FTBFS on i386/ppc64/s390x (Eoan+Focal)
Affects | Status | Importance | Assigned to | Milestone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
libseccomp |
Fix Released
|
Unknown
|
|||
libseccomp (Ubuntu) |
Fix Released
|
Medium
|
Unassigned | ||
Eoan |
Won't Fix
|
Medium
|
Unassigned |
Bug Description
Due to the python 3.8 transition in focal this was rebuilt but fails atm.
=> https:/
The simulations fail in this case:
batch name: 36-sim-ipc_syscalls
test mode: c
test type: bpf-sim
Test 36-sim-
Test 36-sim-
Test 36-sim-
Test 36-sim-
Test 36-sim-
Test 36-sim-
Test 36-sim-
Test 36-sim-
Test 36-sim-
Test 36-sim-
Test 36-sim-
Test 36-sim-
Test 36-sim-
Test 36-sim-
Test 36-sim-
Test 36-sim-
Test 36-sim-
Test 36-sim-
Test 36-sim-
Test 36-sim-
Test 36-sim-
Test 36-sim-
Test 36-sim-
Test 36-sim-
test mode: c
test type: bpf-valgrind
Test 36-sim-
batch name: 37-sim-
test mode: c
test type: bpf-sim
test arch: s390
batch name: 37-sim-
test mode: c
test type: bpf-sim
test arch: s390
Test 37-sim-
test arch: s390
Test 37-sim-
test arch: s390
Test 37-sim-
test arch: s390
Test 37-sim-
test arch: s390
Test 37-sim-
test arch: s390
Test 37-sim-
test arch: s390
Test 37-sim-
test arch: s390
Test 37-sim-
test arch: s390
Test 37-sim-
test arch: s390
Test 37-sim-
test arch: s390
Test 37-sim-
test arch: s390
Test 37-sim-
test mode: c
test type: bpf-valgrind
Test 37-sim-
It is always the s390x test - even when running on i386/ppc64
On x86_64 this test succeeds:
Test 36-sim-
batch name: 37-sim-
test mode: c
test type: bpf-sim
test arch: s390
Related branches
- Andreas Hasenack: Approve
- Canonical Server: Pending requested
- git-ubuntu developers: Pending requested
-
Diff: 13435 lines (+5091/-4268)51 files modifiedCHANGELOG (+11/-0)
CREDITS (+3/-0)
Makefile.am (+1/-1)
Makefile.in (+1/-1)
README.md (+1/-1)
SECURITY.md (+45/-0)
build-aux/config.guess (+65/-55)
build-aux/config.sub (+1221/-1232)
build-aux/ltmain.sh (+271/-491)
configure (+54/-83)
configure.ac (+3/-3)
debian/changelog (+12/-0)
debian/control (+2/-1)
debian/patches/series (+1/-1)
debian/patches/tests-rely-on-__SNR_xxx-instead-of-__NR_xxx-for-sysc.patch (+47/-0)
debian/rules (+6/-1)
dev/null (+0/-40)
include/Makefile.am (+1/-1)
include/Makefile.in (+1/-1)
include/seccomp-syscalls.h (+2292/-0)
include/seccomp.h (+4/-1066)
include/seccomp.h.in (+3/-1065)
m4/libtool.m4 (+42/-64)
m4/ltoptions.m4 (+1/-1)
m4/ltsugar.m4 (+1/-1)
m4/ltversion.m4 (+6/-6)
m4/lt~obsolete.m4 (+1/-1)
src/arch-aarch64-syscalls.c (+35/-3)
src/arch-arm-syscalls.c (+35/-3)
src/arch-mips-syscalls.c (+43/-11)
src/arch-mips64-syscalls.c (+33/-1)
src/arch-mips64n32-syscalls.c (+33/-1)
src/arch-parisc-syscalls.c (+34/-2)
src/arch-ppc-syscalls.c (+43/-11)
src/arch-ppc64-syscalls.c (+44/-12)
src/arch-s390-syscalls.c (+46/-14)
src/arch-s390.c (+142/-18)
src/arch-s390x-syscalls.c (+47/-15)
src/arch-s390x.c (+143/-17)
src/arch-x32-syscalls.c (+33/-1)
src/arch-x86-syscalls.c (+94/-12)
src/arch-x86.c (+142/-19)
src/arch-x86_64-syscalls.c (+33/-1)
src/db.c (+1/-0)
src/python/Makefile.am (+4/-4)
src/python/Makefile.in (+4/-4)
src/python/seccomp.pyx (+2/-0)
tools/Makefile.am (+0/-2)
tools/Makefile.in (+1/-1)
tools/check-syntax (+1/-0)
tools/scmp_bpf_sim.c (+2/-0)
- Canonical Server packageset reviewers: Pending requested
- Canonical Server: Pending requested
- git-ubuntu developers: Pending requested
-
Diff: 11229 lines (+7153/-0) (has conflicts)50 files modifiedCHANGELOG (+14/-0)
CREDITS (+9/-0)
Makefile.am (+4/-0)
Makefile.in (+4/-0)
README.md (+4/-0)
SECURITY.md (+45/-0)
build-aux/config.guess (+122/-0)
build-aux/config.sub (+1654/-0)
build-aux/ltmain.sh (+554/-0)
configure (+159/-0)
configure.ac (+9/-0)
debian/changelog (+15/-0)
debian/control (+5/-0)
debian/patches/series (+4/-0)
debian/patches/tests-rely-on-__SNR_xxx-instead-of-__NR_xxx-for-sysc.patch (+47/-0)
debian/rules (+10/-0)
include/Makefile.am (+4/-0)
include/Makefile.in (+4/-0)
include/seccomp-syscalls.h (+2292/-0)
include/seccomp.h (+16/-0)
include/seccomp.h.in (+12/-0)
m4/libtool.m4 (+115/-0)
m4/ltoptions.m4 (+4/-0)
m4/ltsugar.m4 (+4/-0)
m4/ltversion.m4 (+16/-0)
m4/lt~obsolete.m4 (+4/-0)
src/arch-aarch64-syscalls.c (+106/-0)
src/arch-arm-syscalls.c (+106/-0)
src/arch-mips-syscalls.c (+115/-0)
src/arch-mips64-syscalls.c (+98/-0)
src/arch-mips64n32-syscalls.c (+98/-0)
src/arch-parisc-syscalls.c (+99/-0)
src/arch-ppc-syscalls.c (+115/-0)
src/arch-ppc64-syscalls.c (+115/-0)
src/arch-s390-syscalls.c (+120/-0)
src/arch-s390.c (+171/-0)
src/arch-s390x-syscalls.c (+120/-0)
src/arch-s390x.c (+172/-0)
src/arch-x32-syscalls.c (+98/-0)
src/arch-x86-syscalls.c (+175/-0)
src/arch-x86.c (+174/-0)
src/arch-x86_64-syscalls.c (+98/-0)
src/db.c (+4/-0)
src/python/Makefile.am (+9/-0)
src/python/Makefile.in (+9/-0)
src/python/seccomp.pyx (+5/-0)
tools/Makefile.am (+3/-0)
tools/Makefile.in (+4/-0)
tools/check-syntax (+4/-0)
tools/scmp_bpf_sim.c (+5/-0)
CVE References
tags: | added: update-excuse |
Changed in libseccomp: | |
status: | Unknown → New |
Changed in libseccomp: | |
status: | New → Fix Released |
Interestingly this is already FTBFS in Eoan.
I have created LXD environments doing rebuilds of the same source and they fail the same way in Eoan and Focal.
The last successful build in Launchpad if from 4th of May, so something else going into Eoan already broke this.