ZeroResult error

[Ridhauddinsabri]

I know I can read from https://cp3.irmp.ucl.ac.be/projects/madgraph/wiki/FAQ-General-14 but before this the code can run it, but after sometimes the codes its not worked. May I know why?

[Olivier Mattelaer (olivier-mattelaer)]

before what?

Cheers,

Olivier

[Ridhauddinsabri (ridhauddin94)]

I mean, I can get the result before that, when I re-launch, I got that
error.

On Tue, Sep 8, 2020 at 5:15 PM Olivier Mattelaer <email address hidden>
wrote:

> before what?
>
> Cheers,
>
> Olivier
>
> --
> You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to the bug
> report.
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1894807
>
> Title:
> ZeroResult error
>
> Status in MadDM:
> New
>
> Bug description:
> I know I can read from
> https://cp3.irmp.ucl.ac.be/projects/madgraph/wiki/FAQ-General-14 but
> before this the code can run it, but after sometimes the codes its not
> worked. May I know why?
>
> To manage notifications about this bug go to:
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/maddm/+bug/1894807/+subscriptions
>

[Olivier Mattelaer (olivier-mattelaer)]

By result do you speak about relic density?
direct detection?, indirect detection.

I expect this error to appear only for indirect detection (in precise mode) so the two other computation should be fine.

Cheers,

Olivier

> On 8 Sep 2020, at 11:23, Ridhauddinsabri <email address hidden> wrote:
>
> I mean, I can get the result before that, when I re-launch, I got that
> error.
>
> On Tue, Sep 8, 2020 at 5:15 PM Olivier Mattelaer <email address hidden>
> wrote:
>
>> before what?
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Olivier
>>
>> --
>> You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to the bug
>> report.
>> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1894807
>>
>> Title:
>> ZeroResult error
>>
>> Status in MadDM:
>> New
>>
>> Bug description:
>> I know I can read from
>> https://cp3.irmp.ucl.ac.be/projects/madgraph/wiki/FAQ-General-14 but
>> before this the code can run it, but after sometimes the codes its not
>> worked. May I know why?
>>
>> To manage notifications about this bug go to:
>> https://bugs.launchpad.net/maddm/+bug/1894807/+subscriptions
>>
>
> --
> You received this bug notification because you are a member of maddm,
> which is subscribed to MadDM.
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1894807
>
> Title:
> ZeroResult error
>
> Status in MadDM:
> New
>
> Bug description:
> I know I can read from
> https://cp3.irmp.ucl.ac.be/projects/madgraph/wiki/FAQ-General-14 but
> before this the code can run it, but after sometimes the codes its not
> worked. May I know why?
>
> To manage notifications about this bug go to:
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/maddm/+bug/1894807/+subscriptions

[Ridhauddinsabri (ridhauddin94)]

Yes, relic density is fine but for the indirect detection no, I don't do
the direct detection.

Is this error because of pythia8?

On Tue, Sep 8, 2020 at 5:40 PM Olivier Mattelaer <email address hidden>
wrote:

> By result do you speak about relic density?
> direct detection?, indirect detection.
>
> I expect this error to appear only for indirect detection (in precise
> mode) so the two other computation should be fine.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Olivier
>
>
> > On 8 Sep 2020, at 11:23, Ridhauddinsabri <email address hidden>
> wrote:
> >
> > I mean, I can get the result before that, when I re-launch, I got that
> > error.
> >
> > On Tue, Sep 8, 2020 at 5:15 PM Olivier Mattelaer <
> <email address hidden>>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> before what?
> >>
> >> Cheers,
> >>
> >> Olivier
> >>
> >> --
> >> You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to the bug
> >> report.
> >> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1894807
> >>
> >> Title:
> >> ZeroResult error
> >>
> >> Status in MadDM:
> >> New
> >>
> >> Bug description:
> >> I know I can read from
> >> https://cp3.irmp.ucl.ac.be/projects/madgraph/wiki/FAQ-General-14 but
> >> before this the code can run it, but after sometimes the codes its not
> >> worked. May I know why?
> >>
> >> To manage notifications about this bug go to:
> >> https://bugs.launchpad.net/maddm/+bug/1894807/+subscriptions
> >>
> >
> > --
> > You received this bug notification because you are a member of maddm,
> > which is subscribed to MadDM.
> > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1894807
> >
> > Title:
> > ZeroResult error
> >
> > Status in MadDM:
> > New
> >
> > Bug description:
> > I know I can read from
> > https://cp3.irmp.ucl.ac.be/projects/madgraph/wiki/FAQ-General-14 but
> > before this the code can run it, but after sometimes the codes its not
> > worked. May I know why?
> >
> > To manage notifications about this bug go to:
> > https://bugs.launchpad.net/maddm/+bug/1894807/+subscriptions
>
> --
> You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to the bug
> report.
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1894807
>
> Title:
> ZeroResult error
>
> Status in MadDM:
> New
>
> Bug description:
> I know I can read from
> https://cp3.irmp.ucl.ac.be/projects/madgraph/wiki/FAQ-General-14 but
> before this the code can run it, but after sometimes the codes its not
> worked. May I know why?
>
> To manage notifications about this bug go to:
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/maddm/+bug/1894807/+subscriptions
>

[Olivier Mattelaer (olivier-mattelaer)]

Let maybe restart from scratch rather than me trying to guess what you mean.

Could you
1) explain what you want to achieve
2) explain how you try to achieve it (command that you uuse)
3) what is going wrong with the above command
4) attach the debug file generated.

The typical way to help someone is first to understand what he is doing, reproduce the error on my laptop and only then I can comment. Please help me to help you.

Olivier

> On 8 Sep 2020, at 11:53, Ridhauddinsabri <email address hidden> wrote:
>
> Yes, relic density is fine but for the indirect detection no, I don't do
> the direct detection.
>
> Is this error because of pythia8?
>
> On Tue, Sep 8, 2020 at 5:40 PM Olivier Mattelaer <email address hidden>
> wrote:
>
>> By result do you speak about relic density?
>> direct detection?, indirect detection.
>>
>> I expect this error to appear only for indirect detection (in precise
>> mode) so the two other computation should be fine.
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Olivier
>>
>>
>>> On 8 Sep 2020, at 11:23, Ridhauddinsabri <email address hidden>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> I mean, I can get the result before that, when I re-launch, I got that
>>> error.
>>>
>>> On Tue, Sep 8, 2020 at 5:15 PM Olivier Mattelaer <
>> <email address hidden>>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> before what?
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>>
>>>> Olivier
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to the bug
>>>> report.
>>>> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1894807
>>>>
>>>> Title:
>>>> ZeroResult error
>>>>
>>>> Status in MadDM:
>>>> New
>>>>
>>>> Bug description:
>>>> I know I can read from
>>>> https://cp3.irmp.ucl.ac.be/projects/madgraph/wiki/FAQ-General-14 but
>>>> before this the code can run it, but after sometimes the codes its not
>>>> worked. May I know why?
>>>>
>>>> To manage notifications about this bug go to:
>>>> https://bugs.launchpad.net/maddm/+bug/1894807/+subscriptions
>>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> You received this bug notification because you are a member of maddm,
>>> which is subscribed to MadDM.
>>> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1894807
>>>
>>> Title:
>>> ZeroResult error
>>>
>>> Status in MadDM:
>>> New
>>>
>>> Bug description:
>>> I know I can read from
>>> https://cp3.irmp.ucl.ac.be/projects/madgraph/wiki/FAQ-General-14 but
>>> before this the code can run it, but after sometimes the codes its not
>>> worked. May I know why?
>>>
>>> To manage notifications about this bug go to:
>>> https://bugs.launchpad.net/maddm/+bug/1894807/+subscriptions
>>
>> --
>> You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to the bug
>> report.
>> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1894807
>>
>> Title:
>> ZeroResult error
>>
>> Status in MadDM:
>> New
>>
>> Bug description:
>> I know I can read from
>> https://cp3.irmp.ucl.ac.be/projects/madgraph/wiki/FAQ-General-14 but
>> before this the code can run it, but after sometimes the codes its not
>> worked. May I know why?
>>
>> To manage notifications about this bug go to:
>> https://bugs.launchpad.net/maddm/+bug/1894807/+subscriptions
>>
>
> --
> You received this bug notification because you are a member of maddm,
> which is subscribed to MadDM.
> ...

[Ridhauddinsabri (ridhauddin94)]

Explain what you want to achieve
1. I want to get the annihilation spectrum for e- e+ from Kaluza-Klein
particle decay. (Indirect detection)
2. I also want to get the annihilation cross-section (sigmaV) in the
astrophysical environment. (cluster environment)

Explain how you try to achieve it (Command that you use)
1. I import model MUED_UFO from feynrules database (Minimal UED under
universal extra dimension)
2. Then I define darkmatter a1, one of the KK particle in the model.
3. I generate relic_density / bsm, because I don't want the bsm particle as
final product.
4. Then I add indirect_detection e- e+, to specify the final product for my
indirect detection
5. Then output MyparticleName.
6. Before I launch, I edit the maddm.card, Halo average velocity to 1e-02
for cluster environment, and I set save_output to all
7. Then, I edit param.card, MH to 125, and MUEDinputs to 1/200
8. Then I launch MyparticleName.

What is going wrong with the above command
1. For the first time, all the above is working well, but after that when I
change MUEDinputs to 1/300 and even I set to default 1/500 I got the Zero
result error that I share at first.

Attach the debug file generated
#************************************************************
#* MadGraph5_aMC@NLO *
#* *
#* * * *
#* * * * * *
#* * * * * 5 * * * * *
#* * * * * *
#* * * *
#* *
#* *
#* VERSION 2.7.3 2020-06-21 *
#* *
#* The MadGraph5_aMC@NLO Development Team - Find us at *
#* https://server06.fynu.ucl.ac.be/projects/madgraph *
#* *
#************************************************************
#* *
#* Command File for MadGraph5_aMC@NLO *
#* *
#* run as ./bin/mg5_aMC filename *
#* *
#************************************************************
set default_unset_couplings 99
set group_subprocesses Auto
set ignore_six_quark_processes False
set loop_optimized_output True
set loop_color_flows False
set gauge unitary
set complex_mass_scheme False
set max_npoint_for_channel 0
import model sm
define p = g u c d s u~ c~ d~ s~
define j = g u c d s u~ c~ d~ s~
define l+ = e+ mu+
define l- = e- mu-
define vl = ve vm vt
define vl~ = ve~ vm~ vt~
import model MUED_UFO
define darkmatter a1
import model
/home/ridha/Downloads/MG5_aMC_v2.7.1.2/MG5_aMC_v2_7_1_2/models/MUED_UFO__REAL
generate relic_density /bsm
add indirect_detection e- e+
output KKphoton1
launch
launch
launch
launch
launch photonDM1...

[Olivier Mattelaer (olivier-mattelaer)]

Yes, now I can take a look at the issue (likely next week).

Are you sure that this is not a benchmark issue? (like that if you change that parameter the cross-section is indeed zero?) [Sorry I have no idea of what your parameter is doing in the model]

Cheers,

Olivier

> On 8 Sep 2020, at 12:49, Ridhauddinsabri <email address hidden> wrote:
>
> Explain what you want to achieve
> 1. I want to get the annihilation spectrum for e- e+ from Kaluza-Klein
> particle decay. (Indirect detection)
> 2. I also want to get the annihilation cross-section (sigmaV) in the
> astrophysical environment. (cluster environment)
>
> Explain how you try to achieve it (Command that you use)
> 1. I import model MUED_UFO from feynrules database (Minimal UED under
> universal extra dimension)
> 2. Then I define darkmatter a1, one of the KK particle in the model.
> 3. I generate relic_density / bsm, because I don't want the bsm particle as
> final product.
> 4. Then I add indirect_detection e- e+, to specify the final product for my
> indirect detection
> 5. Then output MyparticleName.
> 6. Before I launch, I edit the maddm.card, Halo average velocity to 1e-02
> for cluster environment, and I set save_output to all
> 7. Then, I edit param.card, MH to 125, and MUEDinputs to 1/200
> 8. Then I launch MyparticleName.
>
> What is going wrong with the above command
> 1. For the first time, all the above is working well, but after that when I
> change MUEDinputs to 1/300 and even I set to default 1/500 I got the Zero
> result error that I share at first.
>
> Attach the debug file generated
> #************************************************************
> #* MadGraph5_aMC@NLO *
> #* *
> #* * * *
> #* * * * * *
> #* * * * * 5 * * * * *
> #* * * * * *
> #* * * *
> #* *
> #* *
> #* VERSION 2.7.3 2020-06-21 *
> #* *
> #* The MadGraph5_aMC@NLO Development Team - Find us at *
> #* https://server06.fynu.ucl.ac.be/projects/madgraph *
> #* *
> #************************************************************
> #* *
> #* Command File for MadGraph5_aMC@NLO *
> #* *
> #* run as ./bin/mg5_aMC filename *
> #* *
> #************************************************************
> set default_unset_couplings 99
> set group_subprocesses Auto
> set ignore_six_quark_processes False
> set loop_optimized_output True
> set loop_color_flows False
> set gauge unitary
> set complex_m...

[Ridhauddinsabri (ridhauddin94)]

The cross-section for the particle that I use is zero, but it based on the
model.

On Fri, Sep 11, 2020 at 6:40 AM Olivier Mattelaer <
<email address hidden>> wrote:

> Yes, now I can take a look at the issue (likely next week).
>
> Are you sure that this is not a benchmark issue? (like that if you
> change that parameter the cross-section is indeed zero?) [Sorry I have
> no idea of what your parameter is doing in the model]
>
> Cheers,
>
> Olivier
>
> > On 8 Sep 2020, at 12:49, Ridhauddinsabri <email address hidden>
> wrote:
> >
> > Explain what you want to achieve
> > 1. I want to get the annihilation spectrum for e- e+ from Kaluza-Klein
> > particle decay. (Indirect detection)
> > 2. I also want to get the annihilation cross-section (sigmaV) in the
> > astrophysical environment. (cluster environment)
> >
> > Explain how you try to achieve it (Command that you use)
> > 1. I import model MUED_UFO from feynrules database (Minimal UED under
> > universal extra dimension)
> > 2. Then I define darkmatter a1, one of the KK particle in the model.
> > 3. I generate relic_density / bsm, because I don't want the bsm particle
> as
> > final product.
> > 4. Then I add indirect_detection e- e+, to specify the final product for
> my
> > indirect detection
> > 5. Then output MyparticleName.
> > 6. Before I launch, I edit the maddm.card, Halo average velocity to 1e-02
> > for cluster environment, and I set save_output to all
> > 7. Then, I edit param.card, MH to 125, and MUEDinputs to 1/200
> > 8. Then I launch MyparticleName.
> >
> > What is going wrong with the above command
> > 1. For the first time, all the above is working well, but after that
> when I
> > change MUEDinputs to 1/300 and even I set to default 1/500 I got the Zero
> > result error that I share at first.
> >
> > Attach the debug file generated
> > #************************************************************
> > #* MadGraph5_aMC@NLO *
> > #* *
> > #* * * *
> > #* * * * * *
> > #* * * * * 5 * * * * *
> > #* * * * * *
> > #* * * *
> > #* *
> > #* *
> > #* VERSION 2.7.3 2020-06-21 *
> > #* *
> > #* The MadGraph5_aMC@NLO Development Team - Find us at *
> > #* https://server06.fynu.ucl.ac.be/projects/madgraph *
> > #* *
> > #************************************************************
> > #* *
> > #* Command File for MadGraph5_aMC@NLO *
> > #* *
> > #* run as ./bin/mg5_aMC filename *
> > #* ...

[Olivier Mattelaer (olivier-mattelaer)]

So do i understand correctly that you do not expect any help from me anymore?

Cheers,

Olivier

> On 11 Sep 2020, at 03:53, Ridhauddinsabri <email address hidden> wrote:
>
> The cross-section for the particle that I use is zero, but it based on the
> model.
>
>
> On Fri, Sep 11, 2020 at 6:40 AM Olivier Mattelaer <
> <email address hidden>> wrote:
>
>> Yes, now I can take a look at the issue (likely next week).
>>
>> Are you sure that this is not a benchmark issue? (like that if you
>> change that parameter the cross-section is indeed zero?) [Sorry I have
>> no idea of what your parameter is doing in the model]
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Olivier
>>
>>> On 8 Sep 2020, at 12:49, Ridhauddinsabri <email address hidden>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Explain what you want to achieve
>>> 1. I want to get the annihilation spectrum for e- e+ from Kaluza-Klein
>>> particle decay. (Indirect detection)
>>> 2. I also want to get the annihilation cross-section (sigmaV) in the
>>> astrophysical environment. (cluster environment)
>>>
>>> Explain how you try to achieve it (Command that you use)
>>> 1. I import model MUED_UFO from feynrules database (Minimal UED under
>>> universal extra dimension)
>>> 2. Then I define darkmatter a1, one of the KK particle in the model.
>>> 3. I generate relic_density / bsm, because I don't want the bsm particle
>> as
>>> final product.
>>> 4. Then I add indirect_detection e- e+, to specify the final product for
>> my
>>> indirect detection
>>> 5. Then output MyparticleName.
>>> 6. Before I launch, I edit the maddm.card, Halo average velocity to 1e-02
>>> for cluster environment, and I set save_output to all
>>> 7. Then, I edit param.card, MH to 125, and MUEDinputs to 1/200
>>> 8. Then I launch MyparticleName.
>>>
>>> What is going wrong with the above command
>>> 1. For the first time, all the above is working well, but after that
>> when I
>>> change MUEDinputs to 1/300 and even I set to default 1/500 I got the Zero
>>> result error that I share at first.
>>>
>>> Attach the debug file generated
>>> #************************************************************
>>> #* MadGraph5_aMC@NLO *
>>> #* *
>>> #* * * *
>>> #* * * * * *
>>> #* * * * * 5 * * * * *
>>> #* * * * * *
>>> #* * * *
>>> #* *
>>> #* *
>>> #* VERSION 2.7.3 2020-06-21 *
>>> #* *
>>> #* The MadGraph5_aMC@NLO Development Team - Find us at *
>>> #* https://server06.fynu.ucl.ac.be/projects/madgraph *
>>> #* *
>>> #************************************************************
>>> #* *
>>> #* ...

[Ridhauddinsabri (ridhauddin94)]

No, I still need your help, because as I try to run this morning, the zero
Error is still there, after two runs and the error is not consistent.
Today, I tried to use the default settings of the model, I cannot get the
output, but yesterday I can get the output.

On Fri, Sep 11, 2020 at 2:55 PM Olivier Mattelaer <
<email address hidden>> wrote:

> So do i understand correctly that you do not expect any help from me
> anymore?
>
> Cheers,
>
> Olivier
>
> > On 11 Sep 2020, at 03:53, Ridhauddinsabri <email address hidden>
> wrote:
> >
> > The cross-section for the particle that I use is zero, but it based on
> the
> > model.
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Sep 11, 2020 at 6:40 AM Olivier Mattelaer <
> > <email address hidden>> wrote:
> >
> >> Yes, now I can take a look at the issue (likely next week).
> >>
> >> Are you sure that this is not a benchmark issue? (like that if you
> >> change that parameter the cross-section is indeed zero?) [Sorry I have
> >> no idea of what your parameter is doing in the model]
> >>
> >> Cheers,
> >>
> >> Olivier
> >>
> >>> On 8 Sep 2020, at 12:49, Ridhauddinsabri <email address hidden>
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Explain what you want to achieve
> >>> 1. I want to get the annihilation spectrum for e- e+ from Kaluza-Klein
> >>> particle decay. (Indirect detection)
> >>> 2. I also want to get the annihilation cross-section (sigmaV) in the
> >>> astrophysical environment. (cluster environment)
> >>>
> >>> Explain how you try to achieve it (Command that you use)
> >>> 1. I import model MUED_UFO from feynrules database (Minimal UED under
> >>> universal extra dimension)
> >>> 2. Then I define darkmatter a1, one of the KK particle in the model.
> >>> 3. I generate relic_density / bsm, because I don't want the bsm
> particle
> >> as
> >>> final product.
> >>> 4. Then I add indirect_detection e- e+, to specify the final product
> for
> >> my
> >>> indirect detection
> >>> 5. Then output MyparticleName.
> >>> 6. Before I launch, I edit the maddm.card, Halo average velocity to
> 1e-02
> >>> for cluster environment, and I set save_output to all
> >>> 7. Then, I edit param.card, MH to 125, and MUEDinputs to 1/200
> >>> 8. Then I launch MyparticleName.
> >>>
> >>> What is going wrong with the above command
> >>> 1. For the first time, all the above is working well, but after that
> >> when I
> >>> change MUEDinputs to 1/300 and even I set to default 1/500 I got the
> Zero
> >>> result error that I share at first.
> >>>
> >>> Attach the debug file generated
> >>> #************************************************************
> >>> #* MadGraph5_aMC@NLO *
> >>> #* *
> >>> #* * * *
> >>> #* * * * * *
> >>> #* * * * * 5 * * * * *
> >>> #* * * * * *
> >>> #* * * *
> >>> #* *
> >>> #* ...

[Olivier Mattelaer (olivier-mattelaer)]

Hi,

I have run many times (around 100 times) for the following scan on the r parameter:
###################################
## INFORMATION FOR MUEDINPUTS
###################################
BLOCK MUEDINPUTS #
      1 scan:[1./x for x in [200,300,500,200,300,500]] # r
      2 2.000000e+01 # lr

I face one numerical issue on the lhe file which was creating issue on the following run leading to the same zero result that you mention. Now on more that 300 hundreds run I face that one.
However I do not have kept infor information to face it back and all the subsequent run done to reproduce it finish normally.
Additionally, I suspect that this might be related to a bug that was fix in version 2.8.0 of the code.
(and which is indeed seed dependant and would create that exact issue)
But since I fail to reproduce it, my only advice would be to move to the latest version of the code.

Cheers,

Olivier

> On 11 Sep 2020, at 09:10, Ridhauddinsabri <email address hidden> wrote:
>
> No, I still need your help, because as I try to run this morning, the zero
> Error is still there, after two runs and the error is not consistent.
> Today, I tried to use the default settings of the model, I cannot get the
> output, but yesterday I can get the output.
>
> On Fri, Sep 11, 2020 at 2:55 PM Olivier Mattelaer <
> <email address hidden>> wrote:
>
>> So do i understand correctly that you do not expect any help from me
>> anymore?
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Olivier
>>
>>> On 11 Sep 2020, at 03:53, Ridhauddinsabri <email address hidden>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> The cross-section for the particle that I use is zero, but it based on
>> the
>>> model.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Sep 11, 2020 at 6:40 AM Olivier Mattelaer <
>>> <email address hidden>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Yes, now I can take a look at the issue (likely next week).
>>>>
>>>> Are you sure that this is not a benchmark issue? (like that if you
>>>> change that parameter the cross-section is indeed zero?) [Sorry I have
>>>> no idea of what your parameter is doing in the model]
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>>
>>>> Olivier
>>>>
>>>>> On 8 Sep 2020, at 12:49, Ridhauddinsabri <email address hidden>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Explain what you want to achieve
>>>>> 1. I want to get the annihilation spectrum for e- e+ from Kaluza-Klein
>>>>> particle decay. (Indirect detection)
>>>>> 2. I also want to get the annihilation cross-section (sigmaV) in the
>>>>> astrophysical environment. (cluster environment)
>>>>>
>>>>> Explain how you try to achieve it (Command that you use)
>>>>> 1. I import model MUED_UFO from feynrules database (Minimal UED under
>>>>> universal extra dimension)
>>>>> 2. Then I define darkmatter a1, one of the KK particle in the model.
>>>>> 3. I generate relic_density / bsm, because I don't want the bsm
>> particle
>>>> as
>>>>> final product.
>>>>> 4. Then I add indirect_detection e- e+, to specify the final product
>> for
>>>> my
>>>>> indirect detection
>>>>> 5. Then output MyparticleName.
>>>>> 6. Before I launch, I edit the maddm.card, Halo average velocity to
>> 1e-02
>>>>> for cluster environment, and I set save_output to all
>>>>> 7. Then, I edit param.card, MH to 125, and MUEDinputs to 1...

[Ridhauddinsabri (ridhauddin94)]

I cannot update to new version.

Command "install update " interrupted in sub-command:
"install update" with error:
OSError : [Errno 2] No such file or directory: '/home/ridha/Downloads/MG5_aMC_v2.7.1.2/MG5_aMC_v2_7_1_2/Template/SubProcesses/addmothers.f'

I got that error.