MAAS

Bug #1069734
Comment #2

Comment 2 for bug 1069734

Revision history for this message

Launchpad Janitor (janitor) wrote on 2013-06-06:

This bug was fixed in the package maas - 1.2+bzr1373+dfsg-0ubuntu1

---------------
maas (1.2+bzr1373+dfsg-0ubuntu1) quantal-proposed; urgency=low

  * MAAS Stable Release Update (LP: #1109283):
    This SRU brings a new upstream release of MAAS that removes
    the usage of a cobbler code copy, 'maas-provision' as well as
    several bug fixes. Exception has been granted by the Technical
    Board to proceed. More information can be found in:
    https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel-announce/2013-February/001012.html

  [ Andres Rodriguez ]
  * debian/control:
    - Change Conflicts/Replaces for Breaks/Replaces.
    - Conflicts on tftpd-hpa and dnsmasq.
    - Do not pre-depends, but Depends on ${misc:Depends} for 'maas'.

  [ Steve Langasek ]
  * postinst scripts are never called with 'reconfigure' as the script
    argument. Remove references to this (mythical) invocation.
  * always call 'set -e' from maintainer scripts instead of passing 'sh -e'
    as the interpreter, so that scripts will behave correctly when run via
    'sh -x'.
  * invoke-rc.d is never allowed to not exist - simplify scripts (and make
    them better policy-compliant) by invoking unconditionally. (The only
    possible exception is in the postrm, where it's *theoretically* possible
    for invoke-rc.d to be missing if the user has completely stripped
    down their system; that's a fairly unreasonable corner case, but we
    might as well be correct if it ever happens.)
  * db_get+db_set is a no-op; don't call db_set to push back a value we just
    got from db_get.
  * Omit superfluous calls to 'exit 0' at the end of each script.
  * Remove maas-cluster-controller prerm script, which called debconf for no
    reason.
  * Don't invoke debconf in the postrm script either, debhelper already does
    this for us.
  * Other miscellaneous maintainer script fixes
  * debian/maas-common.postinst: call adduser and addgroup unconditionally;
    the tools are already designed to DTRT, we don't need to check for the
    user/group existence before calling them nor should we worry about
    calling them only once on first install.
  * debian/maas-common.postrm: delete the maas group, not just the user,
    as the comment in the code implies we should do.
-- Andres Rodriguez <email address hidden> Thu, 07 Mar 2013 14:22:35 -0500

This bug was fixed in the package maas - 1.2+bzr1373+dfsg-0ubuntu1

---------------
maas (1.2+bzr1373+dfsg-0ubuntu1) quantal-proposed; urgency=low

[ Steve Langasek ]
  * postinst scripts are never called with 'reconfigure' as the script
    argument.  Remove references to this (mythical) invocation.
  * always call 'set -e' from maintainer scripts instead of passing 'sh -e'
    as the interpreter, so that scripts will behave correctly when run via
    'sh -x'.
  * invoke-rc.d is never allowed to not exist - simplify scripts (and make
    them better policy-compliant) by invoking unconditionally.  (The only
    possible exception is in the postrm, where it's *theoretically* possible
    for invoke-rc.d to be missing if the user has completely stripped
    down their system; that's a fairly unreasonable corner case, but we
    might as well be correct if it ever happens.)
  * db_get+db_set is a no-op; don't call db_set to push back a value we just
    got from db_get.
  * Omit superfluous calls to 'exit 0' at the end of each script.
  * Remove maas-cluster-controller prerm script, which called debconf for no
    reason.
  * Don't invoke debconf in the postrm script either, debhelper already does
    this for us.
  * Other miscellaneous maintainer script fixes
  * debian/maas-common.postinst: call adduser and addgroup unconditionally;
    the tools are already designed to DTRT, we don't need to check for the
    user/group existence before calling them nor should we worry about
    calling them only once on first install.
  * debian/maas-common.postrm: delete the maas group, not just the user,
    as the comment in the code implies we should do.
 -- Andres Rodriguez <andreserl@ubuntu.com>   Thu, 07 Mar 2013 14:22:35 -0500