| 2006-04-03 14:00:58 |
Sebastien Bacher |
bug |
|
|
added bug |
| 2006-04-10 20:42:31 |
Christian Reis |
malone: assignee |
|
matsubara |
|
| 2006-04-10 20:42:31 |
Christian Reis |
malone: statusexplanation |
|
Can you try and confirm, Matsubara? Essentially, Sebastian is saying that the source package name field in +editstatus accepted a binary package name. |
|
| 2006-04-10 21:49:51 |
Diogo Matsubara |
description |
* put a binary package as source pack
* validate the choice
The change is accepted, it should not. That's confusing, the page is set to a "wrong context" then (the actions of the right column are relative to the package name)
|
In the +editstatus page, entering a binary package in the source package field should generate a error message.
Steps to reproduce:
1. In any open bug reported on Ubuntu, go to the +editstatus page;
2. Put a binary package (e.g. gstreamer0.10-plugins-good) as source package;
2. Click on Save changes;
3. You're redirected to https://staging.ubuntu.com/distros/ubuntu/+source/gstreamer0.10-plugins-good/+bug/$bugnumber
That's confusing, the page is set to a "wrong context" then (the actions of the right column are relative to the package name). |
|
| 2006-04-10 21:49:51 |
Diogo Matsubara |
title |
accept binary package as source package |
+editstatu should not acccept binary package as source package |
|
| 2006-04-10 21:50:11 |
Diogo Matsubara |
malone: status |
Unconfirmed |
Confirmed |
|
| 2006-04-10 21:50:11 |
Diogo Matsubara |
malone: statusexplanation |
Can you try and confirm, Matsubara? Essentially, Sebastian is saying that the source package name field in +editstatus accepted a binary package name. |
|
|
| 2006-04-10 22:04:56 |
Diogo Matsubara |
title |
+editstatu should not acccept binary package as source package |
+editstatus should not accept binary package as source package |
|
| 2006-05-11 10:13:18 |
Scott James Remnant (Canonical) |
malone: severity |
Normal |
Critical |
|
| 2006-05-11 10:13:18 |
Scott James Remnant (Canonical) |
malone: statusexplanation |
|
This is a critical bug, it is causing reports to get lost because the bug status subscribers for the source package DO NOT GET THEM! |
|
| 2006-05-18 19:26:29 |
Diogo Matsubara |
malone: assignee |
matsubara |
kiko |
|
| 2006-05-18 19:26:29 |
Diogo Matsubara |
malone: statusexplanation |
This is a critical bug, it is causing reports to get lost because the bug status subscribers for the source package DO NOT GET THEM! |
|
|
| 2006-05-22 18:53:51 |
Christian Reis |
malone: status |
Confirmed |
Fix Committed |
|
| 2006-05-22 18:53:51 |
Christian Reis |
malone: statusexplanation |
|
Landed in PQM, needs rolling out and then cleaning up of data. |
|
| 2006-08-03 17:49:25 |
Christian Reis |
malone: status |
Fix Committed |
Fix Released |
|
| 2006-08-03 17:49:25 |
Christian Reis |
malone: statusexplanation |
Landed in PQM, needs rolling out and then cleaning up of data. |
Bug 54710 is where we're tracking the database cleanup side of this. |
|
