[doc] Check 'thin_provisioning' in extra specs
Affects | Status | Importance | Assigned to | Milestone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
OpenStack Shared File Systems Service (Manila) |
Fix Released
|
Low
|
Victoria Martinez de la Cruz |
Bug Description
https:/
Dear bug triager. This bug was created since a commit was marked with DOCIMPACT.
Your project "openstack/manila" is set up so that we directly report the documentation bugs against it. If this needs changing, the docimpact-group option needs to be added for the project. You can ask the OpenStack infra team (#openstack-infra on freenode) for help if you need to.
commit 83c93c776707d5d
Author: xing-yang <email address hidden>
Date: Wed May 11 15:23:31 2016 -0400
Check 'thin_provisioning' in extra specs
Currently in the capacity filter and weigher of the scheduler,
we use the logic to evaluate whether there is enough capacity
to thin provision a share on a backend if the driver reports
thin_
support both thin and thick provisioning. The logic does not
check whether the user wants the share to be provisioned as thin
or not.
In this patch, we check 'thin_provisioning' in extra specs of the
share type and decide whether to use the logic for thin or thick.
In the following two cases, we will use the thin logic:
1) 'thin_provisioning' is not set in extra specs. This is to
provide backward compatibility.
2) 'thin_provisioning' is set in extra specs and it is
'<is> True' or 'True'.
To provision a thick share on a backend that supports both
thin and thick, set one of the following in extra specs:
DocImpact
Change-Id: I238a7962425ea3
Closes-Bug: #1578718
Changed in manila: | |
assignee: | nobody → NidhiMittalHada (nidhimittal19) |
Changed in manila: | |
assignee: | NidhiMittalHada (nidhimittal19) → Victoria Martinez de la Cruz (vkmc) |
status: | New → Confirmed |
importance: | Wishlist → Low |
We need documentation around how the scheduling works with oversubscription. Any volunteers?