On Sa, Jun 02, 2012 at 12:11:38 (CEST), thom wrote:
> Dear Reinhard,
>
> you wrote:
>>The version that is available from http://ffmpeg.org has evolved,
>>added new features and changed existing behavior
>>that are not supported in ubuntu.
>
> Libav's ffmpeg claims:
> ---
> This program is not developed anymore and is only provided for compatibility. Use avconv instead (see Changelog for the list of incompatible changes).
> ---
>
> The above statements are mutual exclusive.
I don't think so. However, the fact that both the tool name and the
project name are identical does not help to avoid some confusion. It
merely says that the tool /usr/bin/ffmpeg originates from the FFmpeg
project, but is not futher updated anymore to match the latest features
from the FFmpeg project.
> So since I believe you, I filed a bug ( #1007769 ) against libav's
> ffmpeg claim.
On Sa, Jun 02, 2012 at 12:11:38 (CEST), thom wrote:
> Dear Reinhard, ffmpeg. org has evolved,
>
> you wrote:
>>The version that is available from http://
>>added new features and changed existing behavior
>>that are not supported in ubuntu.
>
> Libav's ffmpeg claims:
> ---
> This program is not developed anymore and is only provided for compatibility. Use avconv instead (see Changelog for the list of incompatible changes).
> ---
>
> The above statements are mutual exclusive.
I don't think so. However, the fact that both the tool name and the
project name are identical does not help to avoid some confusion. It
merely says that the tool /usr/bin/ffmpeg originates from the FFmpeg
project, but is not futher updated anymore to match the latest features
from the FFmpeg project.
> So since I believe you, I filed a bug ( #1007769 ) against libav's
> ffmpeg claim.
What bugtracker is that?
--
Gruesse/greetings,
Reinhard Tartler, KeyID 945348A4