not working in listview mode for me, either. No DnD at all-- the "document" icon being dragged zips back to File Roller and nothing happens.

[-z- (z-nexuizninjaz)]

Sure, you can drag and drop to list view in Thunar but it's simply too lightweight for everyday use and I'd rather not open Thunar every time I'd like to drag and drop out of a zip. Switching to icon view is a time-waster and general annoyance.

[-z- (z-nexuizninjaz)]

Yay, drop and drop out of archives to list view is fixed in Ubuntu Juanty 9.04!