Activity log for bug #801

Date Who What changed Old value New value Message
2005-05-25 00:00:00 Christian Reis bug added bug
2006-08-18 14:57:09 Brad Bollenbach malone: assignee bradb
2006-08-18 14:57:09 Brad Bollenbach malone: statusexplanation
2007-08-02 21:31:46 Christian Reis malone: status Confirmed Invalid
2007-08-02 21:31:46 Christian Reis malone: statusexplanation The right fix for this is omitting the status and importance, but I haven't managed to convince people to actually do this. :-/
2007-08-02 21:32:33 Christian Reis description I looked at https://launchpad.ubuntu.com/malone/bugs/789 This bug is duped against bug 788, and has a new task on ubuntu dhcpd. I then looked at https://launchpad.ubuntu.com/malone/bugs/788 This bug has one task which is rejected. Does this make sense? Is it not our fault? How could we have done better? I looked at https://launchpad.ubuntu.com/malone/bugs/789 This bug is duped against bug 788, and has a new task on ubuntu dhcpd. I then looked at https://launchpad.ubuntu.com/malone/bugs/788 This bug has one task which is rejected. Does this make sense? Is it not our fault? How could we have done better? I looked at https://launchpad.ubuntu.com/malone/bugs/789 This bug is duped against bug 788, and has a new task on ubuntu dhcpd. I then looked at https://launchpad.ubuntu.com/malone/bugs/788 This bug has one task which is rejected. Does this make sense? Is it not our fault? How could we have done better?