On Mon, 2010-06-07 at 10:22 +0000, Julian Edwards wrote:
> In the most recent case, the builders were disabled, which is the
> correct thing to do. So in terms of "handling" the problem, I'm not sure
> what else it should be doing. I don't think performing an automatic
> reset is really correct in case someone needs to debug a builder
> problem.
>
Maybe we should be approaching it slightly differently. What causes a
"Fault 8002"? If we don't exactly know, perhaps that's where the focus
of this bug should be...
On Mon, 2010-06-07 at 10:22 +0000, Julian Edwards wrote:
> In the most recent case, the builders were disabled, which is the
> correct thing to do. So in terms of "handling" the problem, I'm not sure
> what else it should be doing. I don't think performing an automatic
> reset is really correct in case someone needs to debug a builder
> problem.
>
Maybe we should be approaching it slightly differently. What causes a
"Fault 8002"? If we don't exactly know, perhaps that's where the focus
of this bug should be...