Summary of email conversation between Ike Panhc and <email address hidden>:
On 2020/6/1 12:17, Ike Panhc wrote:
...
> Since our target is 51e8439f3496 ("net: hns3: add 8 BD limit for tx flow"),
> and we have its fix d1a37dedcfcf ("net: hns3: fix a use after free problem in hns3_nic_maybe_stop_tx()")
>
> Are patches 3fe13ed95dd3 ("net: hns3: avoid mult + div op in critical data path") and
> 5f543a54eec0 ("net: hns3: fix for not calculating tx bd num correctly") needed too?
>
> If they are not, it will be much simpler and less risk for regression.
>
Hi Ike:
This two is not need. Thanks.
<End of summary>
Based on this, the next step is to investigate backporting the two patches that directly address the subject of this bug report.
Summary of email conversation between Ike Panhc and <email address hidden>:
On 2020/6/1 12:17, Ike Panhc wrote: maybe_stop_ tx()")
...
> Since our target is 51e8439f3496 ("net: hns3: add 8 BD limit for tx flow"),
> and we have its fix d1a37dedcfcf ("net: hns3: fix a use after free problem in hns3_nic_
>
> Are patches 3fe13ed95dd3 ("net: hns3: avoid mult + div op in critical data path") and
> 5f543a54eec0 ("net: hns3: fix for not calculating tx bd num correctly") needed too?
>
> If they are not, it will be much simpler and less risk for regression.
>
Hi Ike:
This two is not need. Thanks.
<End of summary>
Based on this, the next step is to investigate backporting the two patches that directly address the subject of this bug report.