linux-hwe: 4.8.0-52.55~16.04.1 -proposed tracker

Bug #1686978 reported by Stefan Bader
12
This bug affects 1 person
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
Kernel SRU Workflow
Fix Released
Medium
Unassigned
Automated-testing
Fix Released
Medium
Canonical Kernel Team
Certification-testing
Fix Released
Medium
Taihsiang Ho
Prepare-package
Fix Released
Medium
Stefan Bader
Prepare-package-meta
Fix Released
Medium
Stefan Bader
Prepare-package-signed
Fix Released
Medium
Stefan Bader
Promote-to-proposed
Fix Released
Medium
Andy Whitcroft
Promote-to-security
Fix Released
Medium
Łukasz Zemczak
Promote-to-updates
Fix Released
Medium
Łukasz Zemczak
Regression-testing
Fix Released
Medium
Po-Hsu Lin
Security-signoff
Fix Released
Medium
Canonical Security Team
Upload-to-ppa
Invalid
Medium
Canonical Kernel Team
Verification-testing
Fix Released
Medium
Canonical Kernel Team
linux-hwe (Ubuntu)
Invalid
Undecided
Unassigned
Xenial
Fix Released
Medium
Unassigned

Bug Description

This bug is for tracking the <version to be filled> upload package. This bug will contain status and testing results related to that upload.

For an explanation of the tasks and the associated workflow see: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Kernel/kernel-sru-workflow
-- swm properties --
boot-testing-requested: true
kernel-stable-master-bug: 1686976
phase: Released
proposed-announcement-sent: true
proposed-testing-requested: true

CVE References

Stefan Bader (smb)
tags: added: kernel-release-tracking-bug
tags: added: block-proposed-xenial
tags: added: xenial
Changed in linux-hwe (Ubuntu Xenial):
status: New → Confirmed
Changed in kernel-sru-workflow:
status: New → In Progress
importance: Undecided → Medium
Changed in linux-hwe (Ubuntu):
status: New → Invalid
Changed in linux-hwe (Ubuntu Xenial):
importance: Undecided → Medium
tags: added: kernel-sru-cycle-2017.04.25-1
tags: added: kernel-sru-backport-of-1686976
Stefan Bader (smb)
summary: - linux-hwe: <version to be filled> -proposed tracker
+ linux-hwe: 4.8.0-52.55~16.04.1 -proposed tracker
Brad Figg (brad-figg)
description: updated
description: updated
Brad Figg (brad-figg)
tags: added: block-proposed
description: updated
description: updated
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : hainzel (amd64) - tests ran: 1, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : secchi (amd64) - tests ran: 1, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : ms10-35-mcdivittB0-kernel (arm64) - tests ran: 1, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : rumford (amd64) - tests ran: 1, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : fozzie (amd64) - tests ran: 1, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : secchi (amd64) - tests ran: 1, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : gonzo (amd64) - tests ran: 1, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : hainzel (amd64) - tests ran: 1, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : rumford (amd64) - tests ran: 1, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : pepe (amd64) - tests ran: 1, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : fozzie (i386) - tests ran: 1, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : gonzo (i386) - tests ran: 1, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : pepe (i386) - tests ran: 1, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : fozzie (amd64) - tests ran: 1, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : gonzo (amd64) - tests ran: 1, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : pepe (amd64) - tests ran: 1, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : fozzie (i386) - tests ran: 1, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : gonzo (i386) - tests ran: 1, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : amaura (amd64) - tests ran: 1, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : pepe (i386) - tests ran: 1, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : amaura (amd64) - tests ran: 1, failed: 0
Brad Figg (brad-figg)
description: updated
description: updated
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote :
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : secchi (amd64) - tests ran: 1, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : amaura (amd64) - tests ran: 34, failed: 3
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : amaura (amd64) - tests ran: 2, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : secchi (amd64) - tests ran: 20, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : fozzie (amd64) - tests ran: 1, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : amaura (amd64) - tests ran: 64, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : fozzie (i386) - tests ran: 1, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : amaura (amd64) - tests ran: 1, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : amaura (amd64) - tests ran: 34, failed: 3
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : secchi (amd64) - tests ran: 10, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : amaura (amd64) - tests ran: 2, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : fozzie (amd64) - tests ran: 19, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : amaura (amd64) - tests ran: 64, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : secchi (amd64) - tests ran: 6, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : secchi (amd64) - tests ran: 16, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : pepe (amd64) - tests ran: 1, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : fozzie (i386) - tests ran: 19, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : hainzel (amd64) - tests ran: 1, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : pepe (i386) - tests ran: 1, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : fozzie (amd64) - tests ran: 1, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : secchi (amd64) - tests ran: 19, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : fozzie (i386) - tests ran: 1, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : hainzel (amd64) - tests ran: 20, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : pepe (amd64) - tests ran: 20, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : rumford (amd64) - tests ran: 1, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : secchi (amd64) - tests ran: 141, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : secchi (amd64) - tests ran: 2, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : fozzie (amd64) - tests ran: 19, failed: 1
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : pepe (i386) - tests ran: 7, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : hainzel (amd64) - tests ran: 10, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : rumford (amd64) - tests ran: 20, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : secchi (amd64) - tests ran: 1, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : fozzie (i386) - tests ran: 19, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : hainzel (amd64) - tests ran: 6, failed: 1
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : pepe (amd64) - tests ran: 10, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : hainzel (amd64) - tests ran: 16, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : secchi (amd64) - tests ran: 20, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : rumford (amd64) - tests ran: 10, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : pepe (i386) - tests ran: 10, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : hainzel (amd64) - tests ran: 19, failed: 1
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : rumford (amd64) - tests ran: 34, failed: 4
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : pepe (amd64) - tests ran: 34, failed: 4
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : secchi (amd64) - tests ran: 10, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : hainzel (amd64) - tests ran: 141, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : pepe (i386) - tests ran: 4, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : secchi (amd64) - tests ran: 6, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : hainzel (amd64) - tests ran: 2, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : secchi (amd64) - tests ran: 16, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : pepe (amd64) - tests ran: 16, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : pepe (i386) - tests ran: 16, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : hainzel (amd64) - tests ran: 64, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : hainzel (amd64) - tests ran: 1, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : secchi (amd64) - tests ran: 19, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : pepe (amd64) - tests ran: 19, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : secchi (amd64) - tests ran: 141, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : hainzel (amd64) - tests ran: 20, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : secchi (amd64) - tests ran: 2, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : pepe (i386) - tests ran: 19, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : secchi (amd64) - tests ran: 64, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : hainzel (amd64) - tests ran: 10, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : pepe (amd64) - tests ran: 141, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : hainzel (amd64) - tests ran: 6, failed: 1
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : pepe (i386) - tests ran: 141, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : hainzel (amd64) - tests ran: 16, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : pepe (amd64) - tests ran: 2, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : rumford (amd64) - tests ran: 3, failed: 2
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : hainzel (amd64) - tests ran: 19, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : pepe (amd64) - tests ran: 64, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : rumford (amd64) - tests ran: 19, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : hainzel (amd64) - tests ran: 141, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : pepe (amd64) - tests ran: 1, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : pepe (i386) - tests ran: 1, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : hainzel (amd64) - tests ran: 2, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : rumford (amd64) - tests ran: 141, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : rumford (amd64) - tests ran: 2, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : hainzel (amd64) - tests ran: 64, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : pepe (amd64) - tests ran: 20, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : rumford (amd64) - tests ran: 64, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : gonzo (amd64) - tests ran: 1, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : rumford (amd64) - tests ran: 1, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : gonzo (i386) - tests ran: 1, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : gonzo (amd64) - tests ran: 20, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : rumford (amd64) - tests ran: 20, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : gonzo (i386) - tests ran: 7, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : rumford (amd64) - tests ran: 10, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : rumford (amd64) - tests ran: 34, failed: 3
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : gonzo (amd64) - tests ran: 141, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : gonzo (i386) - tests ran: 141, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : gonzo (amd64) - tests ran: 2, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : gonzo (amd64) - tests ran: 64, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : gonzo (amd64) - tests ran: 1, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : gonzo (i386) - tests ran: 1, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : gonzo (amd64) - tests ran: 20, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : gonzo (i386) - tests ran: 7, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : gonzo (amd64) - tests ran: 141, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : gonzo (i386) - tests ran: 141, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : gonzo (amd64) - tests ran: 2, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : rumford (amd64) - tests ran: 18, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : rumford (amd64) - tests ran: 141, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : gonzo (amd64) - tests ran: 64, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : rumford (amd64) - tests ran: 2, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : rumford (amd64) - tests ran: 64, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : pepe (amd64) - tests ran: 10, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Taihsiang Ho (tai271828) wrote :

Hardware Certification have begun testing this -proposed kernel.

Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : pepe (i386) - tests ran: 10, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : pepe (amd64) - tests ran: 34, failed: 4
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : pepe (i386) - tests ran: 4, failed: 1
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : pepe (amd64) - tests ran: 16, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : pepe (i386) - tests ran: 16, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : pepe (amd64) - tests ran: 18, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : pepe (i386) - tests ran: 18, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : pepe (amd64) - tests ran: 141, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : pepe (i386) - tests ran: 141, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : pepe (amd64) - tests ran: 2, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : pepe (amd64) - tests ran: 64, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : pepe (i386) - tests ran: 7, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : ms10-35-mcdivittB0-kernel (arm64) - tests ran: 64, failed: 1
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : wright-kernel (arm64) - tests ran: 64, failed: 1
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : ms10-35-mcdivittB0-kernel (arm64) - tests ran: 10, failed: 1
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : ms10-35-mcdivittB0-kernel (arm64) - tests ran: 20, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : rumford (amd64) - tests ran: 19, failed: 2
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : ms10-35-mcdivittB0-kernel (arm64) - tests ran: 9, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : ms10-35-mcdivittB0-kernel (arm64) - tests ran: 16, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : ms10-35-mcdivittB0-kernel (arm64) - tests ran: 14, failed: 1
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : ms10-35-mcdivittB0-kernel (arm64) - tests ran: 141, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : ms10-35-mcdivittB0-kernel (arm64) - tests ran: 2, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : ms10-35-mcdivittB0-kernel (arm64) - tests ran: 1, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : wright-kernel (arm64) - tests ran: 10, failed: 1
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : wright-kernel (arm64) - tests ran: 20, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : wright-kernel (arm64) - tests ran: 9, failed: 4
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : wright-kernel (arm64) - tests ran: 16, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : wright-kernel (arm64) - tests ran: 14, failed: 1
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : wright-kernel (arm64) - tests ran: 141, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : secchi (amd64) - tests ran: 64, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : wright-kernel (arm64) - tests ran: 2, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : wright-kernel (arm64) - tests ran: 1, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : fozzie (amd64) - tests ran: 19, failed: 1
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : hainzel (amd64) - tests ran: 19, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : rumford (amd64) - tests ran: 34, failed: 3
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : pepe (i386) - tests ran: 4, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : hainzel (amd64) - tests ran: 6, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Po-Hsu Lin (cypressyew) wrote :

4.8.0-52.55~16.04.1 - generic
Regression test CMPL, looking good.
http://kernel.ubuntu.com/testing/tracker-index.html

Issue to note in amd64:
  monotonic_time - gtod failed on hainzel, passed after retest.
  ubuntu_kvm_unit_tests - failed to start on hainzel, secchi. smap, pku, svm and hyperv_clock failed, issue seen before.
  ubuntu_lxc - failed with amd64-lowlatency/generic on hainzel, generic on rumford (container failed to start), re-tested and passed.
  xfstests - partition sdb being used on rumford for xfs, btrfs/010 output mismatch, first test on this kernel but issue can be seen in 4.8.0-46.49, no regression.

Issue to note in arm64:
  hwclock - failed on ms10-35-mcdivittB0-kernel, issue seen before, works on wright-kernel
  rtc - failed on wright-kernel, RTC_AIE_ON ioctl: Invalid argument, works on another node.
  ubuntu_kvm_unit_tests - all passed on ms10-35-mcdivittB0-kernel, but failed on the new node wright-kernel, needs investigatation.
  ubuntu_qrt_apparmor - sysctl read function not implemented, issue seen before.
  ubuntu_zfs_xfs_generic - issue seen before in 4.8.0-46.49~16.04.1, test 079 failed with acl: Function not implemented, 317 failed with output mismatch.

Issue to note in i386:
  ubuntu_lxc - failed with i386-lowlatency on pepe (container failed to start), re-tested and passed.

Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : hainzel (amd64) - tests ran: 6, failed: 1
Po-Hsu Lin (cypressyew)
tags: added: regression-testing-passed
Revision history for this message
Taihsiang Ho (tai271828) wrote :

Hardware Certification have completed testing this -proposed kernel. No regressions were observed, results are available here: http://people.canonical.com/~hwcert/sru-testing/xenial/4.8.0-52.55~16.04.1/xenial-4.8-proposed-published.html

tags: added: certification-testing-passed
Brad Figg (brad-figg)
tags: removed: block-proposed-xenial
tags: removed: block-proposed
Revision history for this message
Launchpad Janitor (janitor) wrote :

This bug was fixed in the package linux-hwe - 4.8.0-52.55~16.04.1

---------------
linux-hwe (4.8.0-52.55~16.04.1) xenial; urgency=low

  * linux-hwe: 4.8.0-52.55~16.04.1 -proposed tracker (LP: #1686978)

  * linux: 4.8.0-52.55 -proposed tracker (LP: #1686976)

  * CVE-2017-7477: macsec: avoid heap overflow in skb_to_sgvec (LP: #1685892)
    - macsec: avoid heap overflow in skb_to_sgvec
    - macsec: dynamically allocate space for sglist

  * net/ipv4: original ingress device index set as the loopback interface.
    (LP: #1683982)
    - net: fix incorrect original ingress device index in PKTINFO

  * Touchpad not working correctly after kernel upgrade (LP: #1662589)
    - Input: ALPS - fix V8+ protocol handling (73 03 28)

  * ifup service of network device stay active after driver stop (LP: #1672144)
    - net: use net->count to check whether a netns is alive or not

  * [Hyper-V] mkfs regression in kernel 4.4+ (LP: #1682215)
    - block: relax check on sg gap

  * Potential memory corruption with capi adapters (LP: #1681469)
    - powerpc/mm: Add missing global TLB invalidate if cxl is active

  * [Hyper-V/Azure] Please include Mellanox OFED drivers in Azure kernel and
    image (LP: #1650058)
    - net/mlx4_en: Fix bad WQE issue
    - net/mlx4_core: Fix racy CQ (Completion Queue) free
    - net/mlx4_core: Fix when to save some qp context flags for dynamic VST to VGT
      transitions
    - net/mlx4_core: Avoid command timeouts during VF driver device shutdown

 -- Stefan Bader <email address hidden> Fri, 28 Apr 2017 12:17:12 +0200

Changed in linux-hwe (Ubuntu Xenial):
status: Confirmed → Fix Released
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : Package Released!

The package has been published and the bug is being set to Fix Released

Changed in kernel-sru-workflow:
status: In Progress → Fix Released
description: updated
description: updated
To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.