2007-01-26 16:08:40 |
Matt Zimmerman |
bug |
|
|
added bug |
2007-01-26 16:11:00 |
Matt Zimmerman |
description |
It sometimes happens that a well-intentioned community member responds inappropriately to a bug filed by a developer. For example, by rejecting the bug, or asking for additional information when the problem is well understood by the relevant developers.
To address this and related problems, I propose the following:
When displaying the names of people in a bug context, if they (are a member of a team which) holds an official role within the project, the emblem of that team should be displayed with their name. For example, teams with upload privileges to the distribution containing a package (for distro bugs), or bug contacts for the product, package or distro.
This would make their role clear to anyone looking at the bug, and help to lend authority to their statements, without the problem of cluttering the display with all of the user's emblems (many of which might not be relevant). |
It sometimes happens that a well-intentioned community member responds inappropriately to a bug filed by a developer. For example, by rejecting the bug, or asking for additional information when the problem is well understood by the relevant developers.
Additionally, in a bug with many comments, it is difficult to distinguish authoritative information from comments by arbitrary Launchpad users.
To address these and related problems, I propose the following:
When displaying the name of the bug reporter or the author of a comment, IF they are a member of a team which holds an official role within the project, the emblem of that team should be displayed with their name. For example, teams with upload privileges to the distribution containing a package (for distro bugs), or bug contacts for the product, package or distro.
This would make their role clear to anyone looking at the bug, and help to lend authority to their statements, without the problem of cluttering the display with all of the user's emblems (many of which might not be relevant). |
|
2007-01-26 16:22:24 |
Matt Zimmerman |
malone: importance |
Undecided |
Wishlist |
|
2007-01-26 16:22:24 |
Matt Zimmerman |
malone: statusexplanation |
|
|
|
2007-01-26 16:41:36 |
Matt Zimmerman |
description |
It sometimes happens that a well-intentioned community member responds inappropriately to a bug filed by a developer. For example, by rejecting the bug, or asking for additional information when the problem is well understood by the relevant developers.
Additionally, in a bug with many comments, it is difficult to distinguish authoritative information from comments by arbitrary Launchpad users.
To address these and related problems, I propose the following:
When displaying the name of the bug reporter or the author of a comment, IF they are a member of a team which holds an official role within the project, the emblem of that team should be displayed with their name. For example, teams with upload privileges to the distribution containing a package (for distro bugs), or bug contacts for the product, package or distro.
This would make their role clear to anyone looking at the bug, and help to lend authority to their statements, without the problem of cluttering the display with all of the user's emblems (many of which might not be relevant). |
It sometimes happens that a well-intentioned community member responds inappropriately to a bug filed by a developer. For example, by rejecting the bug, or asking for additional information when the problem is well understood by the relevant developers.
Additionally, in a bug with many comments, it is difficult to distinguish authoritative information from comments by arbitrary Launchpad users.
To address these and related problems, I propose the following:
When displaying the name of the bug reporter or the author of a comment, *if* they are a member of a team which holds an *official role* within the project, the emblem of that team should be displayed with their name. For example, teams with upload privileges to the distribution containing a package (for distro bugs), or bug contacts for the product, package or distro.
This would make their role clear to anyone looking at the bug, and help to lend authority to their statements, without the problem of cluttering the display with all of the user's emblems (many of which might not be relevant). |
|
2007-01-26 17:33:39 |
Christian Reis |
malone: status |
Unconfirmed |
Confirmed |
|
2007-01-26 17:33:39 |
Christian Reis |
malone: assignee |
|
kiko |
|
2007-01-26 17:33:39 |
Christian Reis |
malone: statusexplanation |
|
How interesting! Very cool idea. It is a bit expensive to implement the lookups but I am thinking abou tit. |
|
2007-01-26 17:34:35 |
Christian Reis |
name |
|
bug-person-emblems |
|
2007-06-12 21:01:40 |
Joey Stanford |
malone: assignee |
kiko |
sinzui-is |
|
2007-06-12 21:01:40 |
Joey Stanford |
malone: statusexplanation |
How interesting! Very cool idea. It is a bit expensive to implement the lookups but I am thinking abou tit. |
Reassigning to Curtis to work into the Badges spec. |
|
2007-07-25 15:17:40 |
Curtis Hovey |
malone: statusexplanation |
Reassigning to Curtis to work into the Badges spec. |
Testing reassignment behaviour of milestone in production. Sorry for the spam. But for anyone truly interested in this bug, I will start on it as soon as OfficialProjectMembersSpec is approved. |
|
2007-08-10 20:02:44 |
Curtis Hovey |
malone: statusexplanation |
Testing reassignment behaviour of milestone in production. Sorry for the spam. But for anyone truly interested in this bug, I will start on it as soon as OfficialProjectMembersSpec is approved. |
I'm pushing this back two releases because I have no approval to work on the OfficialProjectMembers spec, and my 1.1.9 bugs will take most of my development time. |
|
2007-09-11 21:36:40 |
Joey Stanford |
malone: importance |
Wishlist |
Low |
|
2007-10-29 20:32:23 |
Christian Reis |
malone: milestone |
1.1.11 |
1.2.2 |
|
2008-01-21 17:08:39 |
Curtis Hovey |
malone: milestone |
1.2.2 |
|
|
2008-02-20 20:02:21 |
Leann Ogasawara |
name |
bug-person-emblems |
|
|
2008-12-04 18:01:08 |
Curtis Hovey |
malone: status |
Confirmed |
Triaged |
|
2008-12-04 18:01:08 |
Curtis Hovey |
malone: assignee |
sinzui |
|
|
2008-12-04 18:01:08 |
Curtis Hovey |
malone: importance |
Low |
Wishlist |
|
2008-12-04 18:01:08 |
Curtis Hovey |
malone: statusexplanation |
We have not committed to work on this so I removed the milestone. |
The launchpad-registry must provide the infrastructure to answer the question who is a project contributor before this feature can be added. |
|
2010-11-16 15:07:34 |
Andrea Corbellini |
bug |
|
|
added subscriber Andrea Corbellini |
2012-02-16 14:24:07 |
Peter Matulis |
bug |
|
|
added subscriber Peter Matulis |