Allow user to provide separate storage location for images through GUI
Bug #1887384 reported by
Nick Niehoff
This bug affects 2 people
Affects | Status | Importance | Assigned to | Milestone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
MAAS |
Invalid
|
Medium
|
Unassigned |
Bug Description
On deployments with a large number of images, it may become desirable to be able to provide a separate storage location for images downloaded to the rack controller. This would allow the user to have a separate mount with dedicated storage. The ask would be for this to be configurable in the GUI and be officially supported through the upgrade process.
The unofficial workaround to accomplish this is to simply mount a separate device at either:
/var/snap/
or
/var/lib/
summary: |
- [feature] Allow user to provide separate storage location for images - through GUI + Allow user to provide separate storage location for images through GUI |
To post a comment you must log in.
We've had variants of this request for awhile. MAAS currently stores all images in Postgres and on the filesystem of each controller. On a region+rack images take up double the space and many users don't like having large files stored in Postgres. Since MAAS boots over HTTP we've also had a number of requests to allow MAAS to manage all images using a remote file server(S3 endpoint) and no store the images at all.
We need to get time scheduled on the roadmap for this and hash out all the details.