2006-02-08 12:28:53 |
Diogo Matsubara |
description |
https://launchpad.net/distros/ubuntu/+search?text=at tells be that 'at' doesn't exist in Ubuntu.
The existance of https://launchpad.net/distros/ubuntu/+source/at suggests otherwise.
The following conversation might be interesting:
<jbailey> Trying here before filing a bug. https://launchpad.net/distros/ubuntu/+search?text=at claims that there's no source package "at" in Ubuntu. I'm fairly certain there is.
<jbailey> Which of us is confused?
<Kinnison> the statistician may be confused
<jbailey> Kinnison: Sorry, I'm not sure if you're 1) Being Humourous, 2) Sleep Deprived, 3) Refering to something I've never heard of.
<jbailey> =)
<Kinnison> 3
<Kinnison> and 2
<Kinnison> definitely not 1
<Kinnison> well, not deliberately anyway
<jbailey> Ah. =)
<jbailey> Is there something I can usefull report on this/
<Kinnison> 1. report a bug in /products/soyuz
<Kinnison> 2. 'at' may be a stopword in the fti we use
|
When searching for 'at' here:
https://launchpad.net/distros/ubuntu/+search?text=at
The search result should point, at least, to here:
https://launchpad.net/distros/ubuntu/+source/at
The following conversation might be interesting:
<jbailey> Trying here before filing a bug. https://launchpad.net/distros/ubuntu/+search?text=at claims that there's no source package "at" in Ubuntu. I'm fairly certain there is.
<jbailey> Which of us is confused?
<Kinnison> the statistician may be confused
<jbailey> Kinnison: Sorry, I'm not sure if you're 1) Being Humourous, 2) Sleep Deprived, 3) Refering to something I've never heard of.
<jbailey> =)
<Kinnison> 3
<Kinnison> and 2
<Kinnison> definitely not 1
<Kinnison> well, not deliberately anyway
<jbailey> Ah. =)
<jbailey> Is there something I can usefull report on this/
<Kinnison> 1. report a bug in /products/soyuz
<Kinnison> 2. 'at' may be a stopword in the fti we use
|
|