MAAS

  1. Bug #1519527
  2. Comment #34

Comment 34 for bug 1519527

Revision history for this message
Andreas Hasenack (ahasenack) wrote :

> I agree that we cannot move juju 1.25.1 out of proposed until the issue is resolved.
> Discussions between dimitern and mpontillo indicate that this is a maas 1.9beta2+
> regression which changes in juju 1.25.1 exposed.

It also exposed a bug in juju-core (it ignores the fact that the claim-sticky-ip-address call actually failed): https://bugs.launchpad.net/juju-core/+bug/1520199