Activity log for bug #66344

Date Who What changed Old value New value Message
2006-10-16 02:56:09 Matthew Paul Thomas bug added bug
2006-10-16 21:38:47 Diogo Matsubara blueprint: status Unconfirmed Confirmed
2006-10-16 21:38:47 Diogo Matsubara blueprint: statusexplanation
2006-12-07 12:53:39 Steve Alexander blueprint: importance Undecided Medium
2006-12-07 12:53:39 Steve Alexander blueprint: assignee stevea
2007-05-13 22:30:25 Jonathan Lange blueprint: importance Medium High
2007-05-13 22:30:25 Jonathan Lange blueprint: statusexplanation Setting to "High". This makes many of our dependency charts useless, which vastly reduces the utility of the blueprint manager.
2008-09-02 22:17:05 Christian Reis blueprint: assignee stevea
2008-09-02 22:17:05 Christian Reis blueprint: statusexplanation Setting to "High". This makes many of our dependency charts useless, which vastly reduces the utility of the blueprint manager.
2008-09-02 22:19:14 Christian Reis description The dependency chart is unreadable for any specification that has more than about a dozen dependencies. For example, <https://features.launchpad.net/products/launchpad/+spec/1.0-web-interface>. This could be fixed by making the dependency levels run vertically, rather than horizontally. This would work better because specification names are shorter than they are wide, so they could be packed more closely together. The dependency chart is unreadable for any specification that has more than about a dozen dependencies. For example, <https://features.launchpad.net/products/launchpad-foundations/+spec/1.0-web-interface>. This could be fixed by making the dependency levels run vertically, rather than horizontally. This would work better because specification names are shorter than they are wide, so they could be packed more closely together.
2008-09-02 22:28:46 Martin Albisetti blueprint: assignee beuno
2008-09-02 22:28:46 Martin Albisetti blueprint: statusexplanation As kiko says, we should look into what dot offers us today, and possibly tweak the page layout a bit so we can use the full width of that part of the screen. A combination of those two will hopefully be enough until we have the infrastructure for 3.0 in place, and we can start using magic.
2008-09-03 19:03:24 Martin Albisetti blueprint: status Confirmed In Progress
2008-09-03 19:03:24 Martin Albisetti blueprint: statusexplanation As kiko says, we should look into what dot offers us today, and possibly tweak the page layout a bit so we can use the full width of that part of the screen. A combination of those two will hopefully be enough until we have the infrastructure for 3.0 in place, and we can start using magic.
2008-09-06 03:27:25 Martin Albisetti blueprint: status In Progress Fix Committed
2008-09-06 03:27:25 Martin Albisetti blueprint: statusexplanation Committed a partial fix for this in revision 6962. Showing between 20 and 30 dependencies should look "acceptable". The long term solution will be using Ajax magic, which we will have soon-ish.
2008-09-06 15:48:15 Martin Albisetti blueprint: status Fix Committed Triaged
2008-09-06 15:48:15 Martin Albisetti blueprint: statusexplanation Committed a partial fix for this in revision 6962. Showing between 20 and 30 dependencies should look "acceptable". The long term solution will be using Ajax magic, which we will have soon-ish. Ah, yes, I forgot about removing the portlet. The case in this bug now looks a bit better, but still unreadable :( Opening the bug again
2009-01-12 22:15:15 Martin Albisetti blueprint: status Triaged In Progress
2009-01-12 22:15:15 Martin Albisetti blueprint: statusexplanation Ah, yes, I forgot about removing the portlet. The case in this bug now looks a bit better, but still unreadable :( Opening the bug again Working on removing the actions portlet
2009-04-07 20:10:52 Martin Albisetti blueprint: status In Progress Fix Committed
2009-04-27 16:05:15 Martin Albisetti blueprint: status Fix Committed Fix Released