RFC: should libpam be in "utility libraries" instead of "base libraries"?

[Jeff Johnson]

The split of libraries into "Base" and Utility" in LSB Core suggests that pam
ought to be in Utility, or possibly even in the Security submodule. I'm not
sure there is any hard and fast rule, so this is just a request for comments.
But... all of the Base libraries are part of the glibc set, and PAM is not.

http://refspecs.linuxbase.org/LSB_4.1.0/LSB-Core-generic/LSB-Core-generic/baselib.html

http://refspecs.linuxbase.org/LSB_4.1.0/LSB-Core-generic/LSB-Core-generic/utillib.html

The Security submodule is now mandatory and part of the Core module so this is
another possible home, though currently we describe it only as network
security.

Probably the best answer is "change nothing" but we've done a lot of other
rationalization in 5.0 so thought I'd just ask this question.