Logos for foreign VCSes

[Jelmer Vernooij]

  affects loggerhead

It would be nice if Loggerhead would show logo's for revisions that
originated in a foreign VCS.

This should be possible according to the svn and git logo policies as
far as I am aware:

http://subversion.org/legal/trademark-policy.html
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Git-logo.svg

We'll need to contact Mercurial about using their logo according to
http://www.selenic.com/pipermail/mercurial/2008-October/021875.html

[Martin Pool (mbp)]

2010/1/18 Jelmer Vernooij <email address hidden>:

> We'll need to contact Mercurial about using their logo according to
> http://www.selenic.com/pipermail/mercurial/2008-October/021875.html

If loggerhead is GPLv2, as I think it is, then that mail seems to give
permission to use it.

--
Martin <http://launchpad.net/~mbp/>

[Matt Nordhoff (mnordhoff)]

Martin Pool wrote:
> If loggerhead is GPLv2, as I think it is, then that mail seems to give
> permission to use it.

Loggerhead is GPLv2+. So...it's probably good?
--
Matt Nordhoff

[Robert Collins (lifeless)]

On Mon, 2010-01-18 at 06:27 +0000, Jelmer Vernooij wrote:

> We'll need to contact Mercurial about using their logo according to
> http://www.selenic.com/pipermail/mercurial/2008-October/021875.html

Loggerhead is GPLv2, I don't see the issue.

-Rob

[Matt Nordhoff (mnordhoff)]

Is Mercurial's logo GPLv2-only or GPLv2+? Loggerhead is the latter, from a couple files I checked. Could that be a problem?

[Robert Collins (lifeless)]

On Tue, 2010-01-19 at 03:40 +0000, Matt Nordhoff wrote:
> Is Mercurial's logo GPLv2-only or GPLv2+? Loggerhead is the latter, from
> a couple files I checked. Could that be a problem?

It would prevent someone using loggerhead under GPL3 from using the hg
logo in combination, thats all.

-Rob