Comment 1 for bug 1212939

[22:01] <morganfainberg> clarkb: in my tox environment i'm seeing /vendor/python-keystoneclient-master, which is the only thing that could be referencing netaddr
[22:01] <morganfainberg> though the pip freeze says i have python-keystoneclient==0.2.5 (activated venv)
[22:02] <clarkb> morganfainberg: is this one of those silly tests that downloads a specific version of a thing and does functional testing?
[22:03] <morganfainberg> clarkb: i, i don't think so, i'm looking at stable/grizzly to see.
[22:03] <dolphm> clarkb: yes!
[22:03] <morganfainberg> give me a moment.
[22:03] <morganfainberg> trust dolphm, he's i'm sure right
[22:03] <stevemar> morganfainberg: just a quick flake8 test, and a change to run my tests again, and i'll submit new patch
[22:03] <morganfainberg> stevemar: cool.
[22:04] <morganfainberg> dolphm , clarkb: wait, we do grizzly stable against master for obvious reasons. it's just not doing the proper dep thing then?
[22:04] <morganfainberg> or am i taking crazy pills (lack of understanding)
[22:04] *** alunduil (~alunduil@12.144.179.211) joined
[22:05] <stevemar> just a quick rebase ....
[22:05] <clarkb> morganfainberg: I think testing that particular combo is fine (mordred is workign on making it generalized) but the implementation is fragiel
[22:05] *** SergeyLukjanov quit (Quit: Computer has gone to sleep.)
[22:05] <morganfainberg> clarkb: got it.
[22:06] <clarkb> morganfainberg: looks like it simply clones keystoneclient and does not install it
[22:06] <morganfainberg> clarkb: so, in this case should jerryz file a bug? and if so, is this infra?
[22:06] <clarkb> see keystone/test.py:checkout_vendor
[22:06] <morganfainberg> oh so it's us.
[22:06] <morganfainberg> ok.
[22:06] <clarkb> yes, no. This is a keystone stable/grizzly unittest bug
[22:06] <morganfainberg> yep yep got it