| 2013-08-28 07:28:39 |
Daniel Schürmann |
bug |
|
|
added bug |
| 2013-09-18 00:21:35 |
RAWRR |
summary |
Improve rotary control with a single touch device |
rotary dial control on touchscreen devices is wrong |
|
| 2013-09-18 00:29:00 |
RAWRR |
description |
Controlling the rotaries with a single touch device is a just bad.
This is because using Mouse, the Mouse cursor is snapped .. But a finger cannot be snapped ;-)
This original reported in Bug #1152572 including a demonstration video. |
Controlling a rotary dial on a touch device is really bad to the point of being almost useless (interestingly, slider controls work fine and as you would expect).
This *might* be because while using Mouse, the cursor is snapped, but a finger controlled cursor cannot be? ;-)
This was originally reported in a comment at Bug #1152572, which included (in an attachment) a video demonstrating general responsiveness of Mixxx to a touchscreen, and also showed the dials' unresponsiveness which prompted the filing of this bug. |
|
| 2013-09-18 00:30:12 |
RAWRR |
bug |
|
|
added subscriber RAWRR |
| 2013-09-18 00:33:11 |
RAWRR |
description |
Controlling a rotary dial on a touch device is really bad to the point of being almost useless (interestingly, slider controls work fine and as you would expect).
This *might* be because while using Mouse, the cursor is snapped, but a finger controlled cursor cannot be? ;-)
This was originally reported in a comment at Bug #1152572, which included (in an attachment) a video demonstrating general responsiveness of Mixxx to a touchscreen, and also showed the dials' unresponsiveness which prompted the filing of this bug. |
Controlling a rotary dial on currently tested touchscreen devices is really bad to the point of being almost useless (interestingly, slider controls work fine and as you would expect).
This *might* be because while using Mouse, the cursor is snapped, but a finger controlled cursor cannot be? ;-)
This was originally reported in a comment at Bug #1152572, which included (in an attachment) a video demonstrating general responsiveness of Mixxx to a touchscreen, and also showed the dials' unresponsiveness which prompted the filing of this bug. |
|
| 2013-09-18 00:33:43 |
RAWRR |
description |
Controlling a rotary dial on currently tested touchscreen devices is really bad to the point of being almost useless (interestingly, slider controls work fine and as you would expect).
This *might* be because while using Mouse, the cursor is snapped, but a finger controlled cursor cannot be? ;-)
This was originally reported in a comment at Bug #1152572, which included (in an attachment) a video demonstrating general responsiveness of Mixxx to a touchscreen, and also showed the dials' unresponsiveness which prompted the filing of this bug. |
Controlling a Mixxx rotary dial on currently tested touchscreen devices is really bad to the point of being almost useless (interestingly, slider controls work fine and as you would expect).
This *might* be because while using Mouse, the cursor is snapped, but a finger controlled cursor cannot be? ;-)
This was originally reported in a comment at Bug #1152572, which included (in an attachment) a video demonstrating general responsiveness of Mixxx to a touchscreen, and also showed the dials' unresponsiveness which prompted the filing of this bug. |
|
| 2013-09-18 00:34:46 |
RAWRR |
description |
Controlling a Mixxx rotary dial on currently tested touchscreen devices is really bad to the point of being almost useless (interestingly, slider controls work fine and as you would expect).
This *might* be because while using Mouse, the cursor is snapped, but a finger controlled cursor cannot be? ;-)
This was originally reported in a comment at Bug #1152572, which included (in an attachment) a video demonstrating general responsiveness of Mixxx to a touchscreen, and also showed the dials' unresponsiveness which prompted the filing of this bug. |
Controlling a Mixxx rotary dial via currently tested touchscreens is really bad to the point of being almost useless (interestingly, slider controls work fine and as you would expect).
This *might* be because while using Mouse, the cursor is snapped, but a finger controlled cursor cannot be? ;-)
This was originally reported in a comment at Bug #1152572, which included (in an attachment) a video demonstrating general responsiveness of Mixxx to a touchscreen, and also showed the dials' unresponsiveness which prompted the filing of this bug. |
|
| 2013-09-18 00:37:54 |
RAWRR |
tags |
|
dial gui rotary skin touch touchscreen ui |
|
| 2013-09-18 00:42:23 |
RAWRR |
description |
Controlling a Mixxx rotary dial via currently tested touchscreens is really bad to the point of being almost useless (interestingly, slider controls work fine and as you would expect).
This *might* be because while using Mouse, the cursor is snapped, but a finger controlled cursor cannot be? ;-)
This was originally reported in a comment at Bug #1152572, which included (in an attachment) a video demonstrating general responsiveness of Mixxx to a touchscreen, and also showed the dials' unresponsiveness which prompted the filing of this bug. |
Controlling a Mixxx rotary dial via currently tested touchscreens is really bad to the point of being almost useless (interestingly, slider controls work fine and as you would expect).
This *might* be because while using Mouse, the cursor is snapped, but a finger controlled cursor cannot be? ;-)
This was originally reported in a comment at Bug #1152572, which included (in an attachment) a video demonstrating general responsiveness of Mixxx to a touchscreen, which also showed the dials' unresponsiveness which prompted the filing of this bug. |
|
| 2013-09-18 00:42:36 |
RAWRR |
tags |
dial gui rotary skin touch touchscreen ui |
dial dials gui rotary skin touch touchscreen ui |
|
| 2013-09-18 00:43:18 |
RAWRR |
description |
Controlling a Mixxx rotary dial via currently tested touchscreens is really bad to the point of being almost useless (interestingly, slider controls work fine and as you would expect).
This *might* be because while using Mouse, the cursor is snapped, but a finger controlled cursor cannot be? ;-)
This was originally reported in a comment at Bug #1152572, which included (in an attachment) a video demonstrating general responsiveness of Mixxx to a touchscreen, which also showed the dials' unresponsiveness which prompted the filing of this bug. |
Controlling a Mixxx rotary dial via currently tested touchscreens is really bad to the point of being almost useless (interestingly, slider controls work fine and as you would expect).
This *might* be because while using a mouse, the cursor is snapped, but a finger controlled cursor cannot be? ;-)
This was originally reported in a comment at Bug #1152572, which included (in an attachment) a video demonstrating general responsiveness of Mixxx to a touchscreen, which also showed the dials' unresponsiveness which prompted the filing of this bug. |
|
| 2013-09-18 00:43:51 |
RAWRR |
description |
Controlling a Mixxx rotary dial via currently tested touchscreens is really bad to the point of being almost useless (interestingly, slider controls work fine and as you would expect).
This *might* be because while using a mouse, the cursor is snapped, but a finger controlled cursor cannot be? ;-)
This was originally reported in a comment at Bug #1152572, which included (in an attachment) a video demonstrating general responsiveness of Mixxx to a touchscreen, which also showed the dials' unresponsiveness which prompted the filing of this bug. |
Controlling a Mixxx rotary dial via currently tested touchscreens is really bad to the point of being almost useless (interestingly, slider controls work fine and as you would expect).
This *might* be because while using a mouse, the cursor is snapped, but a finger controlled cursor is not for some reason? ;-)
This was originally reported in a comment at Bug #1152572, which included (in an attachment) a video demonstrating general responsiveness of Mixxx to a touchscreen, which also showed the dials' unresponsiveness which prompted the filing of this bug. |
|
| 2013-09-18 00:44:55 |
RAWRR |
summary |
rotary dial control on touchscreen devices is wrong |
rotary dial control via touchscreen is wrong |
|
| 2013-09-18 00:45:27 |
RAWRR |
description |
Controlling a Mixxx rotary dial via currently tested touchscreens is really bad to the point of being almost useless (interestingly, slider controls work fine and as you would expect).
This *might* be because while using a mouse, the cursor is snapped, but a finger controlled cursor is not for some reason? ;-)
This was originally reported in a comment at Bug #1152572, which included (in an attachment) a video demonstrating general responsiveness of Mixxx to a touchscreen, which also showed the dials' unresponsiveness which prompted the filing of this bug. |
Controlling a Mixxx rotary dial via currently tested touchscreens is really bad to the point of being almost useless (interestingly, slider controls work fine and as you would expect).
This *might* be because while using a mouse, the cursor is snapped, but a finger controlled cursor is not for some reason? ;-)
This was originally reported in a comment at bug #1152572, which included (in an attachment) a video demonstrating general responsiveness of Mixxx to a touchscreen, which also showed the dials' unresponsiveness which prompted the filing of this bug. |
|
| 2013-09-18 00:47:00 |
RAWRR |
tags |
dial dials gui rotary skin touch touchscreen ui |
dial dials gui multitouch rotary skin touch touchscreen ui |
|
| 2013-09-18 02:46:51 |
RAWRR |
description |
Controlling a Mixxx rotary dial via currently tested touchscreens is really bad to the point of being almost useless (interestingly, slider controls work fine and as you would expect).
This *might* be because while using a mouse, the cursor is snapped, but a finger controlled cursor is not for some reason? ;-)
This was originally reported in a comment at bug #1152572, which included (in an attachment) a video demonstrating general responsiveness of Mixxx to a touchscreen, which also showed the dials' unresponsiveness which prompted the filing of this bug. |
Controlling a Mixxx rotary dial via currently tested touchscreens is really bad to the point of being almost useless (interestingly, slider controls work fine and as you would expect).
This *might* be because while using a mouse, the cursor is snapped, but a finger controlled cursor is not for some reason? ;-)
This was originally reported in a comment at Bug #1152572, which included (in an attachment) a video demonstrating general responsiveness of Mixxx to a touchscreen, which also showed the dials' unresponsiveness which prompted the filing of this bug. |
|
| 2013-09-19 14:01:47 |
RAWRR |
description |
Controlling a Mixxx rotary dial via currently tested touchscreens is really bad to the point of being almost useless (interestingly, slider controls work fine and as you would expect).
This *might* be because while using a mouse, the cursor is snapped, but a finger controlled cursor is not for some reason? ;-)
This was originally reported in a comment at Bug #1152572, which included (in an attachment) a video demonstrating general responsiveness of Mixxx to a touchscreen, which also showed the dials' unresponsiveness which prompted the filing of this bug. |
Controlling a Mixxx rotary dial via currently tested touchscreens is really bad to the point of being almost useless (interestingly, slider controls work fine and as you would expect).
This *might* be because while using a mouse, the cursor is snapped, but a finger controlled cursor is not for some reason? ;-)
This was originally reported in a comment at Bug #1152572, which included (in an attachment) a video demonstrating general responsiveness of Mixxx to a touchscreen, which also showed the dials' unresponsiveness which prompted the filing of this bug.
However, I'd like it if this were *not* considered a child bug of Bug #1152572, for the reason that this rotary dial bug is the only thing as far as I can tell that substantially stands in the way of complete singletouch facility in Mixxx. If this bug is fixed, as far as I can tell Mixxx will work with any old touchscreen as well as they were meant to use any program, and that would be nice to cross off the list - single touch functionality: done. Onward the multitouch. |
|
| 2013-09-19 14:07:03 |
RAWRR |
description |
Controlling a Mixxx rotary dial via currently tested touchscreens is really bad to the point of being almost useless (interestingly, slider controls work fine and as you would expect).
This *might* be because while using a mouse, the cursor is snapped, but a finger controlled cursor is not for some reason? ;-)
This was originally reported in a comment at Bug #1152572, which included (in an attachment) a video demonstrating general responsiveness of Mixxx to a touchscreen, which also showed the dials' unresponsiveness which prompted the filing of this bug.
However, I'd like it if this were *not* considered a child bug of Bug #1152572, for the reason that this rotary dial bug is the only thing as far as I can tell that substantially stands in the way of complete singletouch facility in Mixxx. If this bug is fixed, as far as I can tell Mixxx will work with any old touchscreen as well as they were meant to use any program, and that would be nice to cross off the list - single touch functionality: done. Onward the multitouch. |
Controlling a Mixxx rotary dial via currently tested touchscreens is really bad to the point of being almost useless (interestingly, slider controls work fine and as you would expect).
This *might* be because while using a mouse, the cursor is snapped, but a finger controlled cursor is not for some reason? ;-)
This was originally reported in a comment at Bug #1152572, which included (in an attachment) a video demonstrating general responsiveness of Mixxx to a touchscreen, which also showed the dials' unresponsiveness which prompted the filing of this bug.
However, I'd like it if this were *not* considered a child bug of Bug #1152572, but rather standing on its own as a singletouch bug that as an added bonus will probably have the benefit of preemptively fixing a multitouch bug. As far as I can tell, this bug is the only one that substantially stands in the way of complete singletouch facility in Mixxx. If this bug is fixed, I'm pretty sure Mixxx will work with any old monotouch touchscreen as well as they were meant to use any program. It would be nice to cross off the list - single touch functionality: done. Onward the multitouch. |
|
| 2013-09-19 14:11:29 |
RAWRR |
description |
Controlling a Mixxx rotary dial via currently tested touchscreens is really bad to the point of being almost useless (interestingly, slider controls work fine and as you would expect).
This *might* be because while using a mouse, the cursor is snapped, but a finger controlled cursor is not for some reason? ;-)
This was originally reported in a comment at Bug #1152572, which included (in an attachment) a video demonstrating general responsiveness of Mixxx to a touchscreen, which also showed the dials' unresponsiveness which prompted the filing of this bug.
However, I'd like it if this were *not* considered a child bug of Bug #1152572, but rather standing on its own as a singletouch bug that as an added bonus will probably have the benefit of preemptively fixing a multitouch bug. As far as I can tell, this bug is the only one that substantially stands in the way of complete singletouch facility in Mixxx. If this bug is fixed, I'm pretty sure Mixxx will work with any old monotouch touchscreen as well as they were meant to use any program. It would be nice to cross off the list - single touch functionality: done. Onward the multitouch. |
Controlling a Mixxx rotary dial via currently tested touchscreens is really bad to the point of being almost useless (interestingly, slider controls work fine and as you would expect).
This *might* be because while using a mouse, the cursor is snapped, but a finger controlled cursor is not for some reason? ;-)
This was originally reported in a comment at Bug #1152572, which included (in an attachment) a video demonstrating general responsiveness of Mixxx to a touchscreen, which also showed the dials' unresponsiveness which prompted the filing of this bug.
However, I'd like it if this were *not* considered a child bug of Bug #1152572, but rather standing on its own as a singletouch bug (that as an added bonus will probably have the benefit of preemptively fixing a multitouch bug). As far as I can tell, this bug is the only one that substantially stands in the way of conclusive singletouch facility. If fixed, I think Mixxx will work with any oldschool monotouch touchscreen (as well as they were meant to use any program).
I think it would be encouraging to be able to cross off the list - single touch functionality: done. Onward to multitouch. |
|
| 2013-09-19 14:12:03 |
RAWRR |
description |
Controlling a Mixxx rotary dial via currently tested touchscreens is really bad to the point of being almost useless (interestingly, slider controls work fine and as you would expect).
This *might* be because while using a mouse, the cursor is snapped, but a finger controlled cursor is not for some reason? ;-)
This was originally reported in a comment at Bug #1152572, which included (in an attachment) a video demonstrating general responsiveness of Mixxx to a touchscreen, which also showed the dials' unresponsiveness which prompted the filing of this bug.
However, I'd like it if this were *not* considered a child bug of Bug #1152572, but rather standing on its own as a singletouch bug (that as an added bonus will probably have the benefit of preemptively fixing a multitouch bug). As far as I can tell, this bug is the only one that substantially stands in the way of conclusive singletouch facility. If fixed, I think Mixxx will work with any oldschool monotouch touchscreen (as well as they were meant to use any program).
I think it would be encouraging to be able to cross off the list - single touch functionality: done. Onward to multitouch. |
Controlling a Mixxx rotary dial via currently tested touchscreens is really bad to the point of being almost useless (interestingly, slider controls work fine and as you would expect).
This *might* be because while using a mouse, the cursor is snapped, but a finger controlled cursor is not for some reason? ;-)
This was originally reported in a comment at Bug #1152572, which included (in an attachment) a video demonstrating general responsiveness of Mixxx to a touchscreen, which also showed the dials' unresponsiveness which prompted the filing of this bug.
However, I'd like it if this were *not* considered a child of Bug #1152572, but rather standing on its own as a singletouch bug (that as an added bonus will probably have the benefit of preemptively fixing a multitouch bug). As far as I can tell, this bug is the only one that substantially stands in the way of conclusive singletouch facility. If fixed, I think Mixxx will work with any oldschool monotouch touchscreen (as well as they were meant to use any program).
I think it would be encouraging to be able to cross off the list - single touch functionality: done. Onward to multitouch. |
|
| 2013-09-19 14:14:18 |
RAWRR |
description |
Controlling a Mixxx rotary dial via currently tested touchscreens is really bad to the point of being almost useless (interestingly, slider controls work fine and as you would expect).
This *might* be because while using a mouse, the cursor is snapped, but a finger controlled cursor is not for some reason? ;-)
This was originally reported in a comment at Bug #1152572, which included (in an attachment) a video demonstrating general responsiveness of Mixxx to a touchscreen, which also showed the dials' unresponsiveness which prompted the filing of this bug.
However, I'd like it if this were *not* considered a child of Bug #1152572, but rather standing on its own as a singletouch bug (that as an added bonus will probably have the benefit of preemptively fixing a multitouch bug). As far as I can tell, this bug is the only one that substantially stands in the way of conclusive singletouch facility. If fixed, I think Mixxx will work with any oldschool monotouch touchscreen (as well as they were meant to use any program).
I think it would be encouraging to be able to cross off the list - single touch functionality: done. Onward to multitouch. |
Controlling a Mixxx rotary dial via currently tested touchscreens is really bad to the point of being almost useless (interestingly, slider controls work fine and as you would expect).
This *might* be because while using a mouse, the cursor is snapped, but a finger controlled cursor is not for some reason? ;-)
This was originally reported in a comment at Bug #1152572, which included (in an attachment) a video demonstrating general responsiveness of Mixxx to a touchscreen, which also showed the dials' unresponsiveness which prompted the filing of this bug.
However, I'd like it if this were *not* considered a child of Bug #1152572, but rather standing on its own as a singletouch bug (that as an added bonus will probably have the benefit of preemptively fixing a multitouch bug). As far as I can tell, this bug is the only one that substantially stands in the way of conclusive singletouch facility. If fixed, I think any oldschool monotouch touchscreenwill work competently with Mixxx (at least as well as they were meant to use any program).
I think it would be encouraging to be able to cross off the list - single touch functionality: done. Onward to multitouch. |
|
| 2013-09-19 14:14:57 |
RAWRR |
description |
Controlling a Mixxx rotary dial via currently tested touchscreens is really bad to the point of being almost useless (interestingly, slider controls work fine and as you would expect).
This *might* be because while using a mouse, the cursor is snapped, but a finger controlled cursor is not for some reason? ;-)
This was originally reported in a comment at Bug #1152572, which included (in an attachment) a video demonstrating general responsiveness of Mixxx to a touchscreen, which also showed the dials' unresponsiveness which prompted the filing of this bug.
However, I'd like it if this were *not* considered a child of Bug #1152572, but rather standing on its own as a singletouch bug (that as an added bonus will probably have the benefit of preemptively fixing a multitouch bug). As far as I can tell, this bug is the only one that substantially stands in the way of conclusive singletouch facility. If fixed, I think any oldschool monotouch touchscreenwill work competently with Mixxx (at least as well as they were meant to use any program).
I think it would be encouraging to be able to cross off the list - single touch functionality: done. Onward to multitouch. |
Controlling a Mixxx rotary dial via currently tested touchscreens is really bad to the point of being almost useless (interestingly, slider controls work fine and as you would expect).
This *might* be because while using a mouse, the cursor is snapped, but a finger controlled cursor is not for some reason? ;-)
This was originally reported in a comment at Bug #1152572, which included (in an attachment) a video demonstrating general responsiveness of Mixxx to a touchscreen, which also showed the dials' unresponsiveness which prompted the filing of this bug.
However, I'd like it if this were *not* considered a child of Bug #1152572, but rather standing on its own as a singletouch bug (that as an added bonus will probably have the benefit of preemptively fixing a multitouch bug). As far as I can tell, this bug is the only one that substantially stands in the way of conclusive singletouch facility. If fixed, I think any oldschool monotouch touchscreen will work competently with Mixxx (at least as well as they were meant to use any program).
I think it would be encouraging to be able to cross off the list - single touch functionality: done. Onward to multitouch. |
|
| 2013-09-19 14:15:50 |
RAWRR |
description |
Controlling a Mixxx rotary dial via currently tested touchscreens is really bad to the point of being almost useless (interestingly, slider controls work fine and as you would expect).
This *might* be because while using a mouse, the cursor is snapped, but a finger controlled cursor is not for some reason? ;-)
This was originally reported in a comment at Bug #1152572, which included (in an attachment) a video demonstrating general responsiveness of Mixxx to a touchscreen, which also showed the dials' unresponsiveness which prompted the filing of this bug.
However, I'd like it if this were *not* considered a child of Bug #1152572, but rather standing on its own as a singletouch bug (that as an added bonus will probably have the benefit of preemptively fixing a multitouch bug). As far as I can tell, this bug is the only one that substantially stands in the way of conclusive singletouch facility. If fixed, I think any oldschool monotouch touchscreen will work competently with Mixxx (at least as well as they were meant to use any program).
I think it would be encouraging to be able to cross off the list - single touch functionality: done. Onward to multitouch. |
Controlling a Mixxx rotary dial via currently tested touchscreens is really bad to the point of being almost useless (interestingly, slider controls work fine and as you would expect).
This *might* be because while using a mouse, the cursor is snapped, but a finger controlled cursor is not for some reason? ;-)
This was originally reported in a comment at Bug #1152572, which included (in an attachment) a video demonstrating general responsiveness of Mixxx to a touchscreen, which also showed the dials' unresponsiveness which prompted the filing of this bug.
However, I'd like it if this were *not* considered a child of Bug #1152572, but rather standing on its own as a singletouch bug (that as an added bonus will probably have the benefit of preemptively fixing a multitouch bug). As far as I can tell, this bug is the only one that substantially stands in the way of conclusive singletouch facility. If fixed, I think any oldschool monotouch touchscreen will work competently with Mixxx (at least as well as they were meant to work with any program).
It would be encouraging to be able to cross off the list - single touch functionality: done. Onward to multitouch. |
|
| 2013-09-19 14:17:02 |
RAWRR |
description |
Controlling a Mixxx rotary dial via currently tested touchscreens is really bad to the point of being almost useless (interestingly, slider controls work fine and as you would expect).
This *might* be because while using a mouse, the cursor is snapped, but a finger controlled cursor is not for some reason? ;-)
This was originally reported in a comment at Bug #1152572, which included (in an attachment) a video demonstrating general responsiveness of Mixxx to a touchscreen, which also showed the dials' unresponsiveness which prompted the filing of this bug.
However, I'd like it if this were *not* considered a child of Bug #1152572, but rather standing on its own as a singletouch bug (that as an added bonus will probably have the benefit of preemptively fixing a multitouch bug). As far as I can tell, this bug is the only one that substantially stands in the way of conclusive singletouch facility. If fixed, I think any oldschool monotouch touchscreen will work competently with Mixxx (at least as well as they were meant to work with any program).
It would be encouraging to be able to cross off the list - single touch functionality: done. Onward to multitouch. |
Controlling a Mixxx rotary dial via currently tested touchscreens is really bad to the point of being almost useless (interestingly, slider controls work fine and as you would expect).
This *might* be because while using a mouse, the cursor is snapped, but a finger controlled cursor is not for some reason? ;-)
This was originally reported in a comment at Bug #1152572, which included (in an attachment) a video demonstrating general responsiveness of Mixxx to a touchscreen, which also showed the dials' unresponsiveness which prompted the filing of this bug.
However, I'd like it if this were *not* considered a child of Bug #1152572, but rather standing on its own as a singletouch bug (that as an added bonus will probably have the benefit of preemptively fixing a multitouch bug). As far as I can tell, this bug is the only one that substantially stands in the way of conclusive singletouch facility. If fixed, I think any oldschool monotouch touchscreen will work competently with Mixxx (at least as well as they were meant to work with any program).
It would be encouraging to be able to cross off the list - single touch functionality: dominated. Onward to multitouch. |
|
| 2013-09-19 14:18:05 |
RAWRR |
description |
Controlling a Mixxx rotary dial via currently tested touchscreens is really bad to the point of being almost useless (interestingly, slider controls work fine and as you would expect).
This *might* be because while using a mouse, the cursor is snapped, but a finger controlled cursor is not for some reason? ;-)
This was originally reported in a comment at Bug #1152572, which included (in an attachment) a video demonstrating general responsiveness of Mixxx to a touchscreen, which also showed the dials' unresponsiveness which prompted the filing of this bug.
However, I'd like it if this were *not* considered a child of Bug #1152572, but rather standing on its own as a singletouch bug (that as an added bonus will probably have the benefit of preemptively fixing a multitouch bug). As far as I can tell, this bug is the only one that substantially stands in the way of conclusive singletouch facility. If fixed, I think any oldschool monotouch touchscreen will work competently with Mixxx (at least as well as they were meant to work with any program).
It would be encouraging to be able to cross off the list - single touch functionality: dominated. Onward to multitouch. |
Controlling a Mixxx rotary dial via currently tested touchscreens is really bad to the point of being almost useless (interestingly, slider controls work fine and as you would expect).
This *might* be because while using a mouse, the cursor is snapped, but a finger controlled cursor is not for some reason? ;-)
This was originally reported in a comment at Bug #1152572, which included (in an attachment) a video demonstrating general responsiveness of Mixxx to a touchscreen, which also showed the dials' unresponsiveness which prompted the filing of this bug.
However, I'd like it if this were *not* considered a child of Bug #1152572, but rather standing on its own as a singletouch bug (that as an added bonus will probably preemptively fix a multitouch bug). As far as I can tell, this bug is the only one that substantially stands in the way of conclusive singletouch facility. If fixed, I think any oldschool monotouch touchscreen will work competently with Mixxx (at least as well as they were meant to work with any program).
It would be encouraging to be able to cross off the list - single touch functionality: dominated. Onward to multitouch. |
|
| 2014-03-29 21:53:01 |
RJ Skerry-Ryan |
mixxx: importance |
Undecided |
Low |
|
| 2014-03-29 21:53:03 |
RJ Skerry-Ryan |
mixxx: status |
New |
Confirmed |
|
| 2019-07-22 06:31:45 |
Daniel Schürmann |
tags |
dial dials gui multitouch rotary skin touch touchscreen ui |
gui skin touch |
|
| 2020-05-10 21:04:07 |
Daniel Schürmann |
tags |
gui skin touch |
gui skin touchscreen |
|
| 2022-10-08 19:45:13 |
Swiftb0y |
bug watch added |
|
https://github.com/mixxxdj/mixxx/issues/7159 |
|
| 2022-10-08 19:45:14 |
Swiftb0y |
lock status |
Unlocked |
Comment-only |
|
