Activity log for bug #286
| Date | Who | What changed | Old value | New value | Message |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2005-04-02 00:00:00 | Matthias Urlichs | bug | added bug | ||
| 2005-04-02 00:00:00 | Celso Providelo | add subscriber Celso Providelo (Watch) | |||
| 2005-04-02 00:00:00 | Celso Providelo | subscriber Celso Providelo | 1 | 2 | |
| 2005-04-12 00:00:00 | Morgan Collett | doap: assignee | name101 | ||
| 2005-05-27 00:00:00 | Morgan Collett | doap: product | <Product at 0x43d145ec> | <Product at 0x44cab6ac> | |
| 2005-06-29 22:08:13 | Celso Providelo | launchpad: status | New | Accepted | |
| 2005-06-29 22:08:13 | Celso Providelo | launchpad: statusexplanation | old bug, comments were added on page and it's very clear we only accept clearsigned signatures; but the discussion still openned: should we accept also Deatached Signatures for CoC ? I'm partially against since the Signature entry shall embed the document content. | ||
| 2005-09-07 08:48:16 | Celso Providelo | launchpad: status | Accepted | Fixed | |
| 2005-09-07 08:48:16 | Celso Providelo | launchpad: statusexplanation | old bug, comments were added on page and it's very clear we only accept clearsigned signatures; but the discussion still openned: should we accept also Deatached Signatures for CoC ? I'm partially against since the Signature entry shall embed the document content. | New requestes are addressed in bug # 1798. The main issue pointed in the but is already solved |
