linux: 4.8.0-47.50 -proposed tracker

Bug #1679678 reported by Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo
This bug report is a duplicate of:  Bug #1684427: linux: 4.8.0-49.52 -proposed tracker. Edit Remove
12
This bug affects 1 person
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
Kernel SRU Workflow
In Progress
Medium
Unassigned
Automated-testing
Incomplete
Medium
Canonical Kernel Team
Certification-testing
Fix Released
Medium
Taihsiang Ho
Prepare-package
Fix Released
Medium
Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo
Prepare-package-meta
Fix Released
Medium
Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo
Prepare-package-signed
Fix Released
Medium
Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo
Promote-to-proposed
Fix Released
Medium
Łukasz Zemczak
Promote-to-security
New
Medium
Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team
Promote-to-updates
New
Medium
Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team
Regression-testing
Confirmed
Medium
Canonical Kernel Team
Security-signoff
Fix Released
Medium
Steve Beattie
Upload-to-ppa
Invalid
Medium
Unassigned
Verification-testing
Confirmed
Medium
Canonical Kernel Team
linux (Ubuntu)
Invalid
Undecided
Unassigned
Yakkety
Fix Released
Undecided
Unassigned

Bug Description

This bug is for tracking the <version to be filled> upload package. This bug will contain status and testing results related to that upload.

For an explanation of the tasks and the associated workflow see: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Kernel/kernel-sru-workflow

backports: 1679679,1679682
derivatives: 1679684
-- swm properties --
boot-testing-requested: true
phase: Promoted to proposed
proposed-announcement-sent: true
proposed-testing-requested: true

CVE References

tags: added: kernel-release-tracking-bug
tags: added: block-proposed
tags: added: block-proposed-yakkety
tags: added: yakkety
Changed in kernel-sru-workflow:
status: New → In Progress
importance: Undecided → Medium
Changed in linux (Ubuntu):
status: New → Invalid
tags: added: kernel-sru-cycle-2017.04.04-1
tags: added: kernel-sru-master-kernel
description: updated
summary: - linux: <version to be filled> -proposed tracker
+ linux: 4.8.0-47.50 -proposed tracker
Brad Figg (brad-figg)
description: updated
description: updated
Brad Figg (brad-figg)
description: updated
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : archytas (amd64) - tests ran: 1, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : fozzie (amd64) - tests ran: 1, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : hainzel (amd64) - tests ran: 1, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : ms10-34-mcdivittB0-kernel (arm64) - tests ran: 1, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : gonzo (amd64) - tests ran: 1, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : secchi (amd64) - tests ran: 1, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : gonzo (i386) - tests ran: 1, failed: 0
Brad Figg (brad-figg)
description: updated
description: updated
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : amaura (amd64) - tests ran: 1, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Taihsiang Ho (tai271828) wrote :

Hardware Certification have begun testing this -proposed kernel.

Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : fozzie (amd64) - tests ran: 1, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : fozzie (i386) - tests ran: 1, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : ms10-34-mcdivittB0-kernel (arm64) - tests ran: 1, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : ms10-35-mcdivittB0-kernel (arm64) - tests ran: 1, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : fozzie (amd64) - tests ran: 19, failed: 1
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : ms10-34-mcdivittB0-kernel (arm64) - tests ran: 19, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : ms10-35-mcdivittB0-kernel (arm64) - tests ran: 19, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : pepe (amd64) - tests ran: 10, failed: 2
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : fozzie (i386) - tests ran: 19, failed: 1
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : pepe (i386) - tests ran: 10, failed: 2
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : ms10-34-mcdivittB0-kernel (arm64) - tests ran: 10, failed: 3
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : ms10-35-mcdivittB0-kernel (arm64) - tests ran: 10, failed: 3
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : pepe (amd64) - tests ran: 37, failed: 5
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : ms10-34-mcdivittB0-kernel (arm64) - tests ran: 9, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : ms10-35-mcdivittB0-kernel (arm64) - tests ran: 9, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : ms10-34-mcdivittB0-kernel (arm64) - tests ran: 16, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : ms10-35-mcdivittB0-kernel (arm64) - tests ran: 16, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : pepe (i386) - tests ran: 4, failed: 1
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : ms10-34-mcdivittB0-kernel (arm64) - tests ran: 14, failed: 1
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : ms10-35-mcdivittB0-kernel (arm64) - tests ran: 14, failed: 1
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : secchi (amd64) - tests ran: 1, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : ms10-34-mcdivittB0-kernel (arm64) - tests ran: 141, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : ms10-35-mcdivittB0-kernel (arm64) - tests ran: 141, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : ms10-34-mcdivittB0-kernel (arm64) - tests ran: 2, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : ms10-35-mcdivittB0-kernel (arm64) - tests ran: 2, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : secchi (amd64) - tests ran: 19, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : ms10-34-mcdivittB0-kernel (arm64) - tests ran: 64, failed: 2
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : hainzel (amd64) - tests ran: 1, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : ms10-35-mcdivittB0-kernel (arm64) - tests ran: 64, failed: 2
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : archytas (amd64) - tests ran: 1, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : secchi (amd64) - tests ran: 10, failed: 2
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : hainzel (amd64) - tests ran: 19, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : secchi (amd64) - tests ran: 5, failed: 1
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : archytas (amd64) - tests ran: 19, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : gonzo (amd64) - tests ran: 1, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : secchi (amd64) - tests ran: 16, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : gonzo (i386) - tests ran: 1, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : hainzel (amd64) - tests ran: 10, failed: 2
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : archytas (amd64) - tests ran: 10, failed: 2
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : secchi (amd64) - tests ran: 19, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : gonzo (amd64) - tests ran: 19, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : hainzel (amd64) - tests ran: 5, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : archytas (amd64) - tests ran: 5, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : hainzel (amd64) - tests ran: 16, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : secchi (amd64) - tests ran: 141, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : archytas (amd64) - tests ran: 16, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : secchi (amd64) - tests ran: 2, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : gonzo (i386) - tests ran: 6, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : secchi (amd64) - tests ran: 64, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : hainzel (amd64) - tests ran: 19, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : archytas (amd64) - tests ran: 19, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : gonzo (amd64) - tests ran: 141, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : hainzel (amd64) - tests ran: 141, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : archytas (amd64) - tests ran: 141, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : hainzel (amd64) - tests ran: 2, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : archytas (amd64) - tests ran: 2, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : gonzo (i386) - tests ran: 141, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : hainzel (amd64) - tests ran: 64, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : gonzo (amd64) - tests ran: 2, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : archytas (amd64) - tests ran: 64, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : rumford (amd64) - tests ran: 1, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : gonzo (amd64) - tests ran: 64, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : rumford (amd64) - tests ran: 19, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : rumford (amd64) - tests ran: 10, failed: 2
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : rumford (amd64) - tests ran: 37, failed: 4
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : rumford (amd64) - tests ran: 19, failed: 1
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : rumford (amd64) - tests ran: 141, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : rumford (amd64) - tests ran: 2, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Brad Figg (brad-figg) wrote : rumford (amd64) - tests ran: 64, failed: 0
Revision history for this message
Taihsiang Ho (tai271828) wrote :

Hardware Certification have completed testing this -proposed kernel. No regressions were observed, results are available here: http://people.canonical.com/~hwcert/sru-testing/yakkety/4.8.0-47.50/yakkety-proposed-published.html

tags: added: certification-testing-passed
Revision history for this message
Launchpad Janitor (janitor) wrote :
Download full text (14.5 KiB)

This bug was fixed in the package linux - 4.8.0-49.52

---------------
linux (4.8.0-49.52) yakkety; urgency=low

  * linux: 4.8.0-49.52 -proposed tracker (LP: #1684427)

  * [Hyper-V] hv: util: move waiting for release to hv_utils_transport itself
    (LP: #1682561)
    - Drivers: hv: util: move waiting for release to hv_utils_transport itself

linux (4.8.0-48.51) yakkety; urgency=low

  * linux: 4.8.0-48.51 -proposed tracker (LP: #1682034)

  * [Hyper-V] hv: vmbus: Raise retry/wait limits in vmbus_post_msg()
    (LP: #1681893)
    - Drivers: hv: vmbus: Raise retry/wait limits in vmbus_post_msg()

linux (4.8.0-47.50) yakkety; urgency=low

  * linux: 4.8.0-47.50 -proposed tracker (LP: #1679678)

  * CVE-2017-6353
    - sctp: deny peeloff operation on asocs with threads sleeping on it

  * CVE-2017-5986
    - sctp: avoid BUG_ON on sctp_wait_for_sndbuf

  * vfat: missing iso8859-1 charset (LP: #1677230)
    - [Config] NLS_ISO8859_1=y

  * [Hyper-V] pci-hyperv: Use device serial number as PCI domain (LP: #1667527)
    - net/mlx4_core: Use cq quota in SRIOV when creating completion EQs

  * Regression: KVM modules should be on main kernel package (LP: #1678099)
    - [Config] powerpc: Add kvm-hv and kvm-pr to the generic inclusion list

  * linux-lts-xenial 4.4.0-63.84~14.04.2 ADT test failure with linux-lts-xenial
    4.4.0-63.84~14.04.2 (LP: #1664912)
    - SAUCE: apparmor: fix link auditing failure due to, uninitialized var

  * regession tests failing after stackprofile test is run (LP: #1661030)
    - SAUCE: fix regression with domain change in complain mode

  * Permission denied and inconsistent behavior in complain mode with 'ip netns
    list' command (LP: #1648903)
    - SAUCE: fix regression with domain change in complain mode

  * unexpected errno=13 and disconnected path when trying to open /proc/1/ns/mnt
    from a unshared mount namespace (LP: #1656121)
    - SAUCE: apparmor: null profiles should inherit parent control flags

  * apparmor refcount leak of profile namespace when removing profiles
    (LP: #1660849)
    - SAUCE: apparmor: fix ns ref count link when removing profiles from policy

  * tor in lxd: apparmor="DENIED" operation="change_onexec"
    namespace="root//CONTAINERNAME_<var-lib-lxd>" profile="unconfined"
    name="system_tor" (LP: #1648143)
    - SAUCE: apparmor: Fix no_new_privs blocking change_onexec when using stacked
      namespaces

  * apparmor oops in bind_mnt when dev_path lookup fails (LP: #1660840)
    - SAUCE: apparmor: fix oops in bind_mnt when dev_path lookup fails

  * apparmor auditing denied access of special apparmor .null fi\ le
    (LP: #1660836)
    - SAUCE: apparmor: Don't audit denied access of special apparmor .null file

  * apparmor label leak when new label is unused (LP: #1660834)
    - SAUCE: apparmor: fix label leak when new label is unused

  * apparmor reference count bug in label_merge_insert() (LP: #1660833)
    - SAUCE: apparmor: fix reference count bug in label_merge_insert()

  * apparmor's raw_data file in securityfs is sometimes truncated (LP: #1638996)
    - SAUCE: apparmor: fix replacement race in reading rawdata

  * unix domain socket cross permission check failing with n...

Changed in linux (Ubuntu Yakkety):
status: New → Fix Released
To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.