Activity log for bug #326056

Date Who What changed Old value New value Message
2009-02-06 07:19:57 Paul Hummer bug added bug
2009-02-06 07:20:09 Paul Hummer launchpad-bazaar: status New Triaged
2009-02-06 07:20:09 Paul Hummer launchpad-bazaar: importance Undecided Low
2009-02-06 07:20:09 Paul Hummer launchpad-bazaar: statusexplanation
2009-02-20 01:43:04 Jonathan Lange launchpad-bazaar: importance Low High
2009-02-20 01:43:04 Jonathan Lange launchpad-bazaar: statusexplanation It's telling users they've screwed up when they haven't and generating OOPSes. This is enough to make it a high priority bug. Surely we can come up with something that will stop the errors without requiring substantial changes to our data model!
2009-02-20 01:44:03 Jonathan Lange description This is a weird edge case, but one that I think is worth filing a bug for. So I did a code review for Entertainer and sent it, then immediately merged the branch into trunk and pushed up to launchpad. The scanner apparently marked the BMP as merged before my review with ' status approved' could get handled. This resulted in this oops: https://devpad.canonical.com/~matsubara/oops.cgi/2009-02-06/CEMAIL5 If nothing else, maybe we should just catch the exception and silently pass an changing the status if it's in a state that doesn't make sense to go "back" to approved for (like non-final states). This is a weird edge case, but one that I think is worth filing a bug for. So I did a code review for Entertainer and sent it, then immediately merged the branch into trunk and pushed up to launchpad. The scanner apparently marked the BMP as merged before my review with ' status approved' could get handled. This resulted in this oops: https://devpad.canonical.com/~matsubara/oops.cgi/2009-02-06/CEMAIL5 If nothing else, maybe we should just catch the exception and silently pass an changing the status if it's in a state that doesn't make sense to go "back" to approved for (like non-final states). See OOPS-1138CEMAIL12
2009-02-20 01:45:23 Diogo Matsubara description This is a weird edge case, but one that I think is worth filing a bug for. So I did a code review for Entertainer and sent it, then immediately merged the branch into trunk and pushed up to launchpad. The scanner apparently marked the BMP as merged before my review with ' status approved' could get handled. This resulted in this oops: https://devpad.canonical.com/~matsubara/oops.cgi/2009-02-06/CEMAIL5 If nothing else, maybe we should just catch the exception and silently pass an changing the status if it's in a state that doesn't make sense to go "back" to approved for (like non-final states). See OOPS-1138CEMAIL12 This is a weird edge case, but one that I think is worth filing a bug for. So I did a code review for Entertainer and sent it, then immediately merged the branch into trunk and pushed up to launchpad. The scanner apparently marked the BMP as merged before my review with ' status approved' could get handled. This resulted in this oops: OOPS-1133CEMAIL5 If nothing else, maybe we should just catch the exception and silently pass an changing the status if it's in a state that doesn't make sense to go "back" to approved for (like non-final states). Recently: OOPS-1138CEMAIL12
2009-02-20 01:45:23 Diogo Matsubara title OOPS on InvalidStateTransition when reviewing code by mail OOPS on BadStateTransition when reviewing code by mail
2009-04-07 21:48:41 Ursula Junque description This is a weird edge case, but one that I think is worth filing a bug for. So I did a code review for Entertainer and sent it, then immediately merged the branch into trunk and pushed up to launchpad. The scanner apparently marked the BMP as merged before my review with ' status approved' could get handled. This resulted in this oops: OOPS-1133CEMAIL5 If nothing else, maybe we should just catch the exception and silently pass an changing the status if it's in a state that doesn't make sense to go "back" to approved for (like non-final states). Recently: OOPS-1138CEMAIL12 This is a weird edge case, but one that I think is worth filing a bug for. So I did a code review for Entertainer and sent it, then immediately merged the branch into trunk and pushed up to launchpad. The scanner apparently marked the BMP as merged before my review with ' status approved' could get handled. This resulted in this oops: OOPS-1133CEMAIL5 If nothing else, maybe we should just catch the exception and silently pass an changing the status if it's in a state that doesn't make sense to go "back" to approved for (like non-final states). Recently: OOPS-1138CEMAIL12, OOPS-1192CEMAIL4
2009-06-12 19:37:34 Aaron Bentley launchpad-code: status Triaged Fix Committed
2009-06-12 19:37:34 Aaron Bentley launchpad-code: assignee Aaron Bentley (abentley)
2009-07-02 20:08:18 Aaron Bentley launchpad-code: status Fix Committed Fix Released