[feature-request] status pages for uploaded packages

[Matthias Klose]

a status page for uploaded packages is missing, such status should be a one liner consisting of
 - the source package name
 - the source version
 - the "State" of the build for each architecture
 - a link to the last build log for each architecture

Such an entry becomes less interesting, when a package is sucessfully built for each architecture (and available in the archive, so having information of Built, but still in NEW is still important).

These pages should be available for all packages with at least one arch with a state not equal to "binary in the archive", the pages should be available for

- all packages in ubuntu/main
- all packages in ubuntu/universe, ubuntu/multiverse
- all packages uploaded (changelog entry or signer of changes file)
- all packages having the same QA contact

Rationale / use case: Have a feedback about builds. This is currently a regression to the build log information on p.d.o. (at least there is such information selectable for one package).

http://qa.ubuntuwire.org/ftbfs/ provides some of this functionality, but it is less than filterable and doesn't check the queue.

[Celso Providelo (cprov)]

It makes a lot of sense. Let's split the request in smaller pieces:

 * Expose Queue System information in the web UI (specially NEW, REJECTED, althrough there is the email feedback in place)

 * Define a way to navigate "oriented by component" in the web UI (old known request already)

 Do they still making sense for you ?

[Matthias Klose (doko)]

> * Expose Queue System information in the web UI (specially NEW, > REJECTED, althrough there is the email feedback in place)

makes sense, as long as the information I mentioned (including build logs) is still available.

> * Define a way to navigate "oriented by component" in the web UI > (old known request already)

not sure, if what "component" does mean. If you consider uploader / developer a "component" as well, that makes sense.

[Celso Providelo (cprov)]

Part of 'Queue Exposure' task

[Celso Providelo (cprov)]

RF 3322

[Celso Providelo (cprov)]

Matthias, have you checked the current code ? what else we can do for you?

[Matthias Klose (doko)]

Celso Providelo schrieb:
> Matthias, have you checked the current code ? what else we can do for
> you?

- packages with no problems cannot be hidden, but you can sort by
  the appropriate columns.

- packages in NEW are not shown.

- looking now at https://launchpad.net/people/openoffice-pkgs/+packages
  I see ... nothing, so maybe one could have a list of subscribed
  packages as well. But that maybe is another thing.

Matthias

[Matthias Klose (doko)]

Celso, reopened, please let me know, if we should break down that report in followup-reports

see my comments in the previous comment, plus

- the "Failures" column has the value "None" if the package is uploaded, but not yet built
- the list gets very long, older uploads are not removed

[Celso Providelo (cprov)]

Parts mentioned in this request are already done in "Queue Exposure", despite the fact that it's not integrated in the $user/+packages page.
Personally I think we should start a new spec for the "Uploaded Packages" page and refactor missing bits properly.