security.ubuntu.com only provides amd64 and i386 binaries

Bug #2065641 reported by Alex Murray

This bug report will be marked for expiration in 46 days if no further activity occurs. (find out why)

10
This bug affects 1 person
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
Launchpad itself
Incomplete
Undecided
Unassigned
Ubuntu
Incomplete
Undecided
Unassigned

Bug Description

security.ubuntu.com exists to provide priority access to security updates for Ubuntu. Currently, only the amd64 and i386 packages are provided - this leaves the other architectures at a disadvantage since they can only get security updates from the archive mirrors which have various time lags in how often they update.

security.ubuntu.com should therefore provide binaries for all of the supported Ubuntu architectures.

Revision history for this message
Guruprasad (lgp171188) wrote :

Hi Alex, it is not clear to me if Launchpad is involved in the publishing of security.ubuntu.com. Do you have any additional information, references, or context to help us figure this out? If yes, can you share it?

Changed in launchpad:
status: New → Incomplete
Revision history for this message
Alex Murray (alexmurray) wrote :

Guruprasad - I am not certain if Launchpad is involved in this publishing - in fact, I am not sure at all what is involved in the publishing to security.ubuntu.com - so I filed this against Launchpad as it was the closest thing I could think of. Perhaps @wgrant or @vorlon might know?

Revision history for this message
Steve Langasek (vorlon) wrote :

This is definitely launchpad-driven. I am surprised to learn that only amd64 and i386 are published to security.ubuntu.com, I know of no reason for this to be the case: the archive/ports split is for mirroring, but the point of security. is to have an endpoint for security updates that doesn't depend on mirroring.

For architectures NOT on security.u.c, the correct behavior for installers etc. is to point to ports.ubuntu.com for the security pocket instead of to any mirrors, but we don't maintain a list of mirrors for ports that our installers will point you at anyway, so in practice I don't see that there's a user-affecting problem here?

joey king (joeyking)
Changed in ubuntu:
status: New → Incomplete
To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.