linux-lts-xenial: 4.4.0-41.61~14.04.1 -proposed tracker

Bug #1628229 reported by Brad Figg
26
This bug affects 1 person
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
Kernel SRU Workflow
Fix Released
Medium
Unassigned
Automated-testing
Fix Released
Medium
Canonical Kernel Team
Certification-testing
Fix Released
Medium
Yung Shen
Prepare-package
Fix Released
Medium
Kamal Mostafa
Prepare-package-meta
Fix Released
Medium
Kamal Mostafa
Prepare-package-signed
Fix Released
Medium
Kamal Mostafa
Promote-to-proposed
Fix Released
Medium
Andy Whitcroft
Promote-to-security
Confirmed
Medium
Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team
Promote-to-updates
Confirmed
Medium
Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team
Regression-testing
Fix Released
Medium
Canonical Kernel Team
Security-signoff
Fix Released
Medium
Canonical Security Team
Verification-testing
Fix Released
Medium
Canonical Kernel Team
linux-lts-xenial (Ubuntu)
Invalid
Undecided
Unassigned
Trusty
Fix Released
Medium
Unassigned

Bug Description

This bug is for tracking the 4.4.0-41.61~14.04.1 upload package. This bug will contain status and testing results related to that upload.

For an explanation of the tasks and the associated workflow see: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Kernel/kernel-sru-workflow
-- swm properties --
boot-testing-requested: true
derivative-trackers-created: true
kernel-stable-master-bug: 1628204
phase: Promoted to proposed
proposed-announcement-sent: true
proposed-testing-requested: true

Brad Figg (brad-figg)
tags: added: kernel-release-tracking-bug
tags: added: block-proposed
tags: added: block-proposed-xenial
tags: added: block-proposed-trusty
tags: added: trusty
Changed in linux-lts-xenial (Ubuntu Trusty):
status: New → Confirmed
Changed in kernel-sru-workflow:
status: New → In Progress
importance: Undecided → Medium
Changed in linux-lts-xenial (Ubuntu):
status: New → Invalid
Changed in linux-lts-xenial (Ubuntu Trusty):
importance: Undecided → Medium
Brad Figg (brad-figg)
description: updated
description: updated
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : modoc (ppc64el) - tests ran: 1, failed: 1
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : ms10-35-mcdivittB0-kernel (arm64) - tests ran: 1, failed: 1
Brad Figg (brad-figg)
description: updated
description: updated
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : onza (amd64) - tests ran: 1, failed: 1
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : onza (i386) - tests ran: 1, failed: 1
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : ms10-35-mcdivittB0-kernel (arm64) - tests ran: 83, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : modoc (ppc64el) - tests ran: 10, failed: 1
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : modoc (ppc64el) - tests ran: 2, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : modoc (ppc64el) - tests ran: 4, failed: 1
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : modoc (ppc64el) - tests ran: 19, failed: 5
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : modoc (ppc64el) - tests ran: 136, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : modoc (ppc64el) - tests ran: 83, failed: 20
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : dwalin (amd64) - tests ran: 10, failed: 1
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : dwalin (amd64) - tests ran: 30, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : dwalin (amd64) - tests ran: 4, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : dwalin (amd64) - tests ran: 19, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : dwalin (amd64) - tests ran: 136, failed: 2
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : dwalin (amd64) - tests ran: 83, failed: 32
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : onza (i386) - tests ran: 3, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : onza (amd64) - tests ran: 4, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : onza (i386) - tests ran: 4, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : onza (i386) - tests ran: 136, failed: 2
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : onza (amd64) - tests ran: 136, failed: 2
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : onza (amd64) - tests ran: 83, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : onza (i386) - tests ran: 19, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : onza (amd64) - tests ran: 19, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : onibi (amd64) - tests ran: 30, failed: 1
Revision history for this message
Yung Shen (kaxing) wrote :

Hardware Certification have begun testing this -proposed kernel.

Revision history for this message
Yung Shen (kaxing) wrote :

Hardware Certification have completed testing this -proposed kernel. No regressions were observed, results are available here: http://people.canonical.com/~hwcert/sru-testing/trusty/4.4.0-41.61~14.04.1/trusty-4.4-proposed-frozen.html

tags: added: certification-testing-passed
Brad Figg (brad-figg)
tags: added: regression-testing-passed
Brad Figg (brad-figg)
Changed in linux-lts-xenial (Ubuntu Trusty):
status: Confirmed → Fix Released
Changed in kernel-sru-workflow:
status: In Progress → Fix Released
To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Duplicates of this bug

Other bug subscribers