Some strange behavior of maddm near s-channel resonant pole

Bug #1928212 reported by WenbinZhao
6
This bug affects 1 person
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
MadDM
New
Undecided
J. Heisig

Bug Description

Basically I was investigating a dirac dark matter model whose relic density is governed by a s-channel process and the mediator is a gauge boson whose mass is around 3 times dark matter mass. So the process is dominated by pole behavior.
And if I define r=m_dm/m_boson, I would like to see as r grows, the relic density should drop as we are closer to the pole.
In general it works in maddm, but there are some fluctuations in the curve. I tried to identify what's going wrong here and found that the <sigmav> calculation might be the reason. I tried to change the following parameters ngrid_init and nres_points to 500 and 1000. But I didn't see any improvement. (Also iter_wij)
Since in this case the low velocity is favored by Maxwell Distribution and large velocity is favored by cross-section, there might be something hard to handle by the code.
Is there any way to improve the results? Or I simply missed some other important parameters which might also play a role here?

Revision history for this message
WenbinZhao (s6wnzhao) wrote :
Revision history for this message
WenbinZhao (s6wnzhao) wrote :
Changed in maddm:
assignee: nobody → J. Heisig (heisig)
Revision history for this message
J. Heisig (heisig) wrote :

Hi WenbinZhao,

Thanks for the bug report. Could you attach (or send me) your model and param_card you used (plus a short explanation on what mass you fixed when varying r), so I can try to reproduce your results?

Best,
Jan

Revision history for this message
WenbinZhao (s6wnzhao) wrote : Re: [Bug 1928212] Re: Some strange behavior of maddm near s-channel resonant pole
  • launch.txt Edit (194 bytes, text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; name="launch.txt")
  • model.tar Edit (240.0 KiB, application/x-tar; name="model.tar")
  • scan_run_01.txt Edit (10.7 KiB, text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; name="scan_run_01.txt")

Dear Jan,

Please find the model in the attachment. This is a simple L_\mu - L_\tau
model.
I only have 4 BSM parameters here{*qpsi,mx,ra,gX*} : one is dm charge *qpsi*,
which is not relevant with our problem. Another is *mx*, which is the mass
of the mediator gauge boson. Then the *ra*, defines the ratio between dark
matter mass and gauge boson mass. And *gX* defines the gauge coupling. They
are in *L23input* section.
when varying r (ra) I fixed all the other parameters. I think their value
is the same as in launch.txt.
I also put the output file in the attachment.
The plot <sigmav> vs r is somehow gotten by hand. I used the function
*taacs_check
*for each point and picked a certain value.
Hope everything will work out well.

Bests,
Wenbin

On Wed, May 12, 2021 at 2:25 PM J. Heisig <email address hidden>
wrote:

> Hi WenbinZhao,
>
> Thanks for the bug report. Could you attach (or send me) your model and
> param_card you used (plus a short explanation on what mass you fixed
> when varying r), so I can try to reproduce your results?
>
> Best,
> Jan
>
> --
> You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to the bug
> report.
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1928212
>
> Title:
> Some strange behavior of maddm near s-channel resonant pole
>
> Status in MadDM:
> New
>
> Bug description:
> Basically I was investigating a dirac dark matter model whose relic
> density is governed by a s-channel process and the mediator is a gauge
> boson whose mass is around 3 times dark matter mass. So the process is
> dominated by pole behavior.
> And if I define r=m_dm/m_boson, I would like to see as r grows, the
> relic density should drop as we are closer to the pole.
> In general it works in maddm, but there are some fluctuations in the
> curve. I tried to identify what's going wrong here and found that the
> <sigmav> calculation might be the reason. I tried to change the following
> parameters ngrid_init and nres_points to 500 and 1000. But I didn't see any
> improvement. (Also iter_wij)
> Since in this case the low velocity is favored by Maxwell Distribution
> and large velocity is favored by cross-section, there might be something
> hard to handle by the code.
> Is there any way to improve the results? Or I simply missed some other
> important parameters which might also play a role here?
>
> To manage notifications about this bug go to:
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/maddm/+bug/1928212/+subscriptions
>

To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.