linux-lts-xenial: 4.4.0-80.101~14.04.1 -proposed tracker

Bug #1696358 reported by Kleber Sacilotto de Souza
12
This bug affects 1 person
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
Kernel SRU Workflow
In Progress
Medium
Unassigned
Automated-testing
Fix Released
Medium
Canonical Kernel Team
Certification-testing
In Progress
Medium
Taihsiang Ho
Prepare-package
Fix Released
Medium
Kleber Sacilotto de Souza
Prepare-package-meta
Fix Released
Medium
Kleber Sacilotto de Souza
Prepare-package-signed
Fix Released
Medium
Kleber Sacilotto de Souza
Promote-to-proposed
Fix Released
Medium
Łukasz Zemczak
Promote-to-security
New
Medium
Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team
Promote-to-updates
New
Medium
Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team
Regression-testing
Fix Released
Medium
Canonical Kernel Team
Security-signoff
Fix Released
Medium
Canonical Security Team
Upload-to-ppa
New
Medium
Canonical Kernel Team
Verification-testing
Confirmed
Medium
Canonical Kernel Team
linux-lts-xenial (Ubuntu)
Invalid
Undecided
Unassigned
Trusty
New
Undecided
Unassigned

Bug Description

This bug is for tracking the <version to be filled> upload package. This bug will contain status and testing results related to that upload.

For an explanation of the tasks and the associated workflow see: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Kernel/kernel-sru-workflow
-- swm properties --
boot-testing-requested: true
kernel-stable-master-bug: 1696357
phase: Promoted to proposed
proposed-announcement-sent: true
proposed-testing-requested: true

tags: added: kernel-release-tracking-bug
tags: added: block-proposed-precise
tags: added: block-proposed-trusty
tags: added: trusty
Changed in kernel-sru-workflow:
status: New → In Progress
importance: Undecided → Medium
Changed in linux-lts-xenial (Ubuntu):
status: New → Invalid
tags: added: kernel-sru-cycle-2017.06.07-1
tags: added: kernel-sru-backport-of-1696357
summary: - linux-lts-xenial: <version to be filled> -proposed tracker
+ linux-lts-xenial: 4.4.0-80.101~14.04.1 -proposed tracker
Brad Figg (brad-figg)
description: updated
description: updated
Brad Figg (brad-figg)
description: updated
description: updated
Brad Figg (brad-figg)
tags: added: block-proposed
description: updated
Brad Figg (brad-figg)
description: updated
description: updated
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : amaura (amd64) - tests ran: 1, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : amaura (amd64) - tests ran: 33, failed: 3
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : fozzie (amd64) - tests ran: 1, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : fozzie (i386) - tests ran: 1, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : fozzie (amd64) - tests ran: 19, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : fozzie (i386) - tests ran: 19, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : ms10-34-mcdivittB0-kernel (arm64) - tests ran: 1, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : ms10-34-mcdivittB0-kernel (arm64) - tests ran: 2, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : ms10-34-mcdivittB0-kernel (arm64) - tests ran: 10, failed: 2
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : ms10-34-mcdivittB0-kernel (arm64) - tests ran: 3, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : ms10-34-mcdivittB0-kernel (arm64) - tests ran: 4, failed: 1
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : ms10-34-mcdivittB0-kernel (arm64) - tests ran: 14, failed: 2
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : ms10-34-mcdivittB0-kernel (arm64) - tests ran: 141, failed: 2
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : onza (amd64) - tests ran: 33, failed: 4
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : archytas (amd64) - tests ran: 1, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : archytas (amd64) - tests ran: 2, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : archytas (amd64) - tests ran: 10, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : archytas (amd64) - tests ran: 5, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : archytas (amd64) - tests ran: 4, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : archytas (amd64) - tests ran: 19, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : archytas (amd64) - tests ran: 141, failed: 2
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : gonzo (amd64) - tests ran: 1, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : gonzo (i386) - tests ran: 1, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : gonzo (amd64) - tests ran: 2, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : gonzo (i386) - tests ran: 2, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : gonzo (amd64) - tests ran: 141, failed: 2
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : gonzo (i386) - tests ran: 141, failed: 2
tags: added: regression-testing-passed
Revision history for this message
Taihsiang Ho (tai271828) wrote :

Hardware Certification have begun testing this -proposed kernel.

Revision history for this message
John Johansen (jjohansen) wrote :

looks good

To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.