NodeGroupInterface.interface can be the empty string.
Bug #1063881 reported by
Raphaël Badin
This bug affects 1 person
| Affects | Status | Importance | Assigned to | Milestone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MAAS |
Won't Fix
|
Low
|
Unassigned | ||
Bug Description
There is really no reason to allow an interface's name to be empty. This was useful when the interface was store on the NodeGroup object itself because it allowed a nodegroup to be linked to no interface but now that we store the interface information in a proper object (separated from nodegroup), there is no reason to allow an interface to have an empty name.
| summary: |
- NodeGroupInterface.interface can be empty. + NodeGroupInterface.interface can be the empty string. |
| Changed in maas: | |
| status: | Triaged → Won't Fix |
To post a comment you must log in.
