Hi, Mark. Thanks for the private email. I promise I won't abuse it.
Here is the header. Note particularly the reply-to:Reply-To:
<email address hidden>,
	<email address hidden>,
	Phil Muir <email address hidden>
 This was a direct copy-paste, & it's weird that the
<email address hidden> address contains an uppercase
letter. Do you have any idea what is occurring?


https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/h/rzsloxyya12s/?th=156001d8e1dccb49v=om

Delivered-To: <email address hidden>
Received: by 10.37.22.2 with SMTP id 2csp1271120ybw;
        Mon, 18 Jul 2016 15:25:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 10.66.144.200 with SMTP id so8mr10577521pab.94.1468880752243;
        Mon, 18 Jul 2016 15:25:52 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <email address hidden>
Received: from mailman.midimag-xt.org (mailman.midimag-xt.org. [107.170.199.86])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTP id ro7si28933425pab.251.2016.07.18.15.25.51;
        Mon, 18 Jul 2016 15:25:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of
<email address hidden> designates 107.170.199.86 as
permitted sender) client-ip=107.170.199.86;
Authentication-Results: mx.google.com;
       dkim=fail <email address hidden>;
       spf=pass (google.com: domain of
<email address hidden> designates 107.170.199.86 as
permitted sender)
<email address hidden>
Received: from mailman.midimag-xt.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by mailman.midimag-xt.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14E1412403B;
	Mon, 18 Jul 2016 15:25:51 -0700 (MST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=mailman.midimag-xt.org; s=mailman; t=1468880751;
	bh=LWN5eghNrqijU7VjrNrEV2Wej3+KA03rqZ77M+Cv4+Y=;
	h=In-Reply-To:References:Date:To:Subject:From:Reply-To:List-Id:
	 List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe:
	 Sender:From;
	b=Qb2gdCszjPsfJU8z/Qy48U+sXvRUY6RetxvxhAlCa73r0XRKsH6S97bdXA+//He6w
	 B9lYmU7pHWP5W32Mserx2bMFzrNYh1HzFFsJhvwzwaNtpDqe3ovPjsInb7/YKcQ3xI
	 De0WpTiAar0u/+qEKajU3ZuwSSv2nfPR6aH5O0js=
X-Original-To: <email address hidden>
Delivered-To: <email address hidden>
Received: from outbound44.dataflame.com (outbound44.dataflame.com
 [91.103.219.62])
 by mailman.midimag-xt.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 726BF12402A
 for <email address hidden>; Mon, 18 Jul 2016 15:25:40 -0700 (MST)
X-Virus-Scanned: by SpamTitan at dataflame.co.uk
Received: from [2.216.153.142] (port=60675 helo=android-6c0a3f0408928b1b)
 by primrose.dataflame.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256)
 (Exim 4.87) (envelope-from <email address hidden>)
 id 1bPGyg-002oKs-Lc
 for <email address hidden>; Mon, 18 Jul 2016 23:25:32 +0100
User-Agent: K-9 Mail for Android
In-Reply-To: <email address hidden>
References: <email address hidden>
 <email address hidden>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2016 23:25:31 +0100
To: <email address hidden>
Message-ID: <email address hidden>
X-OutGoing-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.16
Subject: Re: [Midimag-ex] 1 last experiment
X-BeenThere: <email address hidden>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.16
Precedence: list
From: Phil Muir via Midimag-ex <email address hidden>
Reply-To: <email address hidden>,
	<email address hidden>,
	Phil Muir <email address hidden>
List-Id: <midimag-ex.mailman.midimag-xt.org>
List-Unsubscribe:
<http://mailman.midimag-xt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/midimag-ex>,
 <mailto:<email address hidden>?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mailman.midimag-xt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/midimag-ex/>
List-Post: <mailto:<email address hidden>>
List-Help: <mailto:<email address hidden>?subject=help>
List-Subscribe:
<http://mailman.midimag-xt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/midimag-ex>,
 <mailto:<email address hidden>?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Errors-To: <email address hidden>
Sender: "Midimag-ex" <email address hidden>
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On 7/18/16, Mark Sapiro <email address hidden> wrote:
> I note you are telling me two different things in Comments #2 and #3.
>
> Comment #2 says
> In addition to the list address & his address, the address that appears in
> the email header as well is:
> Accessibility at mailman dot midimag dash xt dot org
> which is a thoroughly bogus address.
>
> which says there are 3 addresses in (I assume) Reply-To: of the post
> from Mailman.
>
> Comment #3 says
> the reply-to: header contains the list address &, instead of his email
> address, there's an address Accessibility at mailman dot midimag dash xt dot
> org instead of his actual email address.
>
> which says there are only 2 addresses in Reply-To: of the post from
> Mailman.
>
> I'd like to see the raw headers of the mail from the list. If you don't
> want to post them here, you can mail them to <email address hidden>.
>
> Here's an example of full headers of a mail to a list:
>
> >From <email address hidden> Mon Jul 18 22:57:00 2016
> Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2016 22:57:00 -0700
> From: Mark Sapiro <email address hidden>
> To: <email address hidden>
> Subject: Test mail
> Message-ID: <email address hidden>
> Reply-To: <email address hidden>
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> Content-Disposition: inline
> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30)
> Status: RO
> Content-Length: 147
> Lines: 4
>
>
> And the headers of the mail from the list
>
> >From <email address hidden>  Mon Jul 18 22:57:14 2016
> Return-Path: <email address hidden>
> X-Original-To: <email address hidden>
> Delivered-To: <email address hidden>
> Received: from [127.0.1.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
>         by msapiro.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6AC234028D
>         for <email address hidden>; Mon, 18 Jul 2016 22:57:10 -0700 (PDT)
> X-Original-To: <email address hidden>
> Delivered-To: <email address hidden>
> Received: by msapiro.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
>         id DEC133402D7; Mon, 18 Jul 2016 22:57:00 -0700 (PDT)
> Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2016 22:57:00 -0700
> To: <email address hidden>
> Message-ID: <email address hidden>
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Content-Disposition: inline
> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30)
> X-msapiro-MailScanner: Found to be clean
> X-msapiro-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (not cached,
> score=0,
>         required 6, autolearn=not spam,
>         NO_RELAYS -0.00, URIBL_BLOCKED 0.00)
> X-Spam-Status: No
> Subject: [List1] Test mail
> X-BeenThere: <email address hidden>
> X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
> Precedence: list
> List-Id: My List one <list1.msapiro.net>
> List-Unsubscribe: <http://msapiro.net/mailman/options/list1>,
>         <mailto:<email address hidden>?subject=unsubscribe>
> List-Archive: <http://msapiro.net/pipermail/list1/>
> List-Post: <mailto:<email address hidden>>
> List-Help: <mailto:<email address hidden>?subject=help>
> List-Subscribe: <http://msapiro.net/mailman/listinfo/list1>,
>         <mailto:<email address hidden>?subject=subscribe>
> From: Mark Sapiro via List1 <email address hidden>
> Reply-To: <email address hidden>, My List one <email address hidden>
> Cc: Mark Sapiro <email address hidden>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> Errors-To: <email address hidden>
> Sender: List1 <email address hidden>
> X-msapiro-MailScanner-ID: E6AC234028D.AFCF3
> X-msapiro-MailScanner: Found to be clean
> X-msapiro-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (not cached,
>         score=-0.999, required 6, autolearn=not spam, ALL_TRUSTED -1.00,
>         URIBL_BLOCKED 0.00)
> X-msapiro-MailScanner-From: <email address hidden>
> X-Spam-Status: No
> Status: O
> Content-Length: 275
> Lines: 9
>
> This is Mailman 2.1.22+, but I think the only difference from 2.1.16 is
> the original From: would be added to Reply-To: instead of Cc: except the
> address is already there because of the original Reply-To: and
> first_strip_reply_to = No so it wouldn't be added a second time.
>
> --
> You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to the bug
> report.
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1604181
>
> Title:
>   mangled reply-to: header when a reply-to: header exists
>
> Status in GNU Mailman:
>   Incomplete
>
> Bug description:
>   I'm trying to set my list up such that folks reply to the list, but can
> also view a poster's email in order to reply personally if they desire. I've
> set 'Reply-to:' to list, & I didn't strip the first 'reply-to:' header. When
> someone has a reply-to: address set, I get 3 addresses--the list address,
> the poster's address, & a mangled address that consists of the poster's
> address prior to the @ sign & the fqdn of the list following it. So if my
> list address is <email address hidden>, & my poster w/the reply-to:
> setting's email is <email address hidden>, I'd get addresses as:
>   <email address hidden>
>   <email address hidden> (which there is no such address) &
>   <email address hidden>.
>
>   I'm running Mailman 2.1.16. Has this perchance been fixed in
>   subsequent versions?
>
> To manage notifications about this bug go to:
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/mailman/+bug/1604181/+subscriptions
>


-- 
Jackie McBride
Website Hosting, Repair, & Development
Author of the Upcoming Book
"My Site's Been Hacked, Now what?: A Guide to Preventing and Fixing a
Compromised Website"
www.brighter-vision.com Where Visionaries & Technology Unite for Good