linux-lts-xenial: 4.4.0-41.61~14.04.1 -proposed tracker

Bug #1628229 reported by Brad Figg
26
This bug affects 1 person
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
Kernel SRU Workflow
Fix Released
Medium
Unassigned
Automated-testing
Fix Released
Medium
Canonical Kernel Team
Certification-testing
Fix Released
Medium
Yung Shen
Prepare-package
Fix Released
Medium
Kamal Mostafa
Prepare-package-meta
Fix Released
Medium
Kamal Mostafa
Prepare-package-signed
Fix Released
Medium
Kamal Mostafa
Promote-to-proposed
Fix Released
Medium
Andy Whitcroft
Promote-to-security
Confirmed
Medium
Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team
Promote-to-updates
Confirmed
Medium
Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team
Regression-testing
Fix Released
Medium
Canonical Kernel Team
Security-signoff
Fix Released
Medium
Canonical Security Team
Verification-testing
Fix Released
Medium
Canonical Kernel Team
linux-lts-xenial (Ubuntu)
Invalid
Undecided
Unassigned
Trusty
Fix Released
Medium
Unassigned

Bug Description

This bug is for tracking the 4.4.0-41.61~14.04.1 upload package. This bug will contain status and testing results related to that upload.

For an explanation of the tasks and the associated workflow see: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Kernel/kernel-sru-workflow
-- swm properties --
boot-testing-requested: true
derivative-trackers-created: true
kernel-stable-master-bug: 1628204
phase: Promoted to proposed
proposed-announcement-sent: true
proposed-testing-requested: true

Brad Figg (brad-figg)
tags: added: kernel-release-tracking-bug
tags: added: block-proposed
tags: added: block-proposed-xenial
tags: added: block-proposed-trusty
tags: added: trusty
Changed in linux-lts-xenial (Ubuntu Trusty):
status: New → Confirmed
Changed in kernel-sru-workflow:
status: New → In Progress
importance: Undecided → Medium
Changed in linux-lts-xenial (Ubuntu):
status: New → Invalid
Changed in linux-lts-xenial (Ubuntu Trusty):
importance: Undecided → Medium
Brad Figg (brad-figg)
description: updated
description: updated
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : modoc (ppc64el) - tests ran: 1, failed: 1
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : ms10-35-mcdivittB0-kernel (arm64) - tests ran: 1, failed: 1
Brad Figg (brad-figg)
description: updated
description: updated
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : onza (amd64) - tests ran: 1, failed: 1
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : onza (i386) - tests ran: 1, failed: 1
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : ms10-35-mcdivittB0-kernel (arm64) - tests ran: 83, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : modoc (ppc64el) - tests ran: 10, failed: 1
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : modoc (ppc64el) - tests ran: 2, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : modoc (ppc64el) - tests ran: 4, failed: 1
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : modoc (ppc64el) - tests ran: 19, failed: 5
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : modoc (ppc64el) - tests ran: 136, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : modoc (ppc64el) - tests ran: 83, failed: 20
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : dwalin (amd64) - tests ran: 10, failed: 1
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : dwalin (amd64) - tests ran: 30, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : dwalin (amd64) - tests ran: 4, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : dwalin (amd64) - tests ran: 19, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : dwalin (amd64) - tests ran: 136, failed: 2
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : dwalin (amd64) - tests ran: 83, failed: 32
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : onza (i386) - tests ran: 3, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : onza (amd64) - tests ran: 4, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : onza (i386) - tests ran: 4, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : onza (i386) - tests ran: 136, failed: 2
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : onza (amd64) - tests ran: 136, failed: 2
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : onza (amd64) - tests ran: 83, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : onza (i386) - tests ran: 19, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : onza (amd64) - tests ran: 19, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : onibi (amd64) - tests ran: 30, failed: 1
Revision history for this message
Yung Shen (kaxing) wrote :

Hardware Certification have begun testing this -proposed kernel.

Revision history for this message
Yung Shen (kaxing) wrote :

Hardware Certification have completed testing this -proposed kernel. No regressions were observed, results are available here: http://people.canonical.com/~hwcert/sru-testing/trusty/4.4.0-41.61~14.04.1/trusty-4.4-proposed-frozen.html

tags: added: certification-testing-passed
Brad Figg (brad-figg)
tags: added: regression-testing-passed
Brad Figg (brad-figg)
Changed in linux-lts-xenial (Ubuntu Trusty):
status: Confirmed → Fix Released
Changed in kernel-sru-workflow:
status: In Progress → Fix Released
To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Duplicates of this bug

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.