jammy support everywhere

Bug #2040203 reported by Nobuto Murata
10
This bug affects 1 person
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
Landscape Bundles
In Progress
High
Mitch Burton

Bug Description

The landscape deployment still relies on focal. And we should use the latest LTS, jammy, everywhere.

$ juju info landscape-scalable
...
channels: |
  latest/stable: 23 2023-08-01 (23) 1kB @
  latest/candidate: ↑
  latest/beta: 22 2023-08-01 (22) 1kB @
  latest/edge: 22 2023-05-16 (22) 1kB @

Rev. 23 has focal as the default series and only landscape-server has an override as jammy. haproxy, postgresql, and rabbitmq-server units will be on focal.

$ juju download landscape-scalable --channel latest/stable
Fetching bundle "landscape-scalable" revision 23 using "latest/stable" channel and base "amd64/ubuntu/22.04"
Install the "landscape-scalable" bundle with:
    juju deploy ./landscape-scalable_r23.bundle

$ unzip -d landscape-scalable_stable ./landscape-scalable_r23.bundle

$ grep series landscape-scalable_stable/bundle.yaml
series: focal
    series: jammy

Rev. 22 has jammy as the default series but haproxy has an override as focal.

$ juju download landscape-scalable --channel latest/edge
Fetching bundle "landscape-scalable" revision 22 using "latest/edge" channel and base "amd64/ubuntu/22.04"
Install the "landscape-scalable" bundle with:
    juju deploy ./landscape-scalable_r22.bundle

$ unzip -d landscape-scalable_edge ./landscape-scalable_r22.bundle

$ grep series landscape-scalable_edge/bundle.yaml
series: jammy
    series: focal

Revision history for this message
Nobuto Murata (nobuto) wrote :

Subscribing ~field-high.

Changed in landscape-bundles:
status: New → Confirmed
importance: Undecided → High
assignee: nobody → Mitch Burton (mitchburton)
Revision history for this message
Mitch Burton (mitchburton) wrote :

Testing replacing the haproxy and rabbitmq-server revisions in the scalable bundle with revisions that can deploy to jammy.

Changed in landscape-bundles:
status: Confirmed → In Progress
Revision history for this message
Mitch Burton (mitchburton) wrote :

Looks like some work will be required to make things compatible with the latest rev of haproxy. I've opened LP: #2040331 to resolve this.

To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.