Comment 30 for bug 653619

Revision history for this message
Omer Akram (om26er) wrote : Re: [Bug 653619] Re: Please back port Evolution 2.32 to lucid LTS and maverick

Helder, please spam somewhere else

On Sun, Mar 13, 2011 at 8:23 PM, HelderPereira <email address hidden>wrote:

> Well, I never tought I would say this but change to Fedora...
>
> After around 10 releases of Ubuntu I changed exactly because of this...
>
>
> Helder Pereira @ GMail
>
>
> On 13 March 2011 11:43, HX_unbanned <email address hidden> wrote:
> > COme on!
> >
> > Backport 2.32.x to Maverick at ONCE!!! I do not understand why sometimes
> > Canonical devs IGNORES such obvious and needed steps to to.
> >
> > Do not want to be rude, but these situations really makes me bloody
> > angry ...
> >
> > --
> > You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
> > of the bug.
> > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/653619
> >
> > Title:
> > Please back port Evolution 2.32 to lucid LTS and maverick
> >
> > To unsubscribe from this bug, go to:
> > https://bugs.launchpad.net/lucid-backports/+bug/653619/+subscribe
> >
>
> --
> You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
> of the bug.
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/653619
>
> Title:
> Please back port Evolution 2.32 to lucid LTS and maverick
>
> Status in Lucid Backports:
> New
> Status in Maverick Backports:
> New
>
> Bug description:
> There are significant bug fixes in Evolution 2.32 that are needed if
> Evolution is to be considered a serious business e-mail client, e.g.
> https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=590976. I expect there are
> significant product feature advances as well, but I haven't figured
> out how to navigate the Gnome Evolution project history to identify
> them.
>
> I will happily test the backport as I use Evolution constantly.
>
> To unsubscribe from this bug, go to:
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/lucid-backports/+bug/653619/+subscribe
>