Mir

  1. Bug #1334287
  2. Comment #1

Comment 1 for bug 1334287

Revision history for this message
Alan Griffiths (alan-griffiths) wrote :

First a surface containing a TimeoutFrameDroppingPolicy is destroyed:

==1490== Address 0xd08d538 is 24 bytes inside a block of size 32 free'd
...
==1490== by 0x50C6D4B: mir::frontend::SessionMediator::release_surface(google::protobuf::RpcController*, mir::protobuf::SurfaceId const*, mir::protobuf::Void*, google::protobuf::Closure*) (session_mediator.cpp:266)

Then an alarm fires that tries to execute the lambda created in the TimeoutFrameDroppingPolicy constructor...

BANG!