Comment 96 for bug 1686414

Regression tests completed successfully.

Issues to note:

* amd64
- ubuntu_bpf: testcase fails to apply a patch to enable bpf.
- ubuntu_kvm_unit_tests: some testcases fail, not a regression
- ubuntu_lxc: fails on some systems, not a regression
- xfstests: fails for btrfs and xfs, passes for ext4. Not a regression.
- ubuntu_unionmount_overlayfs_suite: failed in one of the systems, passes on others.

* arm64
- rtc: failed in one of the systems, passes on others.
- ubuntu_bpf: testcase fails to apply a patch to enable bpf.
- ubuntu_lxc: failed in one of the systems, passes on others.
- hwclock: failed in one of the systems, passes on others.
- ubuntu_kernel_selftests: some testcases failed, same as before. Not a regression.
- ubuntu_zfs_xfs_generic: some testcases failed, same as before. Not a regression.

* i386
- xfstests: fails for btrfs and xfs, passes for ext4. Not a regression.
- ubuntu_bpf: testcase fails to apply a patch to enable bpf.

* s390x (zKVM)
- aio_dio_bugs: failed as before, not a regression.
- libhugetlbfs: failed as before, not a regression.
- ubuntu_bpf: testcase fails to apply a patch to enable bpf.
- scrashme: failed as before, not a regression.
- ubuntu_ecryptfs: some testcases failed, same as before. Not a regression.

* s390x (zVM)
- aio_dio_bugs: failed as before, not a regression.
- libhugetlbfs: failed as before, not a regression.
- ubuntu_bpf: testcase fails to apply a patch to enable bpf.
- scrashme: failed as before, not a regression.
- ubuntu_ecryptfs: some testcases failed, same as before. Not a regression.