Activity log for bug #50699

Date Who What changed Old value New value Message
2006-06-22 16:45:21 Kurt Kraut bug added bug
2006-06-22 16:48:48 Kurt Kraut description Launchpad is a good project but stills a bad tools. It is buggy, crashy and a lot of features are missing. As a member of a few teams, I'm unable to complete the majority of my tasks and I feel a huge lack of opportunities of tasks that could/should be done with Launchpad. This could be easly solved by publishing the Launchpad source code under a free software license like GPL. So everyone would be able to enhance Launchpad, add more feature as fast as our needs of a integrated enviroment for developing grows. Besides that, as Ubuntu is 'free and always will be' we expect as soon as possible that Launchpad, an essencial tool for Ubuntu developing, should be free too. Most of the FUD raised about Ubuntu and Canonical (like Mandriva did for instance) are based in the fac of non-free Lacunhpad, so it should be fixed as soon as possible. I do know that this is already planned, but a schedule, with a deadline, so Canonical will state clearly o the community the intention of turning LP in free software. Launchpad is a good project but stills a bad tool. It is buggy, crashy and a lot of features are missing. As a member of a few teams, I'm unable to complete the majority of my tasks and I feel a huge lack of opportunities of tasks that could/should be done with Launchpad. Doing the translations of Ubuntu is a very painfull and not manageable taks. This could be easly solved by publishing the Launchpad source code under a free software license like GPL. So everyone would be able to enhance Launchpad, add more feature as fast as our needs of a integrated enviroment for developing grows. Besides that, as Ubuntu is 'free and always will be' we expect as soon as possible that Launchpad, an essencial tool for Ubuntu developing, should be free too. Most of the FUD raised about Ubuntu and Canonical (like Mandriva did for instance) are based in the fac of non-free Lacunhpad, so it should be fixed as soon as possible. I do know that this is already planned, but a schedule, with a deadline should be immediatly set, so Canonical will state clearly o the community the intention of turning LP in free software.
2006-06-22 16:49:40 Kurt Kraut bug added subscriber Og Maciel
2006-06-22 16:50:10 Kurt Kraut bug added subscriber Fábio Nogueira
2006-06-22 16:50:40 Kurt Kraut bug added subscriber Álvaro Justen
2006-06-22 20:45:48 Matthew Paul Thomas launchpad: status Unconfirmed Confirmed
2006-06-22 20:45:48 Matthew Paul Thomas launchpad: importance Untriaged Medium
2006-06-22 20:45:48 Matthew Paul Thomas launchpad: statusexplanation
2006-06-22 20:49:14 Matthew Paul Thomas description Launchpad is a good project but stills a bad tool. It is buggy, crashy and a lot of features are missing. As a member of a few teams, I'm unable to complete the majority of my tasks and I feel a huge lack of opportunities of tasks that could/should be done with Launchpad. Doing the translations of Ubuntu is a very painfull and not manageable taks. This could be easly solved by publishing the Launchpad source code under a free software license like GPL. So everyone would be able to enhance Launchpad, add more feature as fast as our needs of a integrated enviroment for developing grows. Besides that, as Ubuntu is 'free and always will be' we expect as soon as possible that Launchpad, an essencial tool for Ubuntu developing, should be free too. Most of the FUD raised about Ubuntu and Canonical (like Mandriva did for instance) are based in the fac of non-free Lacunhpad, so it should be fixed as soon as possible. I do know that this is already planned, but a schedule, with a deadline should be immediatly set, so Canonical will state clearly o the community the intention of turning LP in free software. Launchpad is a good project but still a bad tool. It is buggy, crashy and many features are missing. As a member of a few teams, I'm unable to complete the majority of my tasks and I feel a huge lack of opportunity when tasks could/should be done with Launchpad. Doing the translations of Ubuntu is very painful and not manageable. This could easily be solved by publishing the Launchpad source code under a free software license like GPL. So everyone would be able to enhance Launchpad, and add more features as fast as our need for an integrated development environment grows. Besides that, as Ubuntu is 'free and always will be', we expect as soon as possible that Launchpad, an essential tool for Ubuntu developing, should be free too. Most of the FUD raised about Ubuntu and Canonical (like Mandriva did for instance) are based on the fact of non-free Launchpad, so it should be fixed as soon as possible. I do know that this is already planned, but a schedule with a deadline should immediately be set, so that Canonical can state clearly to the community the intention of making LP free software.
2006-09-23 15:58:44 towsonu2003 bug assigned to malone (upstream)
2006-10-30 01:56:43 Caroline Ford malone: status Unconfirmed Rejected
2006-10-30 01:56:43 Caroline Ford malone: statusexplanation It's not malone and launchpad. Malone is part of launchpad. Malone ->Rejected
2006-11-27 10:57:16 John Leach launchpad: assignee sabdfl
2007-03-07 22:55:04 Chris Wagner title Launchpad should be free software (free as freedom) Launchpad should be free software (free as in freedom)
2007-04-18 08:42:07 Mark Shuttleworth launchpad: status Confirmed In Progress
2007-11-06 07:05:22 Bhavani Shankar bug assigned to rosetta
2007-11-06 07:06:29 Bhavani Shankar bug assigned to launchpad-answers
2007-11-06 07:10:34 Bhavani Shankar bug assigned to ubuntu
2007-11-06 08:24:05 William Grant None: status New Invalid
2007-11-12 16:35:59 Francis J. Lacoste launchpad-answers: importance Undecided Low
2007-11-12 16:35:59 Francis J. Lacoste launchpad-answers: status New Confirmed
2007-11-12 16:36:58 Francis J. Lacoste launchpad-answers: importance Low Medium
2007-11-15 02:07:58 Joey Stanford malone: importance Undecided Medium
2007-11-15 02:07:58 Joey Stanford malone: status Invalid Confirmed
2007-11-15 02:08:16 Joey Stanford rosetta: importance Undecided Medium
2007-11-15 02:08:16 Joey Stanford rosetta: status New Confirmed
2008-05-27 17:35:00 James Troup bug added subscriber The Canonical Sysadmins
2008-05-27 19:30:16 TAA bug added attachment 'unnamed' (unnamed)
2008-07-17 17:27:48 Jeroen T. Vermeulen rosetta: status Confirmed Invalid
2008-08-19 19:16:46 Joey Stanford malone: status Confirmed Invalid
2008-08-19 19:17:45 Joey Stanford launchpad-answers: status Confirmed Invalid
2008-08-19 19:17:45 Joey Stanford launchpad-answers: statusexplanation The marking of the other products as invalid doesn't invalid this bug. We're tracking all items against the launchpad project itself for triaging purposes and this bug is filed against that.
2008-09-12 14:03:46 Diogo Matsubara launchpad: status New Invalid
2008-09-12 14:03:46 Diogo Matsubara launchpad: statusexplanation Closing the launchpad task as this work will be tracked on launchpad-foundations. We're now using launchpad project as the initial triage queue. Bugs filed against launchpad are then re-targeted to the appropriate launchpad sub-project (e.g. malone, rosetta, foundations, launchpad-bazaar, soyuz, etc) after the initial triage. Thanks
2009-07-21 05:24:04 Karl Fogel launchpad-foundations: status In Progress Fix Released
2009-07-21 05:27:30 Karl Fogel launchpad-answers: status Invalid Fix Released
2009-07-21 05:27:37 Karl Fogel malone: status Invalid Fix Released
2009-07-21 05:27:44 Karl Fogel rosetta: status Invalid Fix Released
2009-07-21 05:27:53 Karl Fogel launchpad: status Invalid Fix Released
2009-07-21 05:28:04 Karl Fogel ubuntu: status Invalid Fix Released
2012-02-23 21:31:01 Kai Kasurinen removed subscriber Kai Kasurinen