Filtered waveform should reflect EQ frequency ranges

Bug #1008243 reported by Sean M. Pappalardo
6
This bug affects 1 person
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
Mixxx
Triaged
Wishlist
Unassigned

Bug Description

The Filtered (GL) waveform should take the frequency ranges set for the EQs into account when it draws the separate components to more accurately reflect what's being heard. (A bit like how the cross-fader curve widget uses the actual curve function to accurately plot the graph.)

Tags: eq waveform
Revision history for this message
Thomas Vincent (vrince) wrote :

Keep in mind this means re-run waveform analysis any time you change frequency ranges.
Are frequency ranges intended to change a lot ?

Revision history for this message
Sean M. Pappalardo (pegasus-renegadetech) wrote :

Oh, yuck. I didn't realize that. Okay, triaging this unless/until we ever get an on-the-fly waveform renderer.

Changed in mixxx:
status: Confirmed → Triaged
Revision history for this message
RJ Skerry-Ryan (rryan) wrote : Re: [Bug 1008243] Re: Filtered waveform should reflect EQ frequency ranges

Hmm.. I don't think understand -- the bands take into account the frequency
ranges inherently since they are the result of the filter output. Under
what you're proposing, what would change about the waveform rendering?

On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 10:31 AM, Sean M. Pappalardo <
<email address hidden>> wrote:

> Oh, yuck. I didn't realize that. Okay, triaging this unless/until we
> ever get an on-the-fly waveform renderer.
>
> ** Changed in: mixxx
> Status: Confirmed => Triaged
>
> --
> You received this bug notification because you are a member of Mixxx
> Development Team, which is subscribed to Mixxx.
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1008243
>
> Title:
> Filtered waveform should reflect EQ frequency ranges
>
> To manage notifications about this bug go to:
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/mixxx/+bug/1008243/+subscriptions
>

Revision history for this message
Sean M. Pappalardo (pegasus-renegadetech) wrote :

I'm talking about changing the waveform in real-time while you tweak the non-static EQ cutoffs while one of the EQs is attenuated. (This is what a filter effect would essentially do.) It's more a fun thing than anything (though it would be more accurate to what's coming out of the speakers,) so it's not a big deal.

Revision history for this message
RJ Skerry-Ryan (rryan) wrote :

Ah ok -- I see. The computational requirements are too great here so I don't think we'll ever do what you described.

One related thing that might be good is to allow the user to customize the EQ settings that are used to generate the waveforms. Every time you change the setting all waveforms would have to be regenerated but we could just add a warning for that. (because of that, it would be a separate preference from the actual EQ settings that you could get to e.g. from a waveform preferences section)

tags: removed: gains
Revision history for this message
Swiftb0y (swiftb0y) wrote :

Mixxx now uses GitHub for bug tracking. This bug has been migrated to:
https://github.com/mixxxdj/mixxx/issues/6502

lock status: Metadata changes locked and limited to project staff
To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.