MadSpin bug when deciding which particles need BR+width recalculation
Bug #1440939 reported by
Emanuele Usai
This bug affects 1 person
Affects | Status | Importance | Assigned to | Milestone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
MadGraph5_aMC@NLO |
Fix Released
|
Undecided
|
Unassigned |
Bug Description
Dear MadGraph Experts,
I am trying to use "unphysical" branching ratios in MadSpin (that is, disregarding the values obtained from the coupling parameters) by setting custom BR values in the param card below a DECAY statement for a given particle.
However I found this little bug: if the MadSpin card contains a decay statement with a multi-particle definition, then MS doesn't recognize the branching fractions in the param card coming from the particles contained in the multi-particle define.
One possible solution is in the attached patch, to be applied against [1].
Cheers,
Emanuele
[1] https:/
Changed in mg5amcnlo: | |
status: | New → Fix Committed |
Changed in mg5amcnlo: | |
status: | Fix Committed → Fix Released |
To post a comment you must log in.
Dear Emanuele,
Thanks a lot for this, this is wonderful.
I have apply it to our development version.
Cheers,
Olivier
On 07 Apr 2015, at 02:12, Emanuele Usai <email address hidden> wrote:
> Public bug reported: /code.launchpad .net/~maddevelo pers/mg5amcnlo/ MS_fix_ bug /bugs.launchpad .net/bugs/ 1440939/ +attachment/ 4368069/ +files/ decay.patch /bugs.launchpad .net/bugs/ 1440939 /code.launchpad .net/~maddevelo pers/mg5amcnlo/ MS_fix_ bug /bugs.launchpad .net/mg5amcnlo/ +bug/1440939/ +subscriptions
>
> Dear MadGraph Experts,
>
> I am trying to use "unphysical" branching ratios in MadSpin (that is,
> disregarding the values obtained from the coupling parameters) by
> setting custom BR values in the param card below a DECAY statement for a
> given particle.
>
> However I found this little bug: if the MadSpin card contains a decay
> statement with a multi-particle definition, then MS doesn't recognize
> the branching fractions in the param card coming from the particles
> contained in the multi-particle define.
>
> One possible solution is in the attached patch, to be applied against
> [1].
>
> Cheers,
> Emanuele
>
> [1] https:/
>
> ** Affects: mg5amcnlo
> Importance: Undecided
> Status: New
>
> ** Patch added: "decay.patch"
> https:/
>
> --
> You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to
> MadGraph5_aMC@NLO.
> https:/
>
> Title:
> MadSpin bug when deciding which particles need BR+width recalculation
>
> Status in MadGraph5_aMC@NLO Generator:
> New
>
> Bug description:
> Dear MadGraph Experts,
>
> I am trying to use "unphysical" branching ratios in MadSpin (that is,
> disregarding the values obtained from the coupling parameters) by
> setting custom BR values in the param card below a DECAY statement for
> a given particle.
>
> However I found this little bug: if the MadSpin card contains a decay
> statement with a multi-particle definition, then MS doesn't recognize
> the branching fractions in the param card coming from the particles
> contained in the multi-particle define.
>
> One possible solution is in the attached patch, to be applied against
> [1].
>
> Cheers,
> Emanuele
>
> [1] https:/
>
> To manage notifications about this bug go to:
> https:/