On 01/22/2012 03:20 PM, J Queiroz wrote:
> There are lots of unnoficial backports available. By the way, april is
> coming with a new LTS version.
>
I'm not sure this will get through, but for an LTS edition to be
released without checking the viability of the packages included seems a
major lapse. That a version intended for Long Term Release to suffer
through these issues is incomprehensible.
In my mind an LTS edition is intended to insure long term stability, not
long term instability.
On 01/22/2012 03:20 PM, J Queiroz wrote:
> There are lots of unnoficial backports available. By the way, april is
> coming with a new LTS version.
>
I'm not sure this will get through, but for an LTS edition to be
released without checking the viability of the packages included seems a
major lapse. That a version intended for Long Term Release to suffer
through these issues is incomprehensible.
In my mind an LTS edition is intended to insure long term stability, not
long term instability.
--
*Robert Steinmetz**
Principal*
*Steinmetz & Associates*