linux: 3.19.0-81.89 -proposed tracker

Bug #1661699 reported by Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo
12
This bug affects 1 person
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
Kernel SRU Workflow
Fix Released
Medium
Unassigned
Automated-testing
Fix Released
Medium
Canonical Kernel Team
Certification-testing
Invalid
Medium
Canonical Hardware Certification
Prepare-package
Fix Released
Medium
Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo
Prepare-package-meta
Fix Released
Medium
Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo
Prepare-package-signed
Fix Released
Medium
Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo
Promote-to-proposed
Fix Released
Medium
Andy Whitcroft
Promote-to-security
Fix Released
Medium
Steve Langasek
Promote-to-updates
Fix Released
Medium
Steve Langasek
Regression-testing
Fix Released
Medium
Po-Hsu Lin
Security-signoff
Fix Released
Medium
Steve Beattie
Upload-to-ppa
Invalid
Medium
Canonical Kernel Team
Verification-testing
Fix Released
Medium
Po-Hsu Lin
linux (Ubuntu)
Invalid
Undecided
Unassigned
Vivid
Fix Released
Undecided
Unassigned

Bug Description

This bug is for tracking the 3.19.0-81.89 upload package. This bug will contain status and testing results related to that upload.

For an explanation of the tasks and the associated workflow see: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Kernel/kernel-sru-workflow

-- swm properties --
boot-testing-requested: true
derivative-trackers-created: true
phase: Released
proposed-announcement-sent: true
proposed-testing-requested: true

CVE References

tags: added: kernel-release-tracking-bug
tags: added: block-proposed-vivid
tags: added: vivid
Changed in kernel-sru-workflow:
status: New → In Progress
importance: Undecided → Medium
Changed in linux (Ubuntu):
status: New → Invalid
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : Packages available

Backport packages from packages here can be worked on, the following tracking bugs were opened for them:
linux-lts-vivid (14.04.1) - bug 1662707

description: updated
description: updated
Andy Whitcroft (apw)
Changed in linux (Ubuntu Vivid):
status: New → Confirmed
Brad Figg (brad-figg)
description: updated
description: updated
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : fozzie (amd64) - tests ran: 1, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : fozzie (i386) - tests ran: 1, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : rumford (amd64) - tests ran: 141, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : pepe (amd64) - tests ran: 10, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : gonzo (amd64) - tests ran: 141, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : modoc (ppc64el) - tests ran: 1, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : fozzie (amd64) - tests ran: 19, failed: 1
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : pepe (i386) - tests ran: 10, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : gonzo (i386) - tests ran: 141, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : modoc (ppc64el) - tests ran: 10, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : amura (amd64) - tests ran: 33, failed: 4
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : pepe (amd64) - tests ran: 33, failed: 6
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : fozzie (i386) - tests ran: 19, failed: 1
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : modoc (ppc64el) - tests ran: 1, failed: 1
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : pepe (i386) - tests ran: 3, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : modoc (ppc64el) - tests ran: 7, failed: 2
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : modoc (ppc64el) - tests ran: 19, failed: 4
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : gonzo (amd64) - tests ran: 1, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : modoc (ppc64el) - tests ran: 16, failed: 3
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : gonzo (i386) - tests ran: 1, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : rumford (amd64) - tests ran: 1, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : gonzo (amd64) - tests ran: 1, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : modoc (ppc64el) - tests ran: 141, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : gonzo (i386) - tests ran: 1, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : rumford (amd64) - tests ran: 1, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : rumford (amd64) - tests ran: 33, failed: 4
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : rumford (amd64) - tests ran: 16, failed: 1
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : rumford (amd64) - tests ran: 19, failed: 1
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : amura (amd64) - tests ran: 1, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : rumford (amd64) - tests ran: 141, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Taihsiang Ho (tai271828) wrote :

Set the status of "Certification-testing" as "Invalid" according to the sync up meeting of Cert and Kernel team.

Brad Figg (brad-figg)
tags: added: regression-testing-passed
tags: removed: regression-testing-passed
Revision history for this message
Po-Hsu Lin (cypressyew) wrote :

No bug tagged with verification-needed.

Revision history for this message
Po-Hsu Lin (cypressyew) wrote :

Regression test CMPL, looking good.
http://kernel.ubuntu.com/testing/tracker-index.html

Issue to note in amd64:
    ubuntu_kvm_unit_tests - fail item seen before, no regression
    libhugetlbfs - function not support by kernel
    ubuntu_kernel_selftests - "user" test failed, can be reproduced on previous kernel

Issue to note in i386:
    libhugetlbfs - function not support by kernel

Issue to note in ppc64le:
    iosched_bugs - failed to build
    xfstests - fail item seen before, no regression
    libhugetlbfs - function not support by kernel
    ubuntu_lxc - unable to download packages
    rtc - fail item seen before, no regression
    ubuntu_kvm_unit_tests - spapr_hcall failure caused by the old qemu version, verified with qemu 2.8.0
    ubuntu_squashfs_smoke_test - fail item seen before, no regression

Po-Hsu Lin (cypressyew)
tags: added: regression-testing-passed
Revision history for this message
Launchpad Janitor (janitor) wrote :

This bug was fixed in the package linux - 3.19.0-81.89

---------------
linux (3.19.0-81.89) vivid; urgency=low

  [ Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo ]

  * Release Tracking Bug
    - LP: #1661699

  [ Luis Henriques ]
  * CVE-2016-7911
    - block: fix use-after-free in sys_ioprio_get()

  * CVE-2016-7910
    - block: fix use-after-free in seq file

 -- Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo <email address hidden> Fri, 03 Feb 2017 15:58:32 -0200

Changed in linux (Ubuntu Vivid):
status: Confirmed → Fix Released
Brad Figg (brad-figg)
description: updated
description: updated
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : Package Released!

The package has been published and the bug is being set to Fix Released

Changed in kernel-sru-workflow:
status: In Progress → Fix Released
description: updated
description: updated
Brad Figg (brad-figg)
tags: added: cscc
To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.