POFile stats warnings are bogus or being ignored

[Stuart Bishop]

rosetta-pofile-stats.py emits large amounts of warnings every day:

== POFile stats Thu Jul 2 10:05:50 UTC 2009 ==
2009-07-02 10:05:51 INFO creating lockfile
2009-07-02 10:05:56 INFO Starting verification of POFile stats at id 0
2009-07-02 10:08:40 WARNING POFile 115468: cached stats were (0, 0, 110, 0), recomputed as (0, 1, 110, 0)
2009-07-02 10:08:43 WARNING POFile 115533: cached stats were (336, 13, 13, 13), recomputed as (336, 13, 13, 6)
2009-07-02 10:08:44 WARNING POFile 115534: cached stats were (181, 26, 77, 1), recomputed as (182, 36, 77, 1)
2009-07-02 10:08:44 WARNING POFile 115536: cached stats were (63, 0, 0, 0), recomputed as (64, 0, 0, 0)
2009-07-02 10:08:44 WARNING POFile 115539: cached stats were (286, 3, 3, 3), recomputed as (291, 3, 3, 2)
2009-07-02 10:08:44 WARNING POFile 115541: cached stats were (145, 21, 25, 30), recomputed as (148, 21, 25, 27)

If this is normal, these messages should not be warnings (debug or info).

If this is a problem, we need a process in place so the losas can fix it or escalate the problem to someone who can fix it.

[Stuart Bishop (stub)]

Setting to high as this is an operational issue. The volume of output causes genuine issues to get lost in the noise. If these are genuine problems, log level should still be reduced and a note added to the bug report to reinstate the warning once we can cope with the issue.

[Данило Шеган (danilo)]

We can lower their importance to INFO: there's nothing to be done about them by LOSAs (or anyone else fwiw).

[Данило Шеган (danilo)]

I'll change the logging level along with a fix for #411327.

[Данило Шеган (danilo)]

Fixed in devel 9082.