Activity log for bug #1980264

Date Who What changed Old value New value Message
2022-06-29 19:06:03 Nicolas MURE bug added bug
2022-06-29 19:40:13 Nicolas MURE description Hello, Bug appears on Mixxx 2.3.3 (I installed it via flatpak, but I suspect all the other distributions ways are affected). Steps to reproduce : - Load a track on a DVS deck. - Play the track and set multiple hotcues. - Press the CUE button : the playback stops and the cursor position goes back to the CUE point. All good so far. - Press any hotcues previously set : the cursor moves to the hotcue, but the waveform is not updated (i.e. the cursor is still displayed on the CUE position due to the lack of waveform rendering update, but the cursor position is actually on the pressed hotcue). Press play : the waveform is rendered as usual with the cursor position starting from the pressed hotcue (feels like a jump due to the lack of rendering in the previous step). Mixxx 2.3.2 was fine, I suspect https://github.com/mixxxdj/mixxx/pull/4789 and https://github.com/mixxxdj/mixxx/pull/4791 to be the cause of the issue. Why in these PRs there is no check about `passthrough` mode if the passthrough was the issue (i.e. like https://github.com/mixxxdj/mixxx/pull/4787 has attempted to do) ? Thank you for your help :) Hello, Bug appears on Mixxx 2.3.3 (I installed it via flatpak, but I suspect all the other distributions ways are affected). Steps to reproduce : - Load a track on a DVS deck. - Play the track and set multiple hotcues. - Press the CUE button : the playback stops and the cursor position goes back to the CUE point. All good so far. - Press any hotcues previously set : the cursor moves to the hotcue, but the waveform is not updated (i.e. the cursor is still displayed on the CUE position due to the lack of waveform rendering update, but the cursor position is actually on the pressed hotcue). Press play : the waveform is rendered as usual with the cursor position starting from the pressed hotcue (feels like a jump due to the lack of rendering in the previous step). Mixxx 2.3.2 was fine, I suspect https://github.com/mixxxdj/mixxx/pull/4789 and https://github.com/mixxxdj/mixxx/pull/4791 to be the cause of the issue. Why in these PRs there is no check about `passthrough` mode if the passthrough was the issue (i.e. like https://github.com/mixxxdj/mixxx/pull/4787 has attempted to do) ? Note : I'm not using the passthrough mode. Thank you for your help :)
2022-07-08 14:27:39 Daniel Schürmann tags dvs passthrough rendering waveform passthrough waveform
2022-10-08 21:49:09 Swiftb0y bug watch added https://github.com/mixxxdj/mixxx/issues/10764
2022-10-08 21:49:10 Swiftb0y lock status Unlocked Comment-only