Comment 6 for bug 996574

I agree -- I think the fix should be done on the build server just limited
to the Ubuntu packaging portion of the sconscript. Maybe we can include
build.h when we build the source tarball.

On Sat, Jun 9, 2012 at 11:56 AM, Daniel Schürmann <<email address hidden>
> wrote:

> Hi RJ,
>
> Ok, my new lastbzrbuild.h is a candidate for continuous conflicts. So this
> solution is more annoying then it helps for now.
> We should consider how we can put this file in our official source package
> and triag the tracability in case of Launchpad tarball downloads.
>
> I think a scons option, only set by our build server could be a solution.
> What do you think?
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Daniel
>
> --
> You received this bug notification because you are a member of Mixxx
> Development Team, which is subscribed to Mixxx.
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/996574
>
> Title:
> bzr revision not displayed in builds from
> http://builds.mixxx.org/builds/trunk/
>
> To manage notifications about this bug go to:
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/mixxx/+bug/996574/+subscriptions
>